<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM Reveals OnStar EV Lab Which Connects to Chevy Volt Prototypes, OnStar Will be Standard in Production</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/10/21/gm-reveals-onstar-ev-lab-which-connects-to-chevy-volt-prototypes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/10/21/gm-reveals-onstar-ev-lab-which-connects-to-chevy-volt-prototypes/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:42:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsme</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/10/21/gm-reveals-onstar-ev-lab-which-connects-to-chevy-volt-prototypes/#comment-155239</link>
		<dc:creator>itsme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1885#comment-155239</guid>
		<description>,           ,     
            /(               )
            \ \___ .     / &#124;
            /- _  `     -/  &#124;
           (/\   /  \  \     /\
           /    /    &#124;   `      \
          (O) (O )  /        &#124;
           `-^--&#039;`&lt;           )
          (_.)   _   )       /
           `.___/`       /
             `-----&#039;     /
&lt;----.     __ / __   \
&lt;----&#124;====O)))==) \) /====
&lt;----&#039;    `--&#039; `.__,&#039;     \
             &#124;                 &#124;
              \               /
         ______( (_  / \______
       ,&#039;  ,-----&#039;              &#124;          \
       `--{__________)           \/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>,           ,<br />
            /(               )<br />
            \ \___ .     / |<br />
            /- _  `     -/  |<br />
           (/\   /  \  \     /\<br />
           /    /    |   `      \<br />
          (O) (O )  /        |<br />
           `-^&#8211;&#8217;`&lt;           )<br />
          (_.)   _   )       /<br />
           `.___/`       /<br />
             `&#8212;&#8211;&#039;     /<br />
&lt;&#8212;-.     __ / __   \<br />
&lt;&#8212;-|====O)))==) \) /====<br />
&lt;&#8212;-&#039;    `&#8211;&#039; `.__,&#039;     \<br />
             |                 |<br />
              \               /<br />
         ______( (_  / \______<br />
       ,&#039;  ,&#8212;&#8211;&#039;              |          \<br />
       `&#8211;{__________)           \/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/10/21/gm-reveals-onstar-ev-lab-which-connects-to-chevy-volt-prototypes/#comment-154275</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1885#comment-154275</guid>
		<description>Yeah -- I love the idea of other people having OnStar.  :-)


But for me?  No -- my privacy is a blurry balance, but it&#039;s pretty clear that handing off so much of personal information to a giant multinational corporation is beyond what my personal sense of privacy will allow -- even though I&#039;m pretty sure nobody would ever look at it.

Heck, I thought it was creepy when a far-away Ford callcenter rang me to remind me of a 115k-mile service.  It would have been fine if it had been someone at my Ford local dealership(we have a 2-way relationship and trust them with my safety), but the big callcenter in the sky&#039;s model of my driving had produced a disturbingly accurate guess of my odometer reading -- even though I hadn&#039;t been to the dealer in months.  It took me a while to remember that my local dealer must obviously be sharing their service database with Ford Motor Company.  As I said, creepy.

And OnStar is even creepier than that.

But really, I want my car to just be a car -- so that I can relax and take off my computer-security hat on my way home from work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8212; I love the idea of other people having OnStar.  <img src='http://gm-volt.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But for me?  No &#8212; my privacy is a blurry balance, but it&#8217;s pretty clear that handing off so much of personal information to a giant multinational corporation is beyond what my personal sense of privacy will allow &#8212; even though I&#8217;m pretty sure nobody would ever look at it.</p>
<p>Heck, I thought it was creepy when a far-away Ford callcenter rang me to remind me of a 115k-mile service.  It would have been fine if it had been someone at my Ford local dealership(we have a 2-way relationship and trust them with my safety), but the big callcenter in the sky&#8217;s model of my driving had produced a disturbingly accurate guess of my odometer reading &#8212; even though I hadn&#8217;t been to the dealer in months.  It took me a while to remember that my local dealer must obviously be sharing their service database with Ford Motor Company.  As I said, creepy.</p>
<p>And OnStar is even creepier than that.</p>
<p>But really, I want my car to just be a car &#8212; so that I can relax and take off my computer-security hat on my way home from work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayCee</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/10/21/gm-reveals-onstar-ev-lab-which-connects-to-chevy-volt-prototypes/#comment-154136</link>
		<dc:creator>JayCee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1885#comment-154136</guid>
		<description>I do not want On-Star. Too nosey. They need to make that an option and not a standard or provide the information to remove the on-star feature set from the vehicle. I agree with the KISS process. GM keeps doing things that are more and more making me reconsider purchasing a Volt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not want On-Star. Too nosey. They need to make that an option and not a standard or provide the information to remove the on-star feature set from the vehicle. I agree with the KISS process. GM keeps doing things that are more and more making me reconsider purchasing a Volt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/10/21/gm-reveals-onstar-ev-lab-which-connects-to-chevy-volt-prototypes/#comment-153907</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1885#comment-153907</guid>
		<description>As a software developer I like to, behind the scenes, save &quot;usage&quot; info so that we can analyse which features are being used, by whom, and how often (corporate industrial software, not public personal stuff). For eample &quot;how often do users use the &quot;undo&quot; feature?&quot; (the &quot;undo&quot; feature is a big pain in the neck to develop and code).

I can imagine that the auto companies would love to be able to collect all kinds of data about a car&#039;s usage in the real world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a software developer I like to, behind the scenes, save &#8220;usage&#8221; info so that we can analyse which features are being used, by whom, and how often (corporate industrial software, not public personal stuff). For eample &#8220;how often do users use the &#8220;undo&#8221; feature?&#8221; (the &#8220;undo&#8221; feature is a big pain in the neck to develop and code).</p>
<p>I can imagine that the auto companies would love to be able to collect all kinds of data about a car&#8217;s usage in the real world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Park</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/10/21/gm-reveals-onstar-ev-lab-which-connects-to-chevy-volt-prototypes/#comment-153809</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1885#comment-153809</guid>
		<description>Dave:

Where did you hear that about the price of the Volt?  Do you mean before the tax credit?  If true, that&#039;s the biggest news of the year.

As to the percentages of strong hybrids, PHEVs and EVs, God send that it shall be true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave:</p>
<p>Where did you hear that about the price of the Volt?  Do you mean before the tax credit?  If true, that&#8217;s the biggest news of the year.</p>
<p>As to the percentages of strong hybrids, PHEVs and EVs, God send that it shall be true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 409/409 objects using apc

Served from: gm-volt.com @ 2012-05-26 03:04:37 -->
