<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kill the Bad GM to Save Good the GM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:55:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Harwick</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/#comment-104636</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Harwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1586#comment-104636</guid>
		<description>Since the Obama administration was bought and paid for by organized labor in the 2008 election, you can be certain that the &quot;good&quot; GM will include 99% of the existing gold-pated UAW contract, retaining  the highest automotive hourly wages in the world, and retiree health care far in excess of Medicare benefits.

GM will continue to lose money on every car they sell.  They will make up the red ink with bailout funds received during the bankruptcy.  When those are exhausted,. Barak &quot;Santa Claus&quot; Obama will simply restart the flow of taxpayer funds into the &quot;good&quot; GM.

Or maybe I am wrong.  Maybe the Democrats will not give the UAW everything they ask for.  Yeah, sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the Obama administration was bought and paid for by organized labor in the 2008 election, you can be certain that the &#8220;good&#8221; GM will include 99% of the existing gold-pated UAW contract, retaining  the highest automotive hourly wages in the world, and retiree health care far in excess of Medicare benefits.</p>
<p>GM will continue to lose money on every car they sell.  They will make up the red ink with bailout funds received during the bankruptcy.  When those are exhausted,. Barak &#8220;Santa Claus&#8221; Obama will simply restart the flow of taxpayer funds into the &#8220;good&#8221; GM.</p>
<p>Or maybe I am wrong.  Maybe the Democrats will not give the UAW everything they ask for.  Yeah, sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robb</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/#comment-104122</link>
		<dc:creator>robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1586#comment-104122</guid>
		<description>I currently work for the IAM. I did not vote the union in. I beleive that unions have been and always be organized thuggery. I should be making 25 hr based on the WDB for this area. I currently make 32hr thanks to the union. When an outside organization(unions)can manipulate what the people under it&#039;s control(workers for companies) are compensated they will always try to squeeze more out of companies; Unions get a percentage(dues) based on wages of people in there contract under a company. Unions serve no one but themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently work for the IAM. I did not vote the union in. I beleive that unions have been and always be organized thuggery. I should be making 25 hr based on the WDB for this area. I currently make 32hr thanks to the union. When an outside organization(unions)can manipulate what the people under it&#8217;s control(workers for companies) are compensated they will always try to squeeze more out of companies; Unions get a percentage(dues) based on wages of people in there contract under a company. Unions serve no one but themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: statik</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/#comment-103924</link>
		<dc:creator>statik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1586#comment-103924</guid>
		<description>#125 Tom said:

About ten years ago I put a big part of my 401k into GM bonds that mature in 2012. It was a great idea at the time. Now I’ve watched my retirement dwindle. To those who talk about bondholders like big financial types who are just being greedy I thought this point might be of interest. A lot of GM bond holders are just like me — ordinary working folks hoping to be able to retire before they’re 90 years old.
============================
I feel bad for you Tom.  But investing in a corporate bond is assuming a risk to receive a greater return over a secured investment.  Putting a good chunk into anyone one high yielding bond is a little greedy...regular joe or a &#039;financial type&#039;

Also, investing a big part of your 401k in any one unsecured vehicle is a really bad idea.  Diversification is the game here...even at the most aggressive, I would suggest something like 20% in high yield cash account, 30% corporate bonds and munis, 50% mix in ETFs/diversified equity.  

Hopefully you are not too close to retirement and you can make up the difference by putting away a little extra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#125 Tom said:</p>
<p>About ten years ago I put a big part of my 401k into GM bonds that mature in 2012. It was a great idea at the time. Now I’ve watched my retirement dwindle. To those who talk about bondholders like big financial types who are just being greedy I thought this point might be of interest. A lot of GM bond holders are just like me — ordinary working folks hoping to be able to retire before they’re 90 years old.<br />
============================<br />
I feel bad for you Tom.  But investing in a corporate bond is assuming a risk to receive a greater return over a secured investment.  Putting a good chunk into anyone one high yielding bond is a little greedy&#8230;regular joe or a &#8216;financial type&#8217;</p>
<p>Also, investing a big part of your 401k in any one unsecured vehicle is a really bad idea.  Diversification is the game here&#8230;even at the most aggressive, I would suggest something like 20% in high yield cash account, 30% corporate bonds and munis, 50% mix in ETFs/diversified equity.  </p>
<p>Hopefully you are not too close to retirement and you can make up the difference by putting away a little extra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Detfan</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/#comment-103734</link>
		<dc:creator>Detfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1586#comment-103734</guid>
		<description>To the earlier posts regarding Obama, I have been recording his lies from campaign to President, and he is up to 23 as of yesterday.  History will regard President Bush much kinder than todays short sighted citizens.

