<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frank Weber Says Chevy Volt is Necessary and Relevant For Energy Independence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:07:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: edward richardson</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/#comment-149024</link>
		<dc:creator>edward richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1684#comment-149024</guid>
		<description>how come over two years ago when i contacted gm over my design of producing the car i developed using an electric engine with a small motor to generate a system to re charge that produced over 250mpg your resurch and development team said it was not a good idea and less than one year after that look what you have stolen from me good going thats the american way thanks gm and you wonder why your sales are down alleast with imports you know where your money is going all i want to know why you would not buy the design off of me 2 years ago i am a simple man with 3 kids and have worked on cars all my life it is my passion and i had a great idea and still have paper work and freinds that have heard my idea that supposably you or you development team tought up ha! after they talked to me and i explained in detail i guess it was a good idea after all thanks for shafting people that call you with a great idea and you STEAL IT FROM THEM any one that would like to hear how gm came up with there brain storm of the 250 mpg volt call me edward richardson at 301 343 9789 thanks to all and have a great day hope everyone reads this letter and see how wrong general motors treats there comsumers i have owned gm products from the time i got my license and restored a couple to i am so dissapointed at how crooked they are it was not your IDEA IT WAS MINE . thanks edward richardson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how come over two years ago when i contacted gm over my design of producing the car i developed using an electric engine with a small motor to generate a system to re charge that produced over 250mpg your resurch and development team said it was not a good idea and less than one year after that look what you have stolen from me good going thats the american way thanks gm and you wonder why your sales are down alleast with imports you know where your money is going all i want to know why you would not buy the design off of me 2 years ago i am a simple man with 3 kids and have worked on cars all my life it is my passion and i had a great idea and still have paper work and freinds that have heard my idea that supposably you or you development team tought up ha! after they talked to me and i explained in detail i guess it was a good idea after all thanks for shafting people that call you with a great idea and you STEAL IT FROM THEM any one that would like to hear how gm came up with there brain storm of the 250 mpg volt call me edward richardson at 301 343 9789 thanks to all and have a great day hope everyone reads this letter and see how wrong general motors treats there comsumers i have owned gm products from the time i got my license and restored a couple to i am so dissapointed at how crooked they are it was not your IDEA IT WAS MINE . thanks edward richardson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie h</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/#comment-116869</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1684#comment-116869</guid>
		<description>&quot;Consider this scenario: a customer walks into a dealership, on the right you have a quiet, clean, eco-friendly car that never needs gas and hardly ever needs repair (few moving parts, no heat, oil, exhaust, fuel delivery etc) and on the left you have a backwards, expensive, destructive, soon-to-be-obsolete vehicle that’s hyper expensive to fuel and will break down. What kind of fool would opt for the latter?&quot;

You didn&#039;t mention price.  Are they equal in price?  If not, what kind of fool would spend an extra $K where incremental value returned is $J, (J, K are positive real numbers with J &lt;&lt; K).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Consider this scenario: a customer walks into a dealership, on the right you have a quiet, clean, eco-friendly car that never needs gas and hardly ever needs repair (few moving parts, no heat, oil, exhaust, fuel delivery etc) and on the left you have a backwards, expensive, destructive, soon-to-be-obsolete vehicle that’s hyper expensive to fuel and will break down. What kind of fool would opt for the latter?&#8221;</p>
<p>You didn&#8217;t mention price.  Are they equal in price?  If not, what kind of fool would spend an extra $K where incremental value returned is $J, (J, K are positive real numbers with J &lt;&lt; K).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfed Simmons</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/#comment-116848</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfed Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1684#comment-116848</guid>
		<description>Once the electric vehicle becomes readily available it will quickly overtake all other vehicles in it&#039;s class. 

Consider this scenario: a customer walks into a dealership, on the right you have a quiet, clean, eco-friendly car that never needs gas and hardly ever needs repair (few moving parts, no heat, oil, exhaust, fuel delivery etc) and on the left you have a backwards, expensive, destructive, soon-to-be-obsolete vehicle that&#039;s hyper expensive to fuel and will break down. What kind of fool would opt for the latter? 

