In order to give proportional coverage to the issue of man-made climate change relative to the level of scientific consensus on the issue, I propose (only somewhat sarcastically) that the GM-Volt moderators post front-page articles explaining why the vast majority of scientist DO believe in anthropogenic global warming (i.e., man-made climate change) for the next 34 days straight.
After all, 97.1% of peer-reviewed scientific studies that took a position on AGW from 1991-2011 support AGW, versus only 2.9% that reject AGW. So that's a ratio of 34 peer-reviewed papers in support of AGW for every 1 that rejects it. It only seems fair that such an overwhelming scientific consensus would get proportionally overwhelming coverage, right?
Seriously, moderators, WTF were you thinking? This is an f'ing disgrace. It's one thing if Mr. Cobb wants to post this nonsense in a regular post, but to endorse his views by putting this as a featured daily article on the front page makes the whole site look like it's run by a bunch of loons.