Comments on: Getting an Early Chevy Volt in 2010 Won’t be Easy

By: Craig Boyd

Craig Boyd — Sun, 04 Apr 2010 17:23:47 +0000

Very informing post. I recommend this realistic pussy and ass if you want an overwhelming experience. The holes are really realistic and tight and the very real look and feel is, to be honest better than the real thing - it feels like real vaginal and anal sex. Have a look at at www.realisticvaginaandass.com - it's a great price too and well worth it. You won't need any other male sex toy and it beats any fleshlight or tenga for realism. I think of it all day at work and when I get home I can't wait to use it. Good luck...

By: akojim

akojim — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:59:27 +0000

By the time the Volt actually becomes available for purchase, it will be an obsolete $40,000 curiosity. Seems like no matter how hard they try, assuming they really are trying, GM just can’t seem to make it past “we came really close this time”.

By: Chevonly

Chevonly — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:09:17 +0000

Ok why not make life a little interesting, how about a lottery, to show your serious a ten grand deposit to enter the lottery to purchase a new Volt, and for those of us who don’t win we get our deposit back but we get put on the list for the next production run. Any other ideas out there??

By: Xiaowei1

Xiaowei1 — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:24:23 +0000

You are absolutely correct, both are better than one. The argument was however childish – which one will have the bigger impact. Obviously it is the Prius because of numbers. This is what I was pointing out when argument to the contrary was made. For the environment, combined, there is an even greater benefit.

From a company point of view, a sale to Prius is not a good thing for GM as its a potentially lost sale. Capping production simply pushes people to the enemy and boosts profits for them allowing for more investment (by them). Truth be told, neither company cares about the environment unless its good for sales. a company is a creature devoted to returning the best profit for their share holders- this is their fiduciary duty, the environment is only a consideration of regulations, and public image to assist in the profit taking.

By: koz

koz — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:01:54 +0000

Sorry to be blunt, but I understood perfectly the arguments. I just felt they are a bit childish and misguiding (similar to misguided but subtly different). It is not a good/bad or right/wrong scenario, but rather 2 goods. What is the point of trying to contrast the society benefits of 2011 poduction volumes?

Again, I’ll repeat, it is not an either scenario. Both companies will independently produce and sell their vehicle. Chevy plans to produce ~10k 2011 Volts regardless of what Toyato does with Prius. Likewise, Toyota has production volume plans regardless of Chevy’s Volt plans. Whatever each volume of each vehicle is sold will work together in raising the national fleet mpg.

My point is that each Volt sold will produce the equivalent benefit of 3-4 non-plug Prii. I wish there could be 400k Volts to go along with 400K Prii in 2011, but that won’t and cannot happen. So what? That doesn’t deminish the benefit of each Volt sold or detract from the longer term benefits of the Volt program.