<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM&#8217;s Unnamed 2-Mode Plug-in Hybrid to Enter Test Fleets in 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/06/gms-unnamed-2-mode-plug-in-hybrid-to-enter-test-fleets-in-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/06/gms-unnamed-2-mode-plug-in-hybrid-to-enter-test-fleets-in-2011/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:24:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry McFall</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/06/gms-unnamed-2-mode-plug-in-hybrid-to-enter-test-fleets-in-2011/#comment-119177</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry McFall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1652#comment-119177</guid>
		<description>Is there a good purpose of messaging the 2-Mode Plug-in &quot;Hybrid&quot;? When GM has and appears doing great things with VOLTEC, why spend the effort on another item on the electrical technology spectrum!.

GM does not want to get involved into a lot of broad issues for the sake of having &quot;Something for Everybody&quot;. I believe GM is on a roll with VOLTEC and should assure that it is appropriately funded with their limited resources before, the government starts inappropriate input.

I know that we tax payers hold a large stake in the business but, I believe in GM and that they can modernize and come out on top. Just with the concept of the VOLT being so dynamic and getting broad attention is testimony in itself of their capabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a good purpose of messaging the 2-Mode Plug-in &#8220;Hybrid&#8221;? When GM has and appears doing great things with VOLTEC, why spend the effort on another item on the electrical technology spectrum!.</p>
<p>GM does not want to get involved into a lot of broad issues for the sake of having &#8220;Something for Everybody&#8221;. I believe GM is on a roll with VOLTEC and should assure that it is appropriately funded with their limited resources before, the government starts inappropriate input.</p>
<p>I know that we tax payers hold a large stake in the business but, I believe in GM and that they can modernize and come out on top. Just with the concept of the VOLT being so dynamic and getting broad attention is testimony in itself of their capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM’s Unnamed 2-Mode Plug-in Hybrid to Enter Test Fleets in 2011 &#124; Car Blog Green</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/06/gms-unnamed-2-mode-plug-in-hybrid-to-enter-test-fleets-in-2011/#comment-112496</link>
		<dc:creator>GM’s Unnamed 2-Mode Plug-in Hybrid to Enter Test Fleets in 2011 &#124; Car Blog Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 20:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1652#comment-112496</guid>
		<description>[...] post: GM’s Unnamed 2-Mode Plug-in Hybrid to Enter Test Fleets in 2011  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: GM’s Unnamed 2-Mode Plug-in Hybrid to Enter Test Fleets in 2011  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koz</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/06/gms-unnamed-2-mode-plug-in-hybrid-to-enter-test-fleets-in-2011/#comment-112053</link>
		<dc:creator>koz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 11:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1652#comment-112053</guid>
		<description>Herm #135

&quot;The modular packs will also have to meet the 10 year warranty.. its the law in several states.

I hink its ridiculous.&quot;

This is a widespread misunderstanding. The 10 year&#039;s comes from California and the other states (?) are only duplicating their policy. It&#039;s not a law altogether. It is a rule to allow a hybrid like the Prius to quilify as a PZEV. It is acutally a well intentioned rule to insure that a car requiring a battery to qualify for a PZEV actually has that battery functioning. It does not apply to BEV&#039;s and I don&#039;t believe it should (will?) apply to an EREV like the Volt. There is another common misconception that people will not but a EV that the battery won&#039;t last at least 10 years. This is what GM is cowtowing to and it IS rediculous. The only mass produced EV doesn&#039;t have a 10+ year battery and they are performing quite well in their segment. Ultimately, it is $/(lifetime KWH) that matters. 

I don&#039;t want to spend extra $ for battery capacity to cover the calendar any more than necessary. Why would anybody. Especially in a deflationary battery market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herm #135</p>
<p>&#8220;The modular packs will also have to meet the 10 year warranty.. its the law in several states.</p>
<p>I hink its ridiculous.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a widespread misunderstanding. The 10 year&#8217;s comes from California and the other states (?) are only duplicating their policy. It&#8217;s not a law altogether. It is a rule to allow a hybrid like the Prius to quilify as a PZEV. It is acutally a well intentioned rule to insure that a car requiring a battery to qualify for a PZEV actually has that battery functioning. It does not apply to BEV&#8217;s and I don&#8217;t believe it should (will?) apply to an EREV like the Volt. There is another common misconception that people will not but a EV that the battery won&#8217;t last at least 10 years. This is what GM is cowtowing to and it IS rediculous. The only mass produced EV doesn&#8217;t have a 10+ year battery and they are performing quite well in their segment. Ultimately, it is $/(lifetime KWH) that matters. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to spend extra $ for battery capacity to cover the calendar any more than necessary. Why would anybody. Especially in a deflationary battery market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herm</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/06/gms-unnamed-2-mode-plug-in-hybrid-to-enter-test-fleets-in-2011/#comment-111999</link>
		<dc:creator>Herm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1652#comment-111999</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I do.. perhaps for a battery that is in a thermally stable environment such as a building or space satellite. That is a very tight window for safety.

The Volt already balances its cells.

Did you know that if you fully charge a lithium cell in a cold environment, and then the cell warms up it becomes overcharged all by itself?.. that probably is the reason GM does not fully charge the cells, only up to 80% I think. They claim is to prevent overcharge from regen braking but that does not make sense.

One advantage of the LiFe cells is that they are very tolerant of abuses such as overcharging, imbalances and deep discharges.. disadvantage is they have a lower voltage and thus lower energy.

..................................................
#136 carcus1 Says: 
Herm,
How ’bout the Aeroflex 5% to 95% SOC window claim? (my post @ 133). Do you buy that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I do.. perhaps for a battery that is in a thermally stable environment such as a building or space satellite. That is a very tight window for safety.</p>
<p>The Volt already balances its cells.</p>
<p>Did you know that if you fully charge a lithium cell in a cold environment, and then the cell warms up it becomes overcharged all by itself?.. that probably is the reason GM does not fully charge the cells, only up to 80% I think. They claim is to prevent overcharge from regen braking but that does not make sense.</p>
<p>One advantage of the LiFe cells is that they are very tolerant of abuses such as overcharging, imbalances and deep discharges.. disadvantage is they have a lower voltage and thus lower energy.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
#136 carcus1 Says:<br />
Herm,<br />
How ’bout the Aeroflex 5% to 95% SOC window claim? (my post @ 133). Do you buy that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Vehicle Owner</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/05/06/gms-unnamed-2-mode-plug-in-hybrid-to-enter-test-fleets-in-2011/#comment-111919</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Vehicle Owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1652#comment-111919</guid>
		<description>#135

Hey, does gasoline have to meet the 10 year, 100,000 mile useability warranty? If not, cause for a lawsuit, methinks. If so, show me that gas in your gas tank that&#039;s 10 years old and traveled 100,000 miles. Since a power pack doesn&#039;t use it&#039;s full charge, it always retains some of its original energy atoms in 100% usable form, which should validate the warrenty. Someone set me straight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#135</p>
<p>Hey, does gasoline have to meet the 10 year, 100,000 mile useability warranty? If not, cause for a lawsuit, methinks. If so, show me that gas in your gas tank that&#8217;s 10 years old and traveled 100,000 miles. Since a power pack doesn&#8217;t use it&#8217;s full charge, it always retains some of its original energy atoms in 100% usable form, which should validate the warrenty. Someone set me straight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 401/405 objects using apc

Served from: gm-volt.com @ 2012-02-13 09:27:40 -->