Despite the incredibly successful efforts by Big Oil to sabotage this it will come to pass, and when it does oil cars are going the way of the cotton gin. 

Now how about some fast and quiet electric boats?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once the electric vehicle becomes readily available it will quickly overtake all other vehicles in it&#8217;s class. </p>
<p>Consider this scenario: a customer walks into a dealership, on the right you have a quiet, clean, eco-friendly car that never needs gas and hardly ever needs repair (few moving parts, no heat, oil, exhaust, fuel delivery etc) and on the left you have a backwards, expensive, destructive, soon-to-be-obsolete vehicle that&#8217;s hyper expensive to fuel and will break down. What kind of fool would opt for the latter? </p>
<p>Despite the incredibly successful efforts by Big Oil to sabotage this it will come to pass, and when it does oil cars are going the way of the cotton gin. </p>
<p>Now how about some fast and quiet electric boats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CS Guy</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/#comment-116553</link>
		<dc:creator>CS Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1684#comment-116553</guid>
		<description>Now that GM and Chrysler know that going along with the oil companies wish to have all vehicles get crappy gas mileage brings them nothing but bankruptcy...

Here&#039;s a link about the 100MPG Hummer, was to be unveiled in detroit in April…

&quot;The prototype we&#039;ll see in Detroit at the Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress on Monday features a series-hybrid drive train similar to the Voltec system in the Chevrolet Volt. Like the Volt, the H3 will be driven solely by electricity. The engine — the 260-horsepower 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder used in the Pontiac Solstice — will drive a 100-kilowatt generator to recharge the three lithium-ion battery packs. Fisker Automotive is using the same engine in its Karma range-extended EV.&quot;
Link to wired story:
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/04/behold-americas/

also their video: http://www.rasertech.com/media/videos/hummer-fuel-economy-explained

This just shows it is doable to drive a badazz rig and get excellent fuel economy. I bet this thing will cost a mint but as a first step (or for those with buckets of money now) it is a reminder of what America can do when we put our mind to it!

We&#039;re rooting for you GM and Chrysler. We know you can build great cars when you want to. Now is the time for you to show America that you are our partner in getting off oil. The 100MPG Hummer just shows that cars don&#039;t have to be cramped or crummy to get great mileage.

NPNS::Electric Cars + Nuclear Power + Solar + Wind + Geothermal = American Energy Independence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that GM and Chrysler know that going along with the oil companies wish to have all vehicles get crappy gas mileage brings them nothing but bankruptcy&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link about the 100MPG Hummer, was to be unveiled in detroit in April…</p>
<p>&#8220;The prototype we&#8217;ll see in Detroit at the Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress on Monday features a series-hybrid drive train similar to the Voltec system in the Chevrolet Volt. Like the Volt, the H3 will be driven solely by electricity. The engine — the 260-horsepower 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder used in the Pontiac Solstice — will drive a 100-kilowatt generator to recharge the three lithium-ion battery packs. Fisker Automotive is using the same engine in its Karma range-extended EV.&#8221;<br />
Link to wired story:<br />
<a href="http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/04/behold-americas/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/04/behold-americas/</a></p>
<p>also their video: <a href="http://www.rasertech.com/media/videos/hummer-fuel-economy-explained" rel="nofollow">http://www.rasertech.com/media/videos/hummer-fuel-economy-explained</a></p>
<p>This just shows it is doable to drive a badazz rig and get excellent fuel economy. I bet this thing will cost a mint but as a first step (or for those with buckets of money now) it is a reminder of what America can do when we put our mind to it!</p>
<p>We&#8217;re rooting for you GM and Chrysler. We know you can build great cars when you want to. Now is the time for you to show America that you are our partner in getting off oil. The 100MPG Hummer just shows that cars don&#8217;t have to be cramped or crummy to get great mileage.</p>
<p>NPNS::Electric Cars + Nuclear Power + Solar + Wind + Geothermal = American Energy Independence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/#comment-116526</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1684#comment-116526</guid>
		<description>GM needs to hit a homerun with large volumes of affordable Volt.  Start the massive manufacturing of the bodies now, and have a menu of battery options that can be chosen by the consumer and their affordability means.  Have a &quot;starter&quot; version with maybe cheaper lead acid type batteries, just to drastically reduce the cost.  The the owner can upgrade later as battery technologies get better and cheaper.  I would buy one, even if it only went 5 miles on battery, as long as the range extender engine could get me 50 mpg.  Start it at 20K and kill off the Prius and Insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM needs to hit a homerun with large volumes of affordable Volt.  Start the massive manufacturing of the bodies now, and have a menu of battery options that can be chosen by the consumer and their affordability means.  Have a &#8220;starter&#8221; version with maybe cheaper lead acid type batteries, just to drastically reduce the cost.  The the owner can upgrade later as battery technologies get better and cheaper.  I would buy one, even if it only went 5 miles on battery, as long as the range extender engine could get me 50 mpg.  Start it at 20K and kill off the Prius and Insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Grubb</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/#comment-116405</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Grubb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1684#comment-116405</guid>
		<description>The Volt is quite brilliant in terms of it&#039;s market positioning.

