<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama: Chrysler Will File for Bankruptcy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:55:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Dollar</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/#comment-115621</link>
		<dc:creator>San Francisco Dollar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1643#comment-115621</guid>
		<description>A few weeks ago I discovered this blog and have been following along steadily. I decided I would give my opening comment. Im not sure what to write except that I have loved perusing. Nice blog. I will continue coming back to this site in the future.  I have also taken your RSS feed for updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago I discovered this blog and have been following along steadily. I decided I would give my opening comment. Im not sure what to write except that I have loved perusing. Nice blog. I will continue coming back to this site in the future.  I have also taken your RSS feed for updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melee</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/#comment-110782</link>
		<dc:creator>melee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 19:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1643#comment-110782</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that plan&#039;s a sure fire success. Personally I&#039;m thrilled to suffer inflationary pressures and higher taxes to postpone the inevitable.

Good money after bad. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that plan&#8217;s a sure fire success. Personally I&#8217;m thrilled to suffer inflationary pressures and higher taxes to postpone the inevitable.</p>
<p>Good money after bad. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob G</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/#comment-110756</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1643#comment-110756</guid>
		<description>#71 LauraM Says, &quot;Betraying the whole country? Don’t you think that’s a little harsh? If anyone is “betraying the whole country,” it’s the government for not sticking a tariff on imported vehicles.&quot;

I always enjoy your refreshing voice of reason!  I will concede that &quot;betrayal&quot; is too harsh of a term, but I have strong feelings about people who intentionally harm my country.  Furthermore, I couldn&#039;t agree more with you that the U.S. government has failed at resolving trade inequities.  I really hope our new president does exactly as you say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#71 LauraM Says, &#8220;Betraying the whole country? Don’t you think that’s a little harsh? If anyone is “betraying the whole country,” it’s the government for not sticking a tariff on imported vehicles.&#8221;</p>
<p>I always enjoy your refreshing voice of reason!  I will concede that &#8220;betrayal&#8221; is too harsh of a term, but I have strong feelings about people who intentionally harm my country.  Furthermore, I couldn&#8217;t agree more with you that the U.S. government has failed at resolving trade inequities.  I really hope our new president does exactly as you say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob G</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/#comment-110751</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1643#comment-110751</guid>
		<description>#64 GM Outsider Says, &quot;You must be really stupid to claim it is a betray of the USA by buying Toyota Corolla, actually mine was made in Osaka, Japan, it took me 30 min to find a Japanese one from the lot last month! It is better, PERIOD!&quot;

Perhaps you think that calling me &quot;stupid&quot; convinces everyone that you are correct, and saying &quot;PERIOD&quot; means that the debate has ended and you have won.  In reality, if you want to convince people of the validity of your point of view, you need two essential ingredients: facts and people skills.

The facts that I have are that Japan has a history of protectionist trade policies and subsidies to their domestic industries.  This gives their industries a tremendous unfair advantage in the U.S. market.  Their distorted cost structure is what has historically allowed them to provide more quality for a lower price.  But, even at such a disadvantage, U.S. industry has been catching up in recent years.

When you buy Japanese products instead of similar American-made products, American industry suffers.  If we were talking about a nation that trades more fairly (like Canada), they would reciprocate, give our products a fair chance to be sold in their country, and the gains from the exports would balance out the losses from the imports.  But Japan doesn&#039;t reciprocate (otherwise, they wouldn&#039;t have such huge trade surpluses).  This weakens our whole society, because less jobs are available to support our families, and less tax money is available for social programs, infrastructure, and national defense.

That is why I contend that, when reasonable alternatives are available, but you choose to weaken America&#039;s economy just to get a better deal for yourself, you are betraying your country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#64 GM Outsider Says, &#8220;You must be really stupid to claim it is a betray of the USA by buying Toyota Corolla, actually mine was made in Osaka, Japan, it took me 30 min to find a Japanese one from the lot last month! It is better, PERIOD!&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps you think that calling me &#8220;stupid&#8221; convinces everyone that you are correct, and saying &#8220;PERIOD&#8221; means that the debate has ended and you have won.  In reality, if you want to convince people of the validity of your point of view, you need two essential ingredients: facts and people skills.</p>
<p>The facts that I have are that Japan has a history of protectionist trade policies and subsidies to their domestic industries.  This gives their industries a tremendous unfair advantage in the U.S. market.  Their distorted cost structure is what has historically allowed them to provide more quality for a lower price.  But, even at such a disadvantage, U.S. industry has been catching up in recent years.</p>
<p>When you buy Japanese products instead of similar American-made products, American industry suffers.  If we were talking about a nation that trades more fairly (like Canada), they would reciprocate, give our products a fair chance to be sold in their country, and the gains from the exports would balance out the losses from the imports.  But Japan doesn&#8217;t reciprocate (otherwise, they wouldn&#8217;t have such huge trade surpluses).  This weakens our whole society, because less jobs are available to support our families, and less tax money is available for social programs, infrastructure, and national defense.</p>
<p>That is why I contend that, when reasonable alternatives are available, but you choose to weaken America&#8217;s economy just to get a better deal for yourself, you are betraying your country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fas</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/#comment-110722</link>
		<dc:creator>fas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1643#comment-110722</guid>
		<description>Chrysler is after all GMs little brother, hahah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrysler is after all GMs little brother, hahah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N Riley</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/#comment-110656</link>
		<dc:creator>N Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1643#comment-110656</guid>
		<description>I have not read any comments.  But, I do not like the idea of the UAW owning 55% of Chrysler or any other auto company.  Having the union own any part of a company is quite different than employee ownership, which I do not object to.  I have owned several Chrysler autos over my life time.  I will not ever own another as long as the UAW is in ownership.  The same will hold true for GM purchases.  None. None at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not read any comments.  But, I do not like the idea of the UAW owning 55% of Chrysler or any other auto company.  Having the union own any part of a company is quite different than employee ownership, which I do not object to.  I have owned several Chrysler autos over my life time.  I will not ever own another as long as the UAW is in ownership.  The same will hold true for GM purchases.  None. None at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/#comment-110525</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 05:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1643#comment-110525</guid>
		<description>So I guess the UAW head guys will all be on the board of directors. Wonder how that will work. Could actually be a positive because they now have the motivation to make better operational decisions.

Instead of forcing GM to build cars in Detroit they will look at the costs and say, &quot;If we build down south our numbers look better and the stock price will go up&quot;.

Then again, if they don&#039;t have top executives making those decisions they will most likely not make the best decisions.

Now contrast this to Chrysler’s new directors having to compete head-to-head with the Japanese and their cut-throat competitiveness and razor sharp management style. Good luck Chrysler!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I guess the UAW head guys will all be on the board of directors. Wonder how that will work. Could actually be a positive because they now have the motivation to make better operational decisions.</p>
<p>Instead of forcing GM to build cars in Detroit they will look at the costs and say, &#8220;If we build down south our numbers look better and the stock price will go up&#8221;.</p>
<p>Then again, if they don&#8217;t have top executives making those decisions they will most likely not make the best decisions.</p>
<p>Now contrast this to Chrysler’s new directors having to compete head-to-head with the Japanese and their cut-throat competitiveness and razor sharp management style. Good luck Chrysler!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ccombs</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/#comment-110517</link>
		<dc:creator>ccombs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 04:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1643#comment-110517</guid>
		<description>#58, I definitely agree. People are starting to sound all xenophobic like they did in the early 90s when he died and it is a bit scary. It is so bitterly ironic that he wasn&#039;t even Japanese, but rather from a people that have far more reason to hate Japan than even Americans do. Then again, what in the heck have the younger generations ever done to China or the US that warrants such vitriol? Japan has never acted like a saint and certainly doesn&#039;t play fair with trade, but after all of our auto bailouts we can hardly say the US has been hands-off. Maybe I&#039;d be more pissed if I were a laid-off autoworker, but nothing justifies such extreme hatred.

I&#039;m certainly no bleeding-heart liberal, but these patriotism accusations flying around the comments are ridiculous. I think it is stupid that many people blindly buy foreign cars because they have misconceptions about American cars. However, it is even more stupid to accuse people of traitorous behavior for simply buying a Japanese car. Japan, especially since their &quot;lost decade&quot; is not a threat to the US. With China you might have a point, but even then it would be very tenuous. Maybe those people lack sufficient national pride, but traitor is not a word to be used lightly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#58, I definitely agree. People are starting to sound all xenophobic like they did in the early 90s when he died and it is a bit scary. It is so bitterly ironic that he wasn&#8217;t even Japanese, but rather from a people that have far more reason to hate Japan than even Americans do. Then again, what in the heck have the younger generations ever done to China or the US that warrants such vitriol? Japan has never acted like a saint and certainly doesn&#8217;t play fair with trade, but after all of our auto bailouts we can hardly say the US has been hands-off. Maybe I&#8217;d be more pissed if I were a laid-off autoworker, but nothing justifies such extreme hatred.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly no bleeding-heart liberal, but these patriotism accusations flying around the comments are ridiculous. I think it is stupid that many people blindly buy foreign cars because they have misconceptions about American cars. However, it is even more stupid to accuse people of traitorous behavior for simply buying a Japanese car. Japan, especially since their &#8220;lost decade&#8221; is not a threat to the US. With China you might have a point, but even then it would be very tenuous. Maybe those people lack sufficient national pride, but traitor is not a word to be used lightly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDAVIS</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/#comment-110518</link>
		<dc:creator>CDAVIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 04:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1643#comment-110518</guid>
		<description>_______________________________________________________________________
#81 LauraM Said:
#66 vincent
I think it’s a little unrealistic to expect Elon Musk to give GM credit for anything. They’re competitors. I’m sure he’s thrilled anytime the Volt get’s bad PR.
 ---------

I agree Elon can’t be expected to give GM public credit especially considering the Fisker tie to GM. But would Elon be better served by not publicly throwing stones at a car company that the government is a very big stakeholder in? Tesla has applied for a $350M government loan financing facility to help finance the Tesla Model S production. In theory Tesla throwing stones at GM should not influence the government decision to provide Tesla a loan but in practice….well you know how that goes. 

I’m a big Tesla fan (and Volt fan). I give Elon credit for getting behind Tesla and following through with getting the Tesla Roadster into production. There is only a 200 AER mile gap and $10,000 cost premium gap preventing the Tesla Model S from being a near perfect Electric Car for a very wide consumer base. Those gaps disappear over the next five years if Tesla is moderately successful with the Model S. For all that to happen, Tesla needs the cash to build the Model S.

Putting aside the question if the government should be in the business of providing car companies loans, I can think of no automaker more technically qualified than Tesla to receive an EV government loan grant. Tesla getting or not getting the ~$350M government grant loan will be a test of how even handed the Obama administration is towards aiding  EV development.
_______________________________________________________________________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_______________________________________________________________________<br />
#81 LauraM Said:<br />
#66 vincent<br />
I think it’s a little unrealistic to expect Elon Musk to give GM credit for anything. They’re competitors. I’m sure he’s thrilled anytime the Volt get’s bad PR.<br />
 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>I agree Elon can’t be expected to give GM public credit especially considering the Fisker tie to GM. But would Elon be better served by not publicly throwing stones at a car company that the government is a very big stakeholder in? Tesla has applied for a $350M government loan financing facility to help finance the Tesla Model S production. In theory Tesla throwing stones at GM should not influence the government decision to provide Tesla a loan but in practice….well you know how that goes. </p>
<p>I’m a big Tesla fan (and Volt fan). I give Elon credit for getting behind Tesla and following through with getting the Tesla Roadster into production. There is only a 200 AER mile gap and $10,000 cost premium gap preventing the Tesla Model S from being a near perfect Electric Car for a very wide consumer base. Those gaps disappear over the next five years if Tesla is moderately successful with the Model S. For all that to happen, Tesla needs the cash to build the Model S.</p>
<p>Putting aside the question if the government should be in the business of providing car companies loans, I can think of no automaker more technically qualified than Tesla to receive an EV government loan grant. Tesla getting or not getting the ~$350M government grant loan will be a test of how even handed the Obama administration is towards aiding  EV development.<br />
_______________________________________________________________________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/04/30/obama-chrysler-will-file-for-bankruptcy/#comment-110504</link>
		<dc:creator>David G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1643#comment-110504</guid>
		<description>#76 truthguy 

Is every product you buy American?  Take a look around your house, I&#039;m guessing the answer is no.  I&#039;m a big consumer.  I buy a lot of consumer products and some American some not.  Cars are just not something I happen to buy American.

But you&#039;ll be happy to know for the first time in my life I am considering buying an American car.  A Tesla.   Not because I feel obligated, but because someone finally made a car I really want to buy that happens to be made here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#76 truthguy </p>
<p>Is every product you buy American?  Take a look around your house, I&#8217;m guessing the answer is no.  I&#8217;m a big consumer.  I buy a lot of consumer products and some American some not.  Cars are just not something I happen to buy American.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;ll be happy to know for the first time in my life I am considering buying an American car.  A Tesla.   Not because I feel obligated, but because someone finally made a car I really want to buy that happens to be made here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.388 seconds -->
