Chargers On Wall or On Board?
Grab our Forum Feed

View Poll Results: How do you think chargers should be implemented?

Voters
28. You may not vote on this poll
  • Built into the cars

    23 82.14%
  • Separate from the cars

    5 17.86%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 3
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Chargers On Wall or On Board?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    North OC, CA
    Posts
    521

    Default

    The best thing that Tesla has done is to allow the Model S to be charged with a $5 to $8 NEMA 14-50 receptacle. Only a 50 amp breaker is needed for the NEMA 14-50. As you can see in MTN Ranger's post on the previous page, there is a NEMA 14-50 receptacle on the wall under the charge station. I plan to install both so two Telsas can charge at the same time. For the fastest charge at 62 mph, you must have a 100 amp circuit breaker for the High Power Wall Connector and the twin charger option built into the Model S. A smaller breaker can be used for a slower charge with the Wall Connector. (A 200 amp second meter panel was installed after purchasing the Volt with the knowledge that the Tesla would need the extra power.)

    Tesla includes with each Model S, the 240 volt adapter, 120 volt adapter and a J1772 adapter for charging almost anywhere.

    http://www.teslamotors.com/models/charging

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,983

    Default

    That 240 volt adapter and 120 volt adapter are a nice feature. But the Tesla EVSE is almost EXACTLY the same thing as your Voltec 120 volt unit that came with your car. The model S still requires an EVSE with a J1772 system... Just like your Volt. Only difference is the standard Tesla EVSE is dual voltage. (And that IS a nice feature.)

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Troy
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Why doesn't Chevy incorporate a twin turbine charging system into the Volt? The turbine housing can be cylindrical in design and be made to spin in between heavy magnets which will in-turn create electricity to charge the batteries. As long as the vehicle is in motion, the batteries are constantly being charged. The charging system can make electricity like a lawn mower does, only this is being generated by wind. I don't see why the Volt wouldn't go from New York to California as long as the car is in motion. The car would need to be charged from an external power source when sitting idle. I'm sure this charging idea was thought of by the engineers at Chevrolet, but I'm also sure the Oil companies quickly frowned upon this idea as well. I'm not a Chevy Volt owner, yet, but I am thinking about purchasing a Volt and making these changes on my own. I'm not worried about voiding the warranty.
    Last edited by Richrd44; 07-06-2012 at 12:38 PM.

  4.  

    Advertisement

  5. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Lakeland Florida
    Posts
    1,279

    Default

    Richrd44, welcome to the forum

    Your idea is better known as perpetual motion

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
    2012 Crystal Red Volt #10921 - Plug Powered #76

  6. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    313

    Default

    Just for fun, I looked up 10kW wind turbines. 10kW is about 13hp, which might sustain 45ish mph after conversion losses if you pretend that it also has zero drag (see Henry's link about perpetual motion).

    The blade diameter is 26.2 feet, it sits on a 60ft mast (minimum) and it costs $58,950!

    Mike
    Volt #777

  7. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Mass
    Posts
    118

    Default

    [QUOTE=Mark Z;161282]The best thing that Tesla has done is to allow the Model S to be charged with a $5 to $8 NEMA 14-50 receptacle. Only a 50 amp breaker is needed for the NEMA 14-50. As you can see in MTN Ranger's post on the previous page, there is a NEMA 14-50 receptacle on the wall under the charge station. I plan to install both so two Telsas can charge at the same time. >>>SNIP
    Sounds real dangerous to me unless the outlet is in a dry garage and the cord is permanently attached to the Model S.

  8. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    208

    Default

    I believe the Tesla can be ordered with three different battery sizes. And with the larger (largest?) you can also get two onboard chargers instead of one. So if the car has two chargers (3.3kWh or 7.7kWh??), at 7.7kWh you would need 240v at 32A EVSE circuit.

  9. #28
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC VIN:#C-8909
    Posts
    2,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timlange3 View Post
    I believe the Tesla can be ordered with three different battery sizes. And with the larger (largest?) you can also get two onboard chargers instead of one. So if the car has two chargers (3.3kWh or 7.7kWh??), at 7.7kWh you would need 240v at 32A EVSE circuit.
    The standard Model S onboard charger is 10kW (50A), the upgrade option is 20kW (100A).
    2012 Blue Topaz Volt - VIN:#C-8909 - Leather Seats Black with Dark Trim, Rear Camera
    9/15/11 Ordered, 11/18/11 Arrived (highly efficient signature zone) Volt Stats


Similar Threads

  1. kwh @ wall, vs reported
    By Kacey Green in forum Newcomers
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-24-2012, 01:02 PM
  2. Arcadia (FL) Chevrolet Makes it to Wall of Shame
    By flmark in forum Buying/Leasing
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 10-14-2011, 10:47 PM
  3. 3.3 kW on board charger
    By rphooper in forum Engineering and Design
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-14-2010, 07:00 AM
  4. Wall Street Journal ECOnomics Conference
    By misslexi in forum Politics, Finance, and Environment
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-07-2009, 02:13 PM
  5. CA Air Resources Board Needs Input
    By KariK in forum General Motors and General Automotive Topics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-23-2008, 06:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts