<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: POLL:  E-REV or RE-EV?  Time For a Decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/18/e-rev-or-re-ev-time-for-a-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/18/e-rev-or-re-ev-time-for-a-decision/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:26:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Devine</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/18/e-rev-or-re-ev-time-for-a-decision/#comment-92036</link>
		<dc:creator>William Devine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1480#comment-92036</guid>
		<description>This is a &#039;Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle&quot;.  It&#039;s a series hybrid gas-electric vehicle that can be plugged in.  That term already exists and works well to describe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a &#8216;Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle&#8221;.  It&#8217;s a series hybrid gas-electric vehicle that can be plugged in.  That term already exists and works well to describe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Simpson</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/18/e-rev-or-re-ev-time-for-a-decision/#comment-91364</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1480#comment-91364</guid>
		<description>They should be called what they are: Series hybrids.  Other than that, let them all use their own trademarked name so they can claim no one else can offer what they offer.  Just like Techroline in gasoline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should be called what they are: Series hybrids.  Other than that, let them all use their own trademarked name so they can claim no one else can offer what they offer.  Just like Techroline in gasoline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohsen</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/18/e-rev-or-re-ev-time-for-a-decision/#comment-91360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1480#comment-91360</guid>
		<description>Obviously the best abbreviation is 

&quot;XEV&quot;

eXtended-range EV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously the best abbreviation is </p>
<p>&#8220;XEV&#8221;</p>
<p>eXtended-range EV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Borgman</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/18/e-rev-or-re-ev-time-for-a-decision/#comment-91358</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Borgman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1480#comment-91358</guid>
		<description>you give us the choice of letters that spell &quot;ever&quot;. So it is only logical to call the car &quot;Electric vehicle, extended range&quot;. Through usage the cars would be shortened to the EVER cars.
Norm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you give us the choice of letters that spell &#8220;ever&#8221;. So it is only logical to call the car &#8220;Electric vehicle, extended range&#8221;. Through usage the cars would be shortened to the EVER cars.<br />
Norm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Z</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/18/e-rev-or-re-ev-time-for-a-decision/#comment-91356</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1480#comment-91356</guid>
		<description>E-REV would be my choice, however the comments on three letter acronyms make sense due to their simplicity.

EV-1 says &quot;first car,&quot; but EV-2 wouldn&#039;t be evolutionary.

EVE or EV-E sounds like it came from the movie WALL-E, but hints at: Electric Vehicle - extended, evolutionary, enhanced, endless, eternal, environmental, extra, engine, eager, easy, economical, ecological, efficient, effortless, and elegant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-REV would be my choice, however the comments on three letter acronyms make sense due to their simplicity.</p>
<p>EV-1 says &#8220;first car,&#8221; but EV-2 wouldn&#8217;t be evolutionary.</p>
<p>EVE or EV-E sounds like it came from the movie WALL-E, but hints at: Electric Vehicle &#8211; extended, evolutionary, enhanced, endless, eternal, environmental, extra, engine, eager, easy, economical, ecological, efficient, effortless, and elegant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