I really, really hope he doesn&#039;t screw up the auto industry, too!!  Already, my newborn grandchild owes more on the federal debt, than it costs to buy the award winning Chevy Malibu.  God help us!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the earlier posts regarding Obama, I have been recording his lies from campaign to President, and he is up to 23 as of yesterday.  History will regard President Bush much kinder than todays short sighted citizens.</p>
<p>I really, really hope he doesn&#8217;t screw up the auto industry, too!!  Already, my newborn grandchild owes more on the federal debt, than it costs to buy the award winning Chevy Malibu.  God help us!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: statik</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/#comment-103730</link>
		<dc:creator>statik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1586#comment-103730</guid>
		<description>#128 john1701a said:

It wasn’t me, it Toyota corporate. They forced dealers to sell only at MSRP. Remember the online order process? That was the only way to get a new Prius from Aug 2000 to May 2002.
==============================
Now you mention it...I vaguely remember something like that.  Thanks for pointing that out.  

/might be a good model for GM to follow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#128 john1701a said:</p>
<p>It wasn’t me, it Toyota corporate. They forced dealers to sell only at MSRP. Remember the online order process? That was the only way to get a new Prius from Aug 2000 to May 2002.<br />
==============================<br />
Now you mention it&#8230;I vaguely remember something like that.  Thanks for pointing that out.  </p>
<p>/might be a good model for GM to follow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john1701a</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/#comment-103716</link>
		<dc:creator>john1701a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1586#comment-103716</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Good price, I like guys who can beat down the base MSRP out of guys with no dealer premium on a brand new model…&lt;/i&gt;
______________________________

It wasn&#039;t me, it Toyota corporate.  They forced dealers to sell only at MSRP.  Remember the online order process?  That was the only way to get a new Prius from Aug 2000 to May 2002.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Good price, I like guys who can beat down the base MSRP out of guys with no dealer premium on a brand new model…</i><br />
______________________________</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t me, it Toyota corporate.  They forced dealers to sell only at MSRP.  Remember the online order process?  That was the only way to get a new Prius from Aug 2000 to May 2002.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: statik</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/#comment-103715</link>
		<dc:creator>statik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1586#comment-103715</guid>
		<description>#112 Jim I said:

I am kind of curious about something:

How many of you actually pay cash for your cars?

Personally, the only car I ever paid cash for was my first vehicle, a new 1971 Ford Mustang coupe. It was a base price model and cost me about $3K, which was just about my entire life savings. But at 18 years old, I thought it was worth every penny! Every car purchsed since then has been financed, but for no more than 48 months.
----------------
I have bought all my cars cash for the last 15 years...except for when the finance rate was lower than what I could make in guaranteed interest on the open market (just makes sense)

/last financed car at a unfavorable rate was a 93 Grand Am
==================
==================

#118 john1701a said

My window-sticker from that time clearly says $19,995.

Floormats added $70, plus there was $455 of delivery, processing, and handling fees bringing the grand total to $20,520.
--------------------
Good price, I like guys who can beat down the base MSRP out of guys with no dealer premium on a brand new model...I was just stabbing at the aprox average price you could widdle out of them.

You could still make the same $10,000 difference argument if you went with the absolute lowest MSRP price out the door of both products.  The Cavalier routinely had discount rebates/sales off the MSRP and 0% financing that Toyota never even considered doing on any vehicle (let alone the Prius)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#112 Jim I said:</p>
<p>I am kind of curious about something:</p>
<p>How many of you actually pay cash for your cars?</p>
<p>Personally, the only car I ever paid cash for was my first vehicle, a new 1971 Ford Mustang coupe. It was a base price model and cost me about $3K, which was just about my entire life savings. But at 18 years old, I thought it was worth every penny! Every car purchsed since then has been financed, but for no more than 48 months.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
I have bought all my cars cash for the last 15 years&#8230;except for when the finance rate was lower than what I could make in guaranteed interest on the open market (just makes sense)</p>
<p>/last financed car at a unfavorable rate was a 93 Grand Am<br />
==================<br />
==================</p>
<p>#118 john1701a said</p>
<p>My window-sticker from that time clearly says $19,995.</p>
<p>Floormats added $70, plus there was $455 of delivery, processing, and handling fees bringing the grand total to $20,520.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Good price, I like guys who can beat down the base MSRP out of guys with no dealer premium on a brand new model&#8230;I was just stabbing at the aprox average price you could widdle out of them.</p>
<p>You could still make the same $10,000 difference argument if you went with the absolute lowest MSRP price out the door of both products.  The Cavalier routinely had discount rebates/sales off the MSRP and 0% financing that Toyota never even considered doing on any vehicle (let alone the Prius)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: statik</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/#comment-103709</link>
		<dc:creator>statik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1586#comment-103709</guid>
		<description>#110 DonC