Hybrids will continue to sell well, but people are going to start demanding more.

Plugins are the next evolutionary step with hybrids given that the price to charge up is so much cheaper than burning gas--even with today&#039;s temporarily cheap gas.

EVs are the future. No doubt at all in my mind. EVs are 75% efficient while ICEs are 20% efficient. Maintenance costs are going to be significantly reduced with EVs, and I suspect interiors will wear out much faster than motors, controllers or even batteries.

However, rangephobia will remain until a recharging network can evolve, and it&#039;s going to take time to build it--but far less time than for the hype of hydrogen to evolve into something viable.

Enter the series hybrid, or Volt. It pushes us closer to EVs than anything else out there. As the batteries improve, 60, 80, 100 mile AER will become possible with the Voltec powertrain. If ultracaps are added or used, then recharge times may drop to minutes. The technical challenges to evolve a vehicle from series hybrid to EV are probably the smallest of any other such evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Volt is quite brilliant in terms of it&#8217;s market positioning.</p>
<p>Hybrids will continue to sell well, but people are going to start demanding more.</p>
<p>Plugins are the next evolutionary step with hybrids given that the price to charge up is so much cheaper than burning gas&#8211;even with today&#8217;s temporarily cheap gas.</p>
<p>EVs are the future. No doubt at all in my mind. EVs are 75% efficient while ICEs are 20% efficient. Maintenance costs are going to be significantly reduced with EVs, and I suspect interiors will wear out much faster than motors, controllers or even batteries.</p>
<p>However, rangephobia will remain until a recharging network can evolve, and it&#8217;s going to take time to build it&#8211;but far less time than for the hype of hydrogen to evolve into something viable.</p>
<p>Enter the series hybrid, or Volt. It pushes us closer to EVs than anything else out there. As the batteries improve, 60, 80, 100 mile AER will become possible with the Voltec powertrain. If ultracaps are added or used, then recharge times may drop to minutes. The technical challenges to evolve a vehicle from series hybrid to EV are probably the smallest of any other such evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: statik</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/#comment-115994</link>
		<dc:creator>statik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 15:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1684#comment-115994</guid>
		<description>#155 JEC said:

For you iMiev lovers (me too!):
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/05/mitsubishi-i-miev-electric-car-second-battery-factory-kyoto.php
=============================

Thats what I love about the iMiev project, not only do they hit all their deadlines, not only do they have over 1,000 &#039;pre-production/test&#039; vehicles on the road now, and not only are they going into full, real production in 6 weeks...but they are also constantly bringing in more capacity, and constantly increasing volumes as the time to make good decreases....a trend that is woefully lacking anywhere else in this segment.

There is just something about the EV business that screams &#039;BS,&#039; I don&#039;t know if it is because of so many failed projects, or just so many darn press releases and concept cars compared to exactly zero mass produced EVs on the road at the moment.

It is no secret that I love the iMiev project, and it is my first choice...but even if you don&#039;t like it at all, and would never buy one, they are going to be the ones that prove to the world that, &#039;yes, EVs are real, you can buy one at your local dealer, you can have warranty and service without hassle, just like a regular car...and they can have 4 seats.

/that can&#039;t be a bad thing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#155 JEC said:</p>
<p>For you iMiev lovers (me too!):<br />
<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/05/mitsubishi-i-miev-electric-car-second-battery-factory-kyoto.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/05/mitsubishi-i-miev-electric-car-second-battery-factory-kyoto.php</a><br />
=============================</p>
<p>Thats what I love about the iMiev project, not only do they hit all their deadlines, not only do they have over 1,000 &#8216;pre-production/test&#8217; vehicles on the road now, and not only are they going into full, real production in 6 weeks&#8230;but they are also constantly bringing in more capacity, and constantly increasing volumes as the time to make good decreases&#8230;.a trend that is woefully lacking anywhere else in this segment.</p>
<p>There is just something about the EV business that screams &#8216;BS,&#8217; I don&#8217;t know if it is because of so many failed projects, or just so many darn press releases and concept cars compared to exactly zero mass produced EVs on the road at the moment.</p>
<p>It is no secret that I love the iMiev project, and it is my first choice&#8230;but even if you don&#8217;t like it at all, and would never buy one, they are going to be the ones that prove to the world that, &#8216;yes, EVs are real, you can buy one at your local dealer, you can have warranty and service without hassle, just like a regular car&#8230;and they can have 4 seats.</p>
<p>/that can&#8217;t be a bad thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: statik</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/#comment-115992</link>
		<dc:creator>statik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 15:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1684#comment-115992</guid>
		<description>#146 jeffhre
yupe

#147 DonC
...so noted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#146 jeffhre<br />
yupe</p>
<p>#147 DonC<br />
&#8230;so noted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEC</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/#comment-115984</link>
		<dc:creator>JEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 14:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1684#comment-115984</guid>
		<description>DanP
&quot;(As I understand it, it makes a very loud “bang” if the disconnect swing-arms of the system are commanded to disconnect any inappropriately-timed electricity generation input that the system can not handle, or has not otherwise properly-responded to the extremely tight one-sixtieth of a second specificities of the grid).&quot;
=====================================================
Huh?  You lost me.  One-sixieth of a second?  Are you talking about zero-crossover condition?  Where you attempt to disconnect from an inductive source (system wiring), and you create a giant electrical arc?  I do not think you will find any mechanical switch that would be able to achieve this.  If you could open the switch at EXACTLY the zero crossing of the current, then you would be able to interrupt the current with no arc (impossible with mechanical relay).

Take a look here at a demo of a BIG switch that attempts to remove power.  Since you are connected to a large inductive load (L), and you attempt to disconnect the Current (I) instantly, then theoretically, your voltage goes to infinity.  This causes the large arc, since V = L(di/dt), where di/dt is the change in current over time.  If dt = small, then V = BIG, and therefore the switch attempts to maintain current (I) and makes the large arc you can see in the video (I have posted this several times, as my favorite demo of L(di/dt) in action!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQQMK1Rvq0A&amp;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DanP<br />
&#8220;(As I understand it, it makes a very loud “bang” if the disconnect swing-arms of the system are commanded to disconnect any inappropriately-timed electricity generation input that the system can not handle, or has not otherwise properly-responded to the extremely tight one-sixtieth of a second specificities of the grid).&#8221;<br />
=====================================================<br />
Huh?  You lost me.  One-sixieth of a second?  Are you talking about zero-crossover condition?  Where you attempt to disconnect from an inductive source (system wiring), and you create a giant electrical arc?  I do not think you will find any mechanical switch that would be able to achieve this.  If you could open the switch at EXACTLY the zero crossing of the current, then you would be able to interrupt the current with no arc (impossible with mechanical relay).</p>
<p>Take a look here at a demo of a BIG switch that attempts to remove power.  Since you are connected to a large inductive load (L), and you attempt to disconnect the Current (I) instantly, then theoretically, your voltage goes to infinity.  This causes the large arc, since V = L(di/dt), where di/dt is the change in current over time.  If dt = small, then V = BIG, and therefore the switch attempts to maintain current (I) and makes the large arc you can see in the video (I have posted this several times, as my favorite demo of L(di/dt) in action!)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQQMK1Rvq0A&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQQMK1Rvq0A&amp;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Petit</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/29/frank-weber-says-chevy-volt-is-necessary-and-relevant-for-energy-independence/#comment-115980</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Petit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 14:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1684#comment-115980</guid>
		<description>As the time of the Volt release gets closer and closer,  expect louder and louder proclamations that &quot;it won&#039;t do enough good for the energy cost increase&quot; from the petro-dictatorial interests.
  Scream fear and smear against governmental initiatives which will help the Voltec all they wish, it is all coming.  People are highly motivated to keep their current ICE transportation going as best they can afford in anticipation of Voltec.
As far as the made-up excuses that petroleum is key to national defense, well, the Volt is key to national defense, jobs, environmental responsibility of each and every one of us, and a host of other absolutely responsible reasons. 

