<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volt Doesn&#8217;t Meet CARB Designation, Californians Lose $5,000 Tax Incentive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2010/07/17/volt-doesnt-meet-carb-designation-californians-lose-5000-tax-incentive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/07/17/volt-doesnt-meet-carb-designation-californians-lose-5000-tax-incentive/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 10:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pest Control Seattle</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/07/17/volt-doesnt-meet-carb-designation-californians-lose-5000-tax-incentive/#comment-212736</link>
		<dc:creator>Pest Control Seattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=4426#comment-212736</guid>
		<description>Fantastic stuff as always. Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic stuff as always. Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICUR12</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/07/17/volt-doesnt-meet-carb-designation-californians-lose-5000-tax-incentive/#comment-210679</link>
		<dc:creator>ICUR12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=4426#comment-210679</guid>
		<description>My post is so far down on the list I wonder if it will be seen.

No one has pointed out that there was only $4.1 million dollars appropriated for the California CARB and it is first come first serve for those who are eligible. So at $5000 for each vehicle you arrive at 820 people who will actually get the incentive.

Odds aren&#039;t too good for getting it as the funds will be expended in about one month. Leaf buyers have no better chance than a PHEV buyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My post is so far down on the list I wonder if it will be seen.</p>
<p>No one has pointed out that there was only $4.1 million dollars appropriated for the California CARB and it is first come first serve for those who are eligible. So at $5000 for each vehicle you arrive at 820 people who will actually get the incentive.</p>
<p>Odds aren&#8217;t too good for getting it as the funds will be expended in about one month. Leaf buyers have no better chance than a PHEV buyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent beuchert</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/07/17/volt-doesnt-meet-carb-designation-californians-lose-5000-tax-incentive/#comment-210422</link>
		<dc:creator>kent beuchert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=4426#comment-210422</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you just love the way politicians act as though a tax incentive doesn&#039;t cost anybody anything.  I would sooner see tax breaks given to those with real financial problems than some well-heeled drivers given subsidies with my tax dollars to buy a car that they (probably) don&#039;t even need. Nor does the reduced emissions rationale hold any water these days. Only True Believers and the extremely anal still think they are going to save our planet&#039;s future by avoiding carbon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you just love the way politicians act as though a tax incentive doesn&#8217;t cost anybody anything.  I would sooner see tax breaks given to those with real financial problems than some well-heeled drivers given subsidies with my tax dollars to buy a car that they (probably) don&#8217;t even need. Nor does the reduced emissions rationale hold any water these days. Only True Believers and the extremely anal still think they are going to save our planet&#8217;s future by avoiding carbon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason the Saj</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/07/17/volt-doesnt-meet-carb-designation-californians-lose-5000-tax-incentive/#comment-210337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason the Saj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=4426#comment-210337</guid>
		<description>This is politics... and politicians are by definition stupid narrow sighted idiots.


Essentially, they created a law based on one aspect of present technology. The result, the law doesn&#039;t take into account the advancements and is inflexible.

The same thing happened to the Prius. People couldn&#039;t get registered because the vehicle couldn&#039;t be tested for emissions in some states. Okay, so we have an environmentally healthier vehicle but it fails the environmental test.

Likewise, the Prius needs to waste gas warming up the catalytic converter so it can meet dinosaur laws.  Our legislators need to pass good laws, update the old laws, or get out of their seats.

California legislators should revise the law to account for vehicles like the Volt. Yes, the engine may not be super-low emissions. But the engine is a partial use drive system.  Therefore, what should be considered is whether the vehicle is a lower emission based on expected use.

For example, what is the emission level per year?  This would dramatically affect the eligibility of the Volt. But hey, California has been full of some of the dumbest politicians for a couple decades now. Don&#039;t expect them to do anything intelligent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is politics&#8230; and politicians are by definition stupid narrow sighted idiots.</p>
<p>Essentially, they created a law based on one aspect of present technology. The result, the law doesn&#8217;t take into account the advancements and is inflexible.</p>
<p>The same thing happened to the Prius. People couldn&#8217;t get registered because the vehicle couldn&#8217;t be tested for emissions in some states. Okay, so we have an environmentally healthier vehicle but it fails the environmental test.</p>
<p>Likewise, the Prius needs to waste gas warming up the catalytic converter so it can meet dinosaur laws.  Our legislators need to pass good laws, update the old laws, or get out of their seats.</p>
<p>California legislators should revise the law to account for vehicles like the Volt. Yes, the engine may not be super-low emissions. But the engine is a partial use drive system.  Therefore, what should be considered is whether the vehicle is a lower emission based on expected use.</p>
<p>For example, what is the emission level per year?  This would dramatically affect the eligibility of the Volt. But hey, California has been full of some of the dumbest politicians for a couple decades now. Don&#8217;t expect them to do anything intelligent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarZin</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/07/17/volt-doesnt-meet-carb-designation-californians-lose-5000-tax-incentive/#comment-210030</link>
		<dc:creator>CarZin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=4426#comment-210030</guid>
		<description>Spectacular.  Personally, I&#039;d like all the manufacturer&#039;s to thumb their noses at California regulations.  These regulations cost everyone in the entire U.S., not just people in California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spectacular.  Personally, I&#8217;d like all the manufacturer&#8217;s to thumb their noses at California regulations.  These regulations cost everyone in the entire U.S., not just people in California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 405/405 objects using apc

Served from: gm-volt.com @ 2012-05-26 07:37:46 -->
