<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report:  GM Cancels Plan For 53 MPG Dedicated Chevy Hybrid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/12/18/report-gm-cancels-plan-for-53-mpg-dedicated-chevy-hybrid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/12/18/report-gm-cancels-plan-for-53-mpg-dedicated-chevy-hybrid/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/12/18/report-gm-cancels-plan-for-53-mpg-dedicated-chevy-hybrid/#comment-169835</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 06:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=2414#comment-169835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-164271&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-164271&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dave G&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: But there is no battery technology on the horizon that would work for this 17%. Long distance, heavy duty transportation will continue to require liquid fuel.;&lt;a title=&quot;Click here or select text to quote comment&quot; href=&quot;void(null)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(Quote)&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If battery chemistry such as Lithium-Air (or other) becomes economical and feasabile I think that large transport trucks could be a possibility to go electric.  Of course this would problably require a 1,000 KW/h (usable) battery pack but that can easily be recharged within the 10 hour mandatory rest period at truck stops.

Of course like everything it all comes down to ROI which means gas prices need to increase.  The frieght industry wont try to pursue the possibility of alternative fuels until gasonline becomes a crutch.  I am not for raising taxes, but dammit increase the gasoline tax.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-164271">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-164271" rel="nofollow">Dave G</a></strong>: But there is no battery technology on the horizon that would work for this 17%. Long distance, heavy duty transportation will continue to require liquid fuel.;<a title="Click here or select text to quote comment" href="void(null)" rel="nofollow">(Quote)</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p>If battery chemistry such as Lithium-Air (or other) becomes economical and feasabile I think that large transport trucks could be a possibility to go electric.  Of course this would problably require a 1,000 KW/h (usable) battery pack but that can easily be recharged within the 10 hour mandatory rest period at truck stops.</p>
<p>Of course like everything it all comes down to ROI which means gas prices need to increase.  The frieght industry wont try to pursue the possibility of alternative fuels until gasonline becomes a crutch.  I am not for raising taxes, but dammit increase the gasoline tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjand</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/12/18/report-gm-cancels-plan-for-53-mpg-dedicated-chevy-hybrid/#comment-165698</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=2414#comment-165698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-164004&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-164004&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gsned57&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: 
It’s even got a toyota badge!talk about stealing the design  &#160;&#160;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

it is not the actual design They dropped the hole program so writer of the article used a prius for the pic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-164004">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-164004" rel="nofollow">Gsned57</a></strong>:<br />
It’s even got a toyota badge!talk about stealing the design  &nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>it is not the actual design They dropped the hole program so writer of the article used a prius for the pic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Cancels the 53mpg Hybrid Chevrolet and Proceeds to PHEVs &#124; Car industry</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/12/18/report-gm-cancels-plan-for-53-mpg-dedicated-chevy-hybrid/#comment-164943</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Cancels the 53mpg Hybrid Chevrolet and Proceeds to PHEVs &#124; Car industry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=2414#comment-164943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] report on GM-Volt.com says that the automaker is now focusing on plug-in hybrids as well as on electric cars like the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] report on GM-Volt.com says that the automaker is now focusing on plug-in hybrids as well as on electric cars like the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Park</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/12/18/report-gm-cancels-plan-for-53-mpg-dedicated-chevy-hybrid/#comment-164685</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=2414#comment-164685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A big mistake, IMHO.  How sad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big mistake, IMHO.  How sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john1701a</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/12/18/report-gm-cancels-plan-for-53-mpg-dedicated-chevy-hybrid/#comment-164475</link>
		<dc:creator>john1701a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=2414#comment-164475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-164458&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-164458&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Johnny P&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: A Malibu is a massive family sized 5 passenger sedan as compared to a Prius, &amp; if you can get 40Mpg in that type car it will be a killer pproduct!
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How would an &lt;b&gt;ASSIST&lt;/b&gt; hybrid with only a single small motor compete with a &lt;b&gt;FULL&lt;/b&gt; hybrid using two motors, with the traction one significantly larger?  

Knowing where both the input &amp; output electricity come and quantity available for the different types of non-plug hybrids is yet another example of support shortcomings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-164458">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-164458" rel="nofollow">Johnny P</a></strong>: A Malibu is a massive family sized 5 passenger sedan as compared to a Prius, &amp; if you can get 40Mpg in that type car it will be a killer pproduct!
</p></blockquote>
<p>How would an <b>ASSIST</b> hybrid with only a single small motor compete with a <b>FULL</b> hybrid using two motors, with the traction one significantly larger?  </p>
<p>Knowing where both the input &amp; output electricity come and quantity available for the different types of non-plug hybrids is yet another example of support shortcomings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