#108 statik

This was a nice catch. Someone is barring their teeth, eh? If the report is true then the message to the bondholders is clear: take this or you’ll get less in bankruptcy. 

And the bondholders are saying: fine, but we can force you to take GM into bankruptcy, which we know you don’t want to do, so sweeten the offer.

Like I said, the game is “Chicken”.
======================
The game is certainly heating up, should be interesting to just see how the announcement goes on monday, who gives it, what is in it...and most importantly the tone in which it is delivered.

/maybe we will finally get some tough talk  (who knows)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#110 DonC</p>
<p>#108 statik</p>
<p>This was a nice catch. Someone is barring their teeth, eh? If the report is true then the message to the bondholders is clear: take this or you’ll get less in bankruptcy. </p>
<p>And the bondholders are saying: fine, but we can force you to take GM into bankruptcy, which we know you don’t want to do, so sweeten the offer.</p>
<p>Like I said, the game is “Chicken”.<br />
======================<br />
The game is certainly heating up, should be interesting to just see how the announcement goes on monday, who gives it, what is in it&#8230;and most importantly the tone in which it is delivered.</p>
<p>/maybe we will finally get some tough talk  (who knows)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/#comment-103696</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1586#comment-103696</guid>
		<description>About ten years ago I put a big part of my 401k into GM bonds that mature in 2012.  It was a great idea at the time.  Now I&#039;ve watched my retirement dwindle.  To those who talk about bondholders like big financial types who are just being greedy I thought this point might be of interest.  A lot of GM bond holders are just like me -- ordinary working folks hoping to be able to retire before they&#039;re 90 years old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About ten years ago I put a big part of my 401k into GM bonds that mature in 2012.  It was a great idea at the time.  Now I&#8217;ve watched my retirement dwindle.  To those who talk about bondholders like big financial types who are just being greedy I thought this point might be of interest.  A lot of GM bond holders are just like me &#8212; ordinary working folks hoping to be able to retire before they&#8217;re 90 years old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDAVIS</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/03/28/kill-the-bad-gm-to-save-good-the-gm/#comment-103690</link>
		<dc:creator>CDAVIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1586#comment-103690</guid>
		<description>______________________________________________________
#122 Dan Petit Says:

“The reason why 95% of them are there to be sold to you is that there are some extremely-nasty technical problems that are very expensive to repair.”

 ------
That statistic is simply not correct. A more correct statistic would be the inverse: 5%.

Most pre-owned cars are from off-lease programs or consumers that are trading up after a few years of use. Many of the pre-owned cars sold today are covered by a manufacturer’s certified extended warranty programs or a dealer’s extended warranty program. Consumer’s reserve the right to have a professional mechanic inspect a pre-owned car prior to final purchase.

Purchasing a pre-owned car remains a good consumer option if approached reasonably intelligently
______________________________________________________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>______________________________________________________<br />
#122 Dan Petit Says:</p>
<p>“The reason why 95% of them are there to be sold to you is that there are some extremely-nasty technical problems that are very expensive to repair.”</p>
<p> &#8212;&#8212;<br />
That statistic is simply not correct. A more correct statistic would be the inverse: 5%.</p>
<p>Most pre-owned cars are from off-lease programs or consumers that are trading up after a few years of use. Many of the pre-owned cars sold today are covered by a manufacturer’s certified extended warranty programs or a dealer’s extended warranty program. Consumer’s reserve the right to have a professional mechanic inspect a pre-owned car prior to final purchase.</p>
<p>Purchasing a pre-owned car remains a good consumer option if approached reasonably intelligently<br />
______________________________________________________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.386 seconds -->
