<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report:  GM Drops Voltec for Cadillac, Kills Converj Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/02/report-gm-drops-voltec-for-cadillac-kills-converj-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/02/report-gm-drops-voltec-for-cadillac-kills-converj-program/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:46:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Engineer</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/02/report-gm-drops-voltec-for-cadillac-kills-converj-program/#comment-180771</link>
		<dc:creator>Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=3177#comment-180771</guid>
		<description>BOOO I say, but I can also say way to go just because in the face of a tight fiscal budget it was probably the right move.  

Not to mention that with the Converj&#039;s lower electric range it could be detrimental to the EREV concept.

But anywho just means that I will have to buy two volts and convert one to a project car!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOOO I say, but I can also say way to go just because in the face of a tight fiscal budget it was probably the right move.  </p>
<p>Not to mention that with the Converj&#8217;s lower electric range it could be detrimental to the EREV concept.</p>
<p>But anywho just means that I will have to buy two volts and convert one to a project car!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TVAF</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/02/report-gm-drops-voltec-for-cadillac-kills-converj-program/#comment-180448</link>
		<dc:creator>TVAF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=3177#comment-180448</guid>
		<description>Gran error. 

Es una verdadera pena y ha sido una gran decepción. Si GM no estaba segura, no debería haber presentado ese coche con el sistema Voltec.

Esto solo crea desconfianza en GM, en Voltec y en el futuro del Volt. 

Con esta noticia creo que a estas alturas, ya nadie cree que el Volt sea algo consistente y serio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gran error. </p>
<p>Es una verdadera pena y ha sido una gran decepción. Si GM no estaba segura, no debería haber presentado ese coche con el sistema Voltec.</p>
<p>Esto solo crea desconfianza en GM, en Voltec y en el futuro del Volt. </p>
<p>Con esta noticia creo que a estas alturas, ya nadie cree que el Volt sea algo consistente y serio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RogerE333</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/02/report-gm-drops-voltec-for-cadillac-kills-converj-program/#comment-180395</link>
		<dc:creator>RogerE333</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=3177#comment-180395</guid>
		<description>Hohum, I find myself not really caring, as a Cadillac non-fan.  Look on the bright side, this will free up more batteries for Volt production.

IMO the main issue is probably that Cadillac owners expect ridiculous horsepower levels like 250+ for a smallish car like this.  So some kind of parallel hybrid would probably make more sense here.

Car companies do it all the time -- &quot;run it up the flagpole and see who salutes&quot;.  In this case apparently nobody saluted, or at least not the faithful Cadillac crowd (sorry, my aunt passed on in 1996 at 85).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hohum, I find myself not really caring, as a Cadillac non-fan.  Look on the bright side, this will free up more batteries for Volt production.</p>
<p>IMO the main issue is probably that Cadillac owners expect ridiculous horsepower levels like 250+ for a smallish car like this.  So some kind of parallel hybrid would probably make more sense here.</p>
<p>Car companies do it all the time &#8212; &#8220;run it up the flagpole and see who salutes&#8221;.  In this case apparently nobody saluted, or at least not the faithful Cadillac crowd (sorry, my aunt passed on in 1996 at 85).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Park</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/02/report-gm-drops-voltec-for-cadillac-kills-converj-program/#comment-180385</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=3177#comment-180385</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-180265&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-180265&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Volt45&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Plus, remember a lot of Prius buyers “moved down” from luxury brands like BMW and Lexus. So, it’s possible Volt sales would hurt Converj sales. The normal lines and boundaries don’t apply here.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

#183

True that.  +1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-180265">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-180265" rel="nofollow">Volt45</a></strong>: Plus, remember a lot of Prius buyers “moved down” from luxury brands like BMW and Lexus. So, it’s possible Volt sales would hurt Converj sales. The normal lines and boundaries don’t apply here.
</p></blockquote>
<p>#183</p>
<p>True that.  +1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Park</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2010/03/02/report-gm-drops-voltec-for-cadillac-kills-converj-program/#comment-180384</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=3177#comment-180384</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-180264&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-180264&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;old man&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: #180, GM =WASTE

We would have plenty of time to look for that nonexisting tail pipe while waiting for a tow truck and wishing we had a Volt.  
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

#182

LOL.  +1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-180264">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-180264" rel="nofollow">old man</a></strong>: #180, GM =WASTE</p>
<p>We would have plenty of time to look for that nonexisting tail pipe while waiting for a tow truck and wishing we had a Volt.
</p></blockquote>
<p>#182</p>
<p>LOL.  +1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 402/405 objects using apc

Served from: gm-volt.com @ 2012-05-26 05:08:16 -->
