<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lutz Says Volt SS a Possibility, Cadillac Converj Reportedly Greenlighted for Production</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/09/lutz-says-volt-ss-a-possibility-cadillac-converj-greenlighted-for-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/09/lutz-says-volt-ss-a-possibility-cadillac-converj-greenlighted-for-production/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:42:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/09/lutz-says-volt-ss-a-possibility-cadillac-converj-greenlighted-for-production/#comment-158485</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1999#comment-158485</guid>
		<description>I actually think the SS name has a lot of positive street-cred with enthusiasts, and see no reason it couldn&#039;t be applied to an electric car as well. Let&#039;s face it, most car buyers are largely ignorant about automotive history, so I doubt many of them would have a negative view of it from the 60s and 70s musclecars. 

Ironically, I think a lot of the same people that owned SS musclecars back in the day would also be interested in a Volt SS. There is a breed of enthusiasts (myself included) that don&#039;t really care where the propulsion comes from, as long as it pushes us back in the seat! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think the SS name has a lot of positive street-cred with enthusiasts, and see no reason it couldn&#8217;t be applied to an electric car as well. Let&#8217;s face it, most car buyers are largely ignorant about automotive history, so I doubt many of them would have a negative view of it from the 60s and 70s musclecars. </p>
<p>Ironically, I think a lot of the same people that owned SS musclecars back in the day would also be interested in a Volt SS. There is a breed of enthusiasts (myself included) that don&#8217;t really care where the propulsion comes from, as long as it pushes us back in the seat! <img src='http://gm-volt.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coffeetime</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/09/lutz-says-volt-ss-a-possibility-cadillac-converj-greenlighted-for-production/#comment-157243</link>
		<dc:creator>coffeetime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1999#comment-157243</guid>
		<description>The Converj is at the Seattle Auto Show, which opens today (11/11).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Converj is at the Seattle Auto Show, which opens today (11/11).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sporty Volt SS Possible, Cadillac Converj Gets Green Light : Gas 2.0</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/09/lutz-says-volt-ss-a-possibility-cadillac-converj-greenlighted-for-production/#comment-157191</link>
		<dc:creator>Sporty Volt SS Possible, Cadillac Converj Gets Green Light : Gas 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1999#comment-157191</guid>
		<description>[...] GM-Volt &#124; Images: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GM-Volt | Images: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kdawg</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/09/lutz-says-volt-ss-a-possibility-cadillac-converj-greenlighted-for-production/#comment-157105</link>
		<dc:creator>kdawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1999#comment-157105</guid>
		<description>Technical problems it appears. My post above was in response to Loboc #87.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technical problems it appears. My post above was in response to Loboc #87.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kdawg</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/11/09/lutz-says-volt-ss-a-possibility-cadillac-converj-greenlighted-for-production/#comment-157103</link>
		<dc:creator>kdawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1999#comment-157103</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-156875&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-156875&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Loboc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: dawg
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or just put the ICE &amp; traction motor in the rear.. trunk up front.  Lots of possibilities.  I prefer FWD due to Michigan winters, but wouldnt be opposed to someone besides Tesla making a sporty RWD electrically driven car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-156875">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-156875" rel="nofollow">Loboc</a></strong>: dawg
</p></blockquote>
<p>Or just put the ICE &amp; traction motor in the rear.. trunk up front.  Lots of possibilities.  I prefer FWD due to Michigan winters, but wouldnt be opposed to someone besides Tesla making a sporty RWD electrically driven car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 409/409 objects using apc

Served from: gm-volt.com @ 2012-05-26 03:28:29 -->
