<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting an Early Chevy Volt in 2010 Won&#8217;t be Easy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/08/27/getting-an-early-chevy-volt-in-2010-wont-be-easy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/08/27/getting-an-early-chevy-volt-in-2010-wont-be-easy/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: akojim</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/08/27/getting-an-early-chevy-volt-in-2010-wont-be-easy/#comment-142132</link>
		<dc:creator>akojim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1796#comment-142132</guid>
		<description>By the time the Volt actually becomes available for purchase, it will be an obsolete $40,000 curiosity. Seems like no matter how hard they try, assuming they really are trying, GM just can’t seem to make it past “we came really close this time”.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the time the Volt actually becomes available for purchase, it will be an obsolete $40,000 curiosity. Seems like no matter how hard they try, assuming they really are trying, GM just can’t seem to make it past “we came really close this time”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chevonly</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/08/27/getting-an-early-chevy-volt-in-2010-wont-be-easy/#comment-141368</link>
		<dc:creator>Chevonly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1796#comment-141368</guid>
		<description>Ok why not make life a little interesting, how about a lottery, to show your serious a ten grand deposit to enter the lottery to purchase a new Volt, and for those of us who don&#039;t win we get our deposit back but we get put on the list for the next production run. Any other ideas out there??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok why not make life a little interesting, how about a lottery, to show your serious a ten grand deposit to enter the lottery to purchase a new Volt, and for those of us who don&#8217;t win we get our deposit back but we get put on the list for the next production run. Any other ideas out there??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xiaowei1</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/08/27/getting-an-early-chevy-volt-in-2010-wont-be-easy/#comment-141263</link>
		<dc:creator>Xiaowei1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1796#comment-141263</guid>
		<description>You are absolutely correct, both are better than one. The argument was however childish - which one will have the bigger impact. Obviously it is the Prius because of numbers. This is what I was pointing out when argument to the contrary was made. For the environment, combined, there is an even greater benefit.

From a company point of view, a sale to Prius is not a good thing for GM as its a potentially lost sale. Capping production simply pushes people to the enemy and boosts profits for them allowing for more investment (by them). Truth be told, neither company cares about the environment unless its good for sales. a company is a creature devoted to returning the best profit for their share holders- this is their fiduciary duty, the environment is only a consideration of regulations, and public image to assist in the profit taking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely correct, both are better than one. The argument was however childish &#8211; which one will have the bigger impact. Obviously it is the Prius because of numbers. This is what I was pointing out when argument to the contrary was made. For the environment, combined, there is an even greater benefit.</p>
<p>From a company point of view, a sale to Prius is not a good thing for GM as its a potentially lost sale. Capping production simply pushes people to the enemy and boosts profits for them allowing for more investment (by them). Truth be told, neither company cares about the environment unless its good for sales. a company is a creature devoted to returning the best profit for their share holders- this is their fiduciary duty, the environment is only a consideration of regulations, and public image to assist in the profit taking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koz</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/08/27/getting-an-early-chevy-volt-in-2010-wont-be-easy/#comment-141243</link>
		<dc:creator>koz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1796#comment-141243</guid>
		<description>Sorry to be blunt, but I understood perfectly the arguments. I just felt they are a bit childish and misguiding (similar to misguided but subtly different). It is not a good/bad or right/wrong scenario, but rather 2 goods. What is the point of trying to contrast the society benefits of 2011 poduction volumes? 

Again, I&#039;ll repeat, it is not an either scenario. Both companies will independently produce and sell their vehicle. Chevy plans to produce ~10k 2011 Volts regardless of what Toyato does with Prius. Likewise, Toyota has production volume plans regardless of Chevy&#039;s Volt plans. Whatever each volume of each vehicle is sold will work together in raising the national fleet mpg.

My point is that each Volt sold will produce the equivalent benefit of 3-4 non-plug Prii. I wish there could be 400k Volts to go along with 400K Prii in 2011, but that won&#039;t and cannot happen. So what? That doesn&#039;t deminish the benefit of each Volt sold or detract from the longer term benefits of the Volt program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to be blunt, but I understood perfectly the arguments. I just felt they are a bit childish and misguiding (similar to misguided but subtly different). It is not a good/bad or right/wrong scenario, but rather 2 goods. What is the point of trying to contrast the society benefits of 2011 poduction volumes? </p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;ll repeat, it is not an either scenario. Both companies will independently produce and sell their vehicle. Chevy plans to produce ~10k 2011 Volts regardless of what Toyato does with Prius. Likewise, Toyota has production volume plans regardless of Chevy&#8217;s Volt plans. Whatever each volume of each vehicle is sold will work together in raising the national fleet mpg.</p>
<p>My point is that each Volt sold will produce the equivalent benefit of 3-4 non-plug Prii. I wish there could be 400k Volts to go along with 400K Prii in 2011, but that won&#8217;t and cannot happen. So what? That doesn&#8217;t deminish the benefit of each Volt sold or detract from the longer term benefits of the Volt program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuclearboy</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/08/27/getting-an-early-chevy-volt-in-2010-wont-be-easy/#comment-141222</link>
		<dc:creator>nuclearboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1796#comment-141222</guid>
		<description>The key here is battery size.  All of the other gas electrics, including GMs previous hybrids, have relatively tiny batteries when compared to the Volt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key here is battery size.  All of the other gas electrics, including GMs previous hybrids, have relatively tiny batteries when compared to the Volt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