 &quot;Cost of energy increase&quot; is a completely dysfunctional and totally worthless argument.  (Less than a hundred &quot;conservatives&quot;[sic] are denying the ease and need for electricity &quot;conservation&quot;, and, I reject any ever-present denial completely.)
  If ever
 there was only one thing,
 and one thing alone
 which we morally should (and must) pay a little more for 
and use a lot less of, it is:
Energy, which, 
****************
SHOULD
****************
cost more if it is sustainably-derived in a non-carbon manner.
 Many people with vast square footages in all their mansions want cheap coal electricity.    They are the very ones who can afford the 10 to 15 percent more for it if it did get that high, since that is the square footage they chose to buy in the first place.
 I have a modest 1483 square foot house.  I have gotten my electricity usage down to 386 kilowatts a month!!  The hottest month on record was last July.  I perfected a way to be very cool in my energy-efficient/weatherized  house for only that many kilowatts for that month here in Texas!!  (Using a 2 hour timer on the hvac,  hvac tech installed, and setting it to better &quot;accumulate the cool&quot;, then automatically shutting it off for the evening, instead of cycling an inefficiently narrow temp band).
 These FEW people in opposition, are people to be identified as petroleum and coal interests, and no-one else at all !! NO ONE ELSE AT ALL!!
They know this is a threat to them, that Voltec is ascendant.  They likely will try to attempt to see how they can escalate their veiled, if not direct threats to everyone else, (not just directly to me, twice now, in the last 2 years). (The second being from natural gas interests, which, does not make sense to me since it is half the carbon of coal, and is needed for stand-by electrical generation.  Also, it seems to me, it is at least minimally-energy-appropriate/required, since it can be used most extremely-frugally, therefore natural gas is ok for that reason).
 But, again and again, the same tired old theme of increased energy cost, however, will become increasingly more and more false.
  Do you realize that as more and more Wind Energy comes online, that the &quot;fuel&quot; portion of your electric bill could actually begin to disappear in the next few decades?
  It is conceivable that the coal electric  generation facilities in 20 years may actually have to pay money into the system to have the  privilege of being able to maintain being physically connected.
(As I understand it, it makes a very loud &quot;bang&quot; if the disconnect swing-arms of the system are commanded to disconnect any inappropriately-timed electricity generation input that the system can not handle, or has not otherwise properly-responded to the extremely tight one-sixtieth of a second specificities of the grid).   
 This is why the economics of coal are rapidly going down the tubes.
This is why no-one, for the long term, ought to consider building new coal fired power plants.   Why?
 If I can conserve electricity to the extent that I can, then so, can anyone else who merely takes the very easy path to also do so.
 Everything we can save can go toward the affordability of us getting that Volt.  (Just don&#039;t neglect your preventive maintenance on your current auto, so as to prevent a huge consequential loss later).
  Dan Petit Austin TX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the time of the Volt release gets closer and closer,  expect louder and louder proclamations that &#8220;it won&#8217;t do enough good for the energy cost increase&#8221; from the petro-dictatorial interests.<br />
  Scream fear and smear against governmental initiatives which will help the Voltec all they wish, it is all coming.  People are highly motivated to keep their current ICE transportation going as best they can afford in anticipation of Voltec.<br />
As far as the made-up excuses that petroleum is key to national defense, well, the Volt is key to national defense, jobs, environmental responsibility of each and every one of us, and a host of other absolutely responsible reasons. </p>
<p> &#8220;Cost of energy increase&#8221; is a completely dysfunctional and totally worthless argument.  (Less than a hundred &#8220;conservatives&#8221;[sic] are denying the ease and need for electricity &#8220;conservation&#8221;, and, I reject any ever-present denial completely.)<br />
  If ever<br />
 there was only one thing,<br />
 and one thing alone<br />
 which we morally should (and must) pay a little more for<br />
and use a lot less of, it is:<br />
Energy, which,<br />
****************<br />
SHOULD<br />
****************<br />
cost more if it is sustainably-derived in a non-carbon manner.<br />
 Many people with vast square footages in all their mansions want cheap coal electricity.    They are the very ones who can afford the 10 to 15 percent more for it if it did get that high, since that is the square footage they chose to buy in the first place.<br />
 I have a modest 1483 square foot house.  I have gotten my electricity usage down to 386 kilowatts a month!!  The hottest month on record was last July.  I perfected a way to be very cool in my energy-efficient/weatherized  house for only that many kilowatts for that month here in Texas!!  (Using a 2 hour timer on the hvac,  hvac tech installed, and setting it to better &#8220;accumulate the cool&#8221;, then automatically shutting it off for the evening, instead of cycling an inefficiently narrow temp band).<br />
 These FEW people in opposition, are people to be identified as petroleum and coal interests, and no-one else at all !! NO ONE ELSE AT ALL!!<br />
They know this is a threat to them, that Voltec is ascendant.  They likely will try to attempt to see how they can escalate their veiled, if not direct threats to everyone else, (not just directly to me, twice now, in the last 2 years). (The second being from natural gas interests, which, does not make sense to me since it is half the carbon of coal, and is needed for stand-by electrical generation.  Also, it seems to me, it is at least minimally-energy-appropriate/required, since it can be used most extremely-frugally, therefore natural gas is ok for that reason).<br />
 But, again and again, the same tired old theme of increased energy cost, however, will become increasingly more and more false.<br />
  Do you realize that as more and more Wind Energy comes online, that the &#8220;fuel&#8221; portion of your electric bill could actually begin to disappear in the next few decades?<br />
  It is conceivable that the coal electric  generation facilities in 20 years may actually have to pay money into the system to have the  privilege of being able to maintain being physically connected.<br />
(As I understand it, it makes a very loud &#8220;bang&#8221; if the disconnect swing-arms of the system are commanded to disconnect any inappropriately-timed electricity generation input that the system can not handle, or has not otherwise properly-responded to the extremely tight one-sixtieth of a second specificities of the grid).<br />
 This is why the economics of coal are rapidly going down the tubes.<br />
This is why no-one, for the long term, ought to consider building new coal fired power plants.   Why?<br />
 If I can conserve electricity to the extent that I can, then so, can anyone else who merely takes the very easy path to also do so.<br />
 Everything we can save can go toward the affordability of us getting that Volt.  (Just don&#8217;t neglect your preventive maintenance on your current auto, so as to prevent a huge consequential loss later).<br />
  Dan Petit Austin TX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.399 seconds -->
