<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What BMW Has Learned from the MINI E Program So Far:  That They May Need to Build EREVs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/15/what-bmw-has-learned-from-the-mini-e-program-so-far-that-they-may-need-to-build-erevs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/15/what-bmw-has-learned-from-the-mini-e-program-so-far-that-they-may-need-to-build-erevs/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob G</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/15/what-bmw-has-learned-from-the-mini-e-program-so-far-that-they-may-need-to-build-erevs/#comment-158281</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=2051#comment-158281</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-157917&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-157917&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JohnK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Bob G
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I like the idea from a technical perspective - always having a spare battery at home charged up and ready to go -  but I&#039;d be concerned with the cost of the extra battery and the packaging hardware to make it easily swappable.  With today&#039;s technology, I still think the ICE / Generator and supporting hardware is cheaper and more convenient (i.e., gas stations everywhere).

However, as battery costs come down and charging stations spring up, EREV will have served its purpose as a bridge technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-157917">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-157917" rel="nofollow">JohnK</a></strong>: Bob G
</p></blockquote>
<p>I like the idea from a technical perspective &#8211; always having a spare battery at home charged up and ready to go &#8211;  but I&#8217;d be concerned with the cost of the extra battery and the packaging hardware to make it easily swappable.  With today&#8217;s technology, I still think the ICE / Generator and supporting hardware is cheaper and more convenient (i.e., gas stations everywhere).</p>
<p>However, as battery costs come down and charging stations spring up, EREV will have served its purpose as a bridge technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barney-not-blue-dino</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/15/what-bmw-has-learned-from-the-mini-e-program-so-far-that-they-may-need-to-build-erevs/#comment-158201</link>
		<dc:creator>barney-not-blue-dino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=2051#comment-158201</guid>
		<description>The industry is still working on a &quot;automotive&quot; battery.  Any statements against the feasability of swappable vs fast charging vs (yours) should be
delayed.  Unless you like being proven wrong.

I do not think anyone knows at this point.   Lets try everything, Winner Take All.  I do not want to run into incompatibly issues like with my inkjet.

As long as there is 1 WINNER  like gasoline!  (oh, does diesel count as gas?)  ok, 2 closely related winners for simplicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The industry is still working on a &#8220;automotive&#8221; battery.  Any statements against the feasability of swappable vs fast charging vs (yours) should be<br />
delayed.  Unless you like being proven wrong.</p>
<p>I do not think anyone knows at this point.   Lets try everything, Winner Take All.  I do not want to run into incompatibly issues like with my inkjet.</p>
<p>As long as there is 1 WINNER  like gasoline!  (oh, does diesel count as gas?)  ok, 2 closely related winners for simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barney-not-blue-dino</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/15/what-bmw-has-learned-from-the-mini-e-program-so-far-that-they-may-need-to-build-erevs/#comment-158198</link>
		<dc:creator>barney-not-blue-dino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=2051#comment-158198</guid>
		<description>Solution to 10 min charging, Charge them in parallel -- multiple plugs.  
You want to charge sub-packs anyways.  10 plugs should do nicely.

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-157885&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-157885&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dave G&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: For example, to charge a 250 AER SUV in 10 minutes, that would require around 500,000 watts. The connectors that power companies use for this are 12 inches in diameter. The cables are huge. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solution to 10 min charging, Charge them in parallel &#8212; multiple plugs.<br />
You want to charge sub-packs anyways.  10 plugs should do nicely.</p>
<blockquote cite="comment-157885">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-157885" rel="nofollow">Dave G</a></strong>: For example, to charge a 250 AER SUV in 10 minutes, that would require around 500,000 watts. The connectors that power companies use for this are 12 inches in diameter. The cables are huge.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darius</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/15/what-bmw-has-learned-from-the-mini-e-program-so-far-that-they-may-need-to-build-erevs/#comment-158127</link>
		<dc:creator>Darius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=2051#comment-158127</guid>
		<description>Number of battery cycles may be is more important than electric range. 40 miles AER would be enaugh with unlimites number of cycles and $4000 battery pack price with capacitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number of battery cycles may be is more important than electric range. 40 miles AER would be enaugh with unlimites number of cycles and $4000 battery pack price with capacitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent beuchert</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/15/what-bmw-has-learned-from-the-mini-e-program-so-far-that-they-may-need-to-build-erevs/#comment-158095</link>
		<dc:creator>kent beuchert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=2051#comment-158095</guid>
		<description>Why on earth this guy thinks that range problems will be solved by public recharge facilities remains a mystery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on earth this guy thinks that range problems will be solved by public recharge facilities remains a mystery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 401/405 objects using apc

Served from: gm-volt.com @ 2012-02-13 13:47:16 -->
