Comments on: GM Not Pulling Back on Voltec http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/08/gm-not-pulling-back-on-voltec/ Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt. Sat, 26 May 2012 08:46:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Noel Park http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/08/gm-not-pulling-back-on-voltec/#comment-181690 Noel Park Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:19:06 +0000 http://gm-volt.com/?p=3188#comment-181690 <blockquote cite="comment-181526"> <strong><a href="#comment-181526" rel="nofollow">nuclearboy</a></strong>: On topic, Glad to hear GM is still fully committed to Voltec. This may be a transitional technology as some have stated but I think it will last for 10-20 years. In the future, maybe the batteries will be bigger and maybe the generator and ICE can be much smaller but it will be a good ideal to have a generator on board for many years to come. </blockquote> #189 Dead right IMHO. +1

nuclearboy: On topic,
Glad to hear GM is still fully committed to Voltec. This may be a transitional technology as some have stated but I think it will last for 10-20 years. In the future, maybe the batteries will be bigger and maybe the generator and ICE can be much smaller but it will be a good ideal to have a generator on board for many years to come.

#189

Dead right IMHO. +1

]]> By: Noel Park http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/08/gm-not-pulling-back-on-voltec/#comment-181689 Noel Park Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:15:01 +0000 http://gm-volt.com/?p=3188#comment-181689 <blockquote cite="comment-181515"> <strong><a href="#comment-181515" rel="nofollow">DonC</a></strong>: Yeah, you have that right. Who would want to replace the inefficient economy-wrecking job-killing machine which is our current health care system with something more rational and sustainable? Now that would be absolutely crazy!!! LOL </blockquote> #178 Thanks. +1

DonC: Yeah, you have that right. Who would want to replace the inefficient economy-wrecking job-killing machine which is our current health care system with something more rational and sustainable? Now that would be absolutely crazy!!! LOL

#178

Thanks. +1

]]> By: Noel Park http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/08/gm-not-pulling-back-on-voltec/#comment-181688 Noel Park Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:13:38 +0000 http://gm-volt.com/?p=3188#comment-181688 <blockquote cite="comment-181510"> <strong><a href="#comment-181510" rel="nofollow">Michael</a></strong>: Aren’t British sports cars supposed to be painted British Racing Green? </blockquote> #173 Damn right! +1

Michael: Aren’t British sports cars supposed to be painted British Racing Green?

#173

Damn right! +1

]]> By: teds http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/08/gm-not-pulling-back-on-voltec/#comment-181661 teds Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:51:52 +0000 http://gm-volt.com/?p=3188#comment-181661 1) I don't see why it has to be heavier or more expensive to make. 2) I think it looks WAY better then the Volt. 1) I don’t see why it has to be heavier or more expensive to make.
2) I think it looks WAY better then the Volt.

]]> By: Tagamet http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/08/gm-not-pulling-back-on-voltec/#comment-181595 Tagamet Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:41:02 +0000 http://gm-volt.com/?p=3188#comment-181595 <blockquote cite="comment-181574"> <strong><a href="#comment-181574" rel="nofollow">Dave K.</a></strong>: I thought the topic was GM not pulling back Voltec. Good to see it’s still okay to go off topic.=D-Volt   </blockquote> I asked the same question way back at #166. This thread sure wandered, but without *much* acrimony. Be well and believe, Tagamet <b>L</b>et's <b>J</b>ust <b>G</b>et <b>T</b>he <b>VOLTS '</b> <b>W</b>heels <b>O</b>n <b>T</b>he <b>R</b>oad!!****<b>NPNS</b>

Dave K.:
I thought the topic was GM not pulling back Voltec. Good to see it’s still okay to go off topic.=D-Volt  

I asked the same question way back at #166. This thread sure wandered, but without *much* acrimony.
Be well and believe,
Tagamet

Let’s Just Get The VOLTS ‘ Wheels On The Road!!****NPNS

]]>