Archive for January, 2009

 

Jan 26

GMs’ European Volt Electric Sister to be Unveiled in March: Introducing the Opel Ampera

 

It has been known for some time that that Chevy Volt is a global vehicle intended to be sold and driven in many of the countries GM does business.  Europe is clearly a key market intended for this car.  We have also heard that the Volt will first appear there under the Opel brand, which is known for advanced technology.

The automaker has just announced that it will reveal what appears to be the European version of the Chevy Volt at the Geneva Auto Show on March 3rd.

They have given the five-door four-seater car its own name, the Opel Ampera.  As well a teaser photo has been released. There are no technical specs at this point, however the photo shows the body is unmistakably that of the Chevy Volt although with signature Opel branding features. It is unknown whether this vehicle will use a diesel or gasoline range extender, but the first 60 km of driving will indeed be on pure electricity.

Per said Alain Visser, GM Europe Chief Marketing Officer, “With the Ampera, Opel will be the first European automobile manufacturer to provide customers several hundred kilometers of non-stop electric driving,”

It was also noted that “additional information on the Opel Ampera will be released March 3 at the Geneva Motor Show.”

UPDATE: GM Voltec spokesperson David Darovitz has confirmed to GM-Volt.com that the car is indeed the European version of the Chevy Volt.

The vehicle will also be produced as the Vauxhall Ampera.


Source (GM)

 

Jan 26

GM’s Advanced Battery Director on Why LG Chem Beat A123 for the Chevy Volt Contract

 

Those of us who follow the Volt story closely have known for a long time that LG Chem and A123 were in competition to get the Chevy Volt battery contract. Earlier this month, GM announced it had chosen LG Chem. I had the chance to ask Denise Gray, who is GM’S Direct of Advanced Batteries how and why the decision was made.

So why did you choose LG Chem over A123?

There was a number of reasons that went into the decision-making process, not one single element.
From a longevity of being in the battery business, design readiness, and a design that integrated into our battery pack design. There’s a lot of work to make sure that the size of the cells are appropriate for structural integrity or the cooling system that we designed to go into that, and for the electronic system, all the monitoring, for the high voltage carrying capacity, just for the overall height of the cells to fit into the vehicles so that all of our rear-impact and side impact tests are passed.

So you’re saying it was more the integration of the cells into the pack design that played a role than the actual chemistry?
All of the above, the chemistry and the capability, LG’s manufacturability, and the work that they’ve done and the lines that are in place today from a prototype perspective. The integration of the size of that cell equivalent to our overall scheme.

The different chemistries have different thermal characteristics and so we’ve been able to incorporate how to make sure from a thermal perspective that we’ve got it, from a functional perspective, not a safety perspective.

So it was all of those. Experience, manufacturing, and performance.

Did they win by a landslide or was it a close race?
I’d say it was a close race.

I heard you guys were from early on only using LG packs in the mules?
Both packs were in our laboratory undergoing tests. Both from the mounting capability, the shape of them all looked the same so we could put in one or the other (in the mules). LG had the lion’s share of our mule testing, because they had them available earlier.

So they were able to get you more packs sooner?
That’s right. It really wasn’t because one was better than the other at that time, it was all those things I mentioned coming together as well as the availability of the packs.

 

Jan 25

How GM Decided on the Term E-REV to Describe the Volt

 

Last week we held a poll here indicating support of readers to using the term E-REV for extended-range electric vehicle to describe the Chevy Volt, versus REEV as some automakers are using.

The poll (summarized above) showed that of 986 respondants, 70% preferred E-REV versus 10% preferring REEV.  15% felt the term didn’t matter, and 5% had some other idea.

I pointed these findings out to Tony Posawatz who is GM’s Volt vehicle line director who explains to us in some detail how GM came to use this term.  Tony is also co-chairman of the Electric Drive Transportation Association (EDTA) that represents many OEMs engaging in public policy and engineering standards that will help guide and build our electric car future.

Here’s how Tony explained it:

Some background on our use of Extended-Range EV vs. other options (specifically, REEV).

When we initially looked at REEV, we uncovered that there would be confusion around what exactly does it stand for.

Is it “range extender EV,” or “range extending EV,” or “range extended EV?” This made RE-EV difficult to make common.

We focused on the E-REV for the following reasons:
1. extended-range EV was the same convention as battery EV, fuel cell EV, etc.
2. a few gov’t agencies are more comfortable with this term and are using it to uniquely define the VOLT propulsion system. As such, we will help define the standards for this propulsion system.
3. continued to keep this propulsion system distinct and different from hybrid technology.
4. it sounded cooler.

The more we communicate the benefits inherent in an extended-range EV, the more customers view the term and the technology as very positive.

 

Jan 24

New 2011 Chevy Volt Picture Gallery

 

GM has decided to afford us with a new set of visually interesting Chevy Volt pictures. You can click them to bring you to the galleries from where you can get to wallpaper size if your click the “View this photo on Flickr” link.  Enjoy.

2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car X11CH_VT046 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car 2011 Chevrolet Volt Production Show Car

 

Jan 23

GM Q&A With Bob Kruse on the Chevy Volt’s Batteries

 

Bob Kruse is GM’s executive director of global vehicle engineering for hybrids, electric vehicles, and batteries. There is a report of a new interview with him. Bob is an executive integrally involved in producing the Volt and other future electric cars.

He discussed the current status of lithium-ion battery technology. He described the process of evaluating cells for the Volt ant noted “We selected LG as the cell source for Gen-one Volt; and we are also very intrigued and attracted to some of what A123 has to offer and are continuing to do advanced development with A123 for future applications – just not Gen-one Volt.”

He talked about GM’s recent battery pack announcement saying “We decided this battery pack business was really core to being in the electric vehicle market. So part of our [January 12] announcement was that, in addition to announcing LG as the cell source, that GM is also moving to design internally, and engineer internally, and validate internally, and ultimately manufacture internally the battery packs.”

He admitted the packs are expensive but wouldn’t say how much or whether they are more than $10,000. He explained how GM is working hard to push future battery costs down noting “in addition to the Gen-one battery system, I’m right now also working on Gen-two and Gen-three solutions that have elements of both performance and cost that are part of my expectations of my team to deliver future-gen systems.”

Kruse responded to a question about thermal runaway/safety concerns of lithium-ion cells. He said “There are many layers of safety built into the Volt,” including “all the way down to the cell level.” He noted the importance of the prismatic cell shape and the use of LG Chem’s proprietary anode/cathode separator in that regard. He said GM employed stringent safety testing standards and confirms “I can assure you we’ve met those standards with what we’ve designed and what we’ve selected.”

He admitted it woudl be important to have a US-based cell supplier, saying ” If and when there is a lithium-ion cell manufacturing footprint in the US, they will come onto our radar and get appropriate consideration.” But he acknowledges that foreign sources such as LG Chem were the only ones up to speed at this point.

He explained GM’s strategy to ensure the batteries will last 10 years or 100,000 miles citing proprietary GM intellectual property around battery management describing the process as “I have more battery capacity than I’m using. There’s a sweet spot in there. I won’t over charge the battery, or over discharge the battery.”

He discussed risks of battery failure, noting how critical it is to have “pharmaceutical” grade battery purity. He explained that if even one cell falters it could strain the other cells in the pack, potentially degrading them. The solution to prevent this he explained as “part of what I have designed into the pack is a very sophisticated cell balancing capability, so that as the pack ages, the individual cells age. I will adapt the cells to the pack, constantly rebalancing my pack…. The software and hardware, the algorithm that does that, and how we do that, is also highly prized intellectual property.

Source (Christan Science Monitor)

 

Jan 22

On The 2010 Prius Solar Roof

 

To this day people new to the Volt concept continue to draw the conclusion that it should have solar cells on its roof.

Here’s an email I just got today:

THE NEW CAR THE VOLT.WHY DIDN’T YOU PUT SOLAR PANELS ON THE ROOF. IT WOULD CHARGE THE BATTERY WHEN IT SAT OUT SIDE IN THE SUN??????????

The idea that a small panel of solar cells sitting on the roof in sunlight even for hours could do much to actually recharge the battery and justify its expense are unfortunately unrealistic at the present time.

However, the public “green-demand” for it has led GM vice chairman Bob Lutz to infer that a solar roof could be a Volt option. It was supposed to be shown at the Detroit Auto Show, but never made an appearance.

Toyota though, rode the PR wave and introduced a solar roof option for its new 2010 Prius, which is base-priced at $22,000, gets combined 50 mpg fuel efficiency, and went on sale in May.

Here’s how Toyota describes their solar panel option which retails for $3500:

An available sliding glass moonroof is packaged with solar panels, located over the rear seating area, that power a new ventilation system. This solar powered ventilation system uses an electrically powered air circulation fan that does not require engine assist. The system prevents the interior air temperature from rising while the vehicle is parked, making the cool-down time shorter when the driver returns to the vehicle, thus reducing the use of air conditioning.

Check out the following video and see how that Prius solar panel roof actually works out in real word testing: