<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EEStor Gets a Trademark Patent on EESU and Provides Specs for a 24V EESU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:53:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joemama</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/#comment-117853</link>
		<dc:creator>joemama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1451#comment-117853</guid>
		<description>Breaking News :
The Fantastic Cheese Co.  gets a trademark patent on it&#039;s Fantastic Cheese, and provides specs for 24 kinds of Fantastic Cheese.   It&#039;s a good thing too, because people all over the world love cheese. Therefore Fantastic Cheese needs to be protected and kept secret.
More cheezy reports to follow in the future.  Guarateed !    

There is reportedly great intrest in Fantstic Cheese, so much so, that rumors are starting that some have even smelt Fantastic Cheese in the air while flying over Texas !    It is reported to be quite intoxicating, though there are unconfirmed reports stating that may have been the &#039;smellers&#039; themselves.  

Negotiations are under way between Fantastic Cheese and the cheeseheads of Wisconsin.   Apparently, the cheezy hats that cheeseheads wear to Packer football games are somehow related to Fantastic Cheese.    Though these hats are mostly foam, and not really cheese, executives at Fantastic Cheese are still concerned.  No one really knows the connection.  

Recent reports indicate that Fantastic Cheese has decided not to apply for funding from the governments economic stimulus plan.  Although there is money readily available for new kinds of cheese, executives at Fantastic Cheese have stated that they will not apply for funding because they could no longer remain secretive, and sneaky.  

Plans are under way for Fantatic Cheese to build really fantastic manufacturing facilities, even almost as fantastic as Fantastic Cheese itself.   Reports indicate that they really do have fantastic plans, and fantastic investors are lining up right now, for this fantastic opportunity.   Fantastic Cheese is sure to be a game changer in the cheese world, and rumor has it that many can&#039;t wait to taste it.  Sadly, no one has ever tasted it.   But that will soon change according to fantastic reports from Fantastic Cheese.  All it seems they need is a little more time, and a few more investment dollars, and soon someone will be finally able to taste Fantastic Cheese !    How great that day will be !

Pizzu Huut  has been in contact with Fantatic Cheese, and has negotiated an agreement that gives them the opportunity to hopefully someday, maybe never, but never-the-less maybe, be able to use Fantastic Cheese in the case of a national cheese emergency.   Though company officials at Pizzu Huut have never smelt Fantastic Cheese, nor even tasted it, but they are certain they want to someday, and thus the contract.

Many expert cheese makers have stated that it is impossible to make Fantastic Cheese.  Simply put, they claim the highly complex mathematical computations necessary to make Fantastic Cheese are just not possible.  They also claim the worlds best calculators, and computers are just not capable of those calculations, and thus Fantatic Cheese doesn&#039;t really have anything.  Officials at Fantastic Cheese have been very upset, and are really stirring their curds.  There have been some reports of engineers spilling whey on each other too.   The pressure is on at Fantastic Cheese, but so far all they have delivered is a little yeast.  Before long the whole Fantastic Cheese story may be a little moldy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breaking News :<br />
The Fantastic Cheese Co.  gets a trademark patent on it&#8217;s Fantastic Cheese, and provides specs for 24 kinds of Fantastic Cheese.   It&#8217;s a good thing too, because people all over the world love cheese. Therefore Fantastic Cheese needs to be protected and kept secret.<br />
More cheezy reports to follow in the future.  Guarateed !    </p>
<p>There is reportedly great intrest in Fantstic Cheese, so much so, that rumors are starting that some have even smelt Fantastic Cheese in the air while flying over Texas !    It is reported to be quite intoxicating, though there are unconfirmed reports stating that may have been the &#8217;smellers&#8217; themselves.  </p>
<p>Negotiations are under way between Fantastic Cheese and the cheeseheads of Wisconsin.   Apparently, the cheezy hats that cheeseheads wear to Packer football games are somehow related to Fantastic Cheese.    Though these hats are mostly foam, and not really cheese, executives at Fantastic Cheese are still concerned.  No one really knows the connection.  </p>
<p>Recent reports indicate that Fantastic Cheese has decided not to apply for funding from the governments economic stimulus plan.  Although there is money readily available for new kinds of cheese, executives at Fantastic Cheese have stated that they will not apply for funding because they could no longer remain secretive, and sneaky.  </p>
<p>Plans are under way for Fantatic Cheese to build really fantastic manufacturing facilities, even almost as fantastic as Fantastic Cheese itself.   Reports indicate that they really do have fantastic plans, and fantastic investors are lining up right now, for this fantastic opportunity.   Fantastic Cheese is sure to be a game changer in the cheese world, and rumor has it that many can&#8217;t wait to taste it.  Sadly, no one has ever tasted it.   But that will soon change according to fantastic reports from Fantastic Cheese.  All it seems they need is a little more time, and a few more investment dollars, and soon someone will be finally able to taste Fantastic Cheese !    How great that day will be !</p>
<p>Pizzu Huut  has been in contact with Fantatic Cheese, and has negotiated an agreement that gives them the opportunity to hopefully someday, maybe never, but never-the-less maybe, be able to use Fantastic Cheese in the case of a national cheese emergency.   Though company officials at Pizzu Huut have never smelt Fantastic Cheese, nor even tasted it, but they are certain they want to someday, and thus the contract.</p>
<p>Many expert cheese makers have stated that it is impossible to make Fantastic Cheese.  Simply put, they claim the highly complex mathematical computations necessary to make Fantastic Cheese are just not possible.  They also claim the worlds best calculators, and computers are just not capable of those calculations, and thus Fantatic Cheese doesn&#8217;t really have anything.  Officials at Fantastic Cheese have been very upset, and are really stirring their curds.  There have been some reports of engineers spilling whey on each other too.   The pressure is on at Fantastic Cheese, but so far all they have delivered is a little yeast.  Before long the whole Fantastic Cheese story may be a little moldy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gentle Miant</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/#comment-117542</link>
		<dc:creator>Gentle Miant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1451#comment-117542</guid>
		<description>I wish to comment on some of the posts here rather than the main subject:

The subject of this thread involves world-changing technology and surely we have a right to discuss it even while we haven&#039;t sufficient info to be certain that it&#039;s real.  That a respected company or companies have shown interest does not necessarily prove that it will be possible to develop a practical technology.  Nor does the publication of the spec.s for one particular configuration  invalidate the possibility of use of the technology in a different application with a different configuration.  And it is natural for there to be a lot of emotion involved.

It is natural for those with some degree of technical knowledge to wish to &quot;show it off&quot;.  Unfortunately it is also fairly common for such persons to over-reach their knowledge in order to &quot;be right&quot; or have the &quot;final answer&quot;.

Certainly such over-reaches can sometimes be correct.  That doesn&#039;t alter the fact that, until proven by some means, they were just so much hot air.  No matter how arduous and clever any ridicule, if it is based on insufficient information, it adds nothing to our knowledge of the subject at hand.  And accusations (rather than simply stating a possibility) of scamming or other unethical practice without proof amounts to bearing false witness.

Such an emotion packed subject as this certainly makes one eager to &quot;know&quot; one way or the other, but objectivity requires facing uncertainty sometimes.  Tech creators/developers do not have to prove their devices to the masses during development, and so do not have to spend their time convincing members of this blog for instance, of their veracity.

In sum, I would say that it&#039;s not important WHO is right, but only WHAT is right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish to comment on some of the posts here rather than the main subject:</p>
<p>The subject of this thread involves world-changing technology and surely we have a right to discuss it even while we haven&#8217;t sufficient info to be certain that it&#8217;s real.  That a respected company or companies have shown interest does not necessarily prove that it will be possible to develop a practical technology.  Nor does the publication of the spec.s for one particular configuration  invalidate the possibility of use of the technology in a different application with a different configuration.  And it is natural for there to be a lot of emotion involved.</p>
<p>It is natural for those with some degree of technical knowledge to wish to &#8220;show it off&#8221;.  Unfortunately it is also fairly common for such persons to over-reach their knowledge in order to &#8220;be right&#8221; or have the &#8220;final answer&#8221;.</p>
<p>Certainly such over-reaches can sometimes be correct.  That doesn&#8217;t alter the fact that, until proven by some means, they were just so much hot air.  No matter how arduous and clever any ridicule, if it is based on insufficient information, it adds nothing to our knowledge of the subject at hand.  And accusations (rather than simply stating a possibility) of scamming or other unethical practice without proof amounts to bearing false witness.</p>
<p>Such an emotion packed subject as this certainly makes one eager to &#8220;know&#8221; one way or the other, but objectivity requires facing uncertainty sometimes.  Tech creators/developers do not have to prove their devices to the masses during development, and so do not have to spend their time convincing members of this blog for instance, of their veracity.</p>
<p>In sum, I would say that it&#8217;s not important WHO is right, but only WHAT is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BertKu</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/#comment-113828</link>
		<dc:creator>BertKu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1451#comment-113828</guid>
		<description>Lucky I am one of those idiots who do believe that this capacitor will one day be manufacturered. Siemens made 9 years ago a similar product, but the automotive industry squashed this product and production line. Siemens Regensburg sold the plant. Forced by the trillion dollar industry. It may happen again. If a person can make a very thin conductive layer on an etched very large surface and is able to keep the weight down, the automotive industry is forced to switch over to electric propulsion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky I am one of those idiots who do believe that this capacitor will one day be manufacturered. Siemens made 9 years ago a similar product, but the automotive industry squashed this product and production line. Siemens Regensburg sold the plant. Forced by the trillion dollar industry. It may happen again. If a person can make a very thin conductive layer on an etched very large surface and is able to keep the weight down, the automotive industry is forced to switch over to electric propulsion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carrottop</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/#comment-101387</link>
		<dc:creator>carrottop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1451#comment-101387</guid>
		<description>Idiots - all of you that believe this crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiots &#8211; all of you that believe this crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyRay</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/#comment-101383</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyRay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1451#comment-101383</guid>
		<description>All are Idiots that don&#039;t think Lockheed Martin would make stupid move like this. I saw it happen firsthand (also in the name of homeland security) at NexGenCity. They are now defunct because their only product didn&#039;t work after $13 million taxpayers dollars were spend. 

See for yourself: http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/75478/lockheed_martin_space_operations_successfully_deploys_nexgen_citys_public_safety/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All are Idiots that don&#8217;t think Lockheed Martin would make stupid move like this. I saw it happen firsthand (also in the name of homeland security) at NexGenCity. They are now defunct because their only product didn&#8217;t work after $13 million taxpayers dollars were spend. </p>
<p>See for yourself: <a href="http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/75478/lockheed_martin_space_operations_successfully_deploys_nexgen_citys_public_safety/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/75478/lockheed_martin_space_operations_successfully_deploys_nexgen_citys_public_safety/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackM</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/#comment-99090</link>
		<dc:creator>JackM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 23:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1451#comment-99090</guid>
		<description>FYI to Everyone;  I copied the pdf file for the new UC Electrode material.  Wow!:Here are some excerpts from it.  It looks to have 10-20 times more power density than Maxwell or NessCap.  It coule work for the Chevy Volt because it is super light.
\Here is the pdf:

 Reticle Carbon: Electrode Material for Ultracapacitors
Dr. Carl C. Nesbitt Reticle Inc. 334 State Street; Suite 204 Los Altos, California 94022
cnesbitt@mtu.edu Executive Summary: Reticle Inc. (a California-based company) has developed a unique electrode material (Reticle Carbon) which is ideally suited for electric double-layer (EDL) ultracapacitors. Reticle Carbon is simple to manufacture, yet has low electrical resistivities (0.04-0.130 -cm), demonstrated high surface areas (1,250-1,750 m2/g), and the highest reported specific capacitance (200-310 F/g). It is produced by consolidating granular activated carbon that has been selected for its properties. That is, only activated carbon is used to make Reticle Carbon—no binders, no fillers, no adhesives. The manufacturing process is single-stage, but flexible enough so that we can tailor the properties of the material for ultracapacitors. Most electrode materials are limited to thin layers or thin films by the manufacturing processes. Reticle Carbon is unique in being the only material that can be cut to any thickness to meet any capacitance needed. This paper emphasizes this difference and presents the wide range of properties with the underlying theory to store energy in the massive surface area of the material. A comparison of our preliminary capacitors with commercial capacitors is included. 

SUMMARY
Reticle Carbon has unique properties that allow it to be an efficient electrode material in ultracapacitors. The material has surface areas in excess of 1,700 m2/g, which give the material a specific capacitance of 300 F/g. Ultracapacitors made with material with 1,240 m2/g have energy densities of 26 Wh/kg and power densities of 31 kW/kg at a 2-V potential. With modification and design optimization these levels will be exceeded in next generation Reticle ultracapacitors. The most significant contribution that Reticle Carbon provides is the flexibility of providing any thickness (hence any mass) of electrode to a capacitor. This simple distinction sets Reticle Carbon apart from other electrode materials which must be kept thin for efficiency or because of the restrictions to the steps to manufacture the material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI to Everyone;  I copied the pdf file for the new UC Electrode material.  Wow!:Here are some excerpts from it.  It looks to have 10-20 times more power density than Maxwell or NessCap.  It coule work for the Chevy Volt because it is super light.<br />
\Here is the pdf:</p>
<p> Reticle Carbon: Electrode Material for Ultracapacitors<br />
Dr. Carl C. Nesbitt Reticle Inc. 334 State Street; Suite 204 Los Altos, California 94022<br />
<a href="mailto:cnesbitt@mtu.edu">cnesbitt@mtu.edu</a> Executive Summary: Reticle Inc. (a California-based company) has developed a unique electrode material (Reticle Carbon) which is ideally suited for electric double-layer (EDL) ultracapacitors. Reticle Carbon is simple to manufacture, yet has low electrical resistivities (0.04-0.130 -cm), demonstrated high surface areas (1,250-1,750 m2/g), and the highest reported specific capacitance (200-310 F/g). It is produced by consolidating granular activated carbon that has been selected for its properties. That is, only activated carbon is used to make Reticle Carbon—no binders, no fillers, no adhesives. The manufacturing process is single-stage, but flexible enough so that we can tailor the properties of the material for ultracapacitors. Most electrode materials are limited to thin layers or thin films by the manufacturing processes. Reticle Carbon is unique in being the only material that can be cut to any thickness to meet any capacitance needed. This paper emphasizes this difference and presents the wide range of properties with the underlying theory to store energy in the massive surface area of the material. A comparison of our preliminary capacitors with commercial capacitors is included. </p>
<p>SUMMARY<br />
Reticle Carbon has unique properties that allow it to be an efficient electrode material in ultracapacitors. The material has surface areas in excess of 1,700 m2/g, which give the material a specific capacitance of 300 F/g. Ultracapacitors made with material with 1,240 m2/g have energy densities of 26 Wh/kg and power densities of 31 kW/kg at a 2-V potential. With modification and design optimization these levels will be exceeded in next generation Reticle ultracapacitors. The most significant contribution that Reticle Carbon provides is the flexibility of providing any thickness (hence any mass) of electrode to a capacitor. This simple distinction sets Reticle Carbon apart from other electrode materials which must be kept thin for efficiency or because of the restrictions to the steps to manufacture the material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackM</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/#comment-99086</link>
		<dc:creator>JackM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1451#comment-99086</guid>
		<description>Has anyone seen the article about a new electrode technology on Ultracapacitors.org?  If this works, it could maybe help EEStor not have to charge up as much. If that would be of any help?
The Web manager, Greg Allen says that the author is going to be at the World Advanced Capacitor Summit at the end of the month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone seen the article about a new electrode technology on Ultracapacitors.org?  If this works, it could maybe help EEStor not have to charge up as much. If that would be of any help?<br />
The Web manager, Greg Allen says that the author is going to be at the World Advanced Capacitor Summit at the end of the month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingfish</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/#comment-97327</link>
		<dc:creator>kingfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1451#comment-97327</guid>
		<description>Hello everybody,
Whats up, everythings gone silent? 
Has Eestor, sold out? Been bought out and shut up? Or have they hit the wall? 
Anybody - anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello everybody,<br />
Whats up, everythings gone silent?<br />
Has Eestor, sold out? Been bought out and shut up? Or have they hit the wall?<br />
Anybody &#8211; anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackM</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/#comment-96090</link>
		<dc:creator>JackM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1451#comment-96090</guid>
		<description>#18 Dave G:
Dave, you are right.  But, I think the 24V model is for the electric bike they licensed to.  Read my #98, please and give your comments.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#18 Dave G:<br />
Dave, you are right.  But, I think the 24V model is for the electric bike they licensed to.  Read my #98, please and give your comments.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackM</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/04/eestor-gets-a-trademark-patent-on-eesu-and-provides-specs-for-a-24v-eesu/#comment-96084</link>
		<dc:creator>JackM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1451#comment-96084</guid>
		<description>#68 Rick King
Rick, I think the 24 volt EESU is for the electric bike they licensed with, not for an EV.  If it was a step-down version of the 3500 volt unit it would cost a lot more than $62.50.  So we go back to some of the original problems, like where do we get 3500 volts to charge it without impacting the grid, and what does the charging heat do to the bonded dissimilar materials. (Different coefficients of exapnsion).  Will they  bend  like a bi-metal strip?  (Thermostat).  Ceramics don&#039;t bend too well without cracking.  I think it is possible that this is the problem they are presently facing.  Anyone disagre?
I&#039;m open to be wrong about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#68 Rick King<br />
Rick, I think the 24 volt EESU is for the electric bike they licensed with, not for an EV.  If it was a step-down version of the 3500 volt unit it would cost a lot more than $62.50.  So we go back to some of the original problems, like where do we get 3500 volts to charge it without impacting the grid, and what does the charging heat do to the bonded dissimilar materials. (Different coefficients of exapnsion).  Will they  bend  like a bi-metal strip?  (Thermostat).  Ceramics don&#8217;t bend too well without cracking.  I think it is possible that this is the problem they are presently facing.  Anyone disagre?<br />
I&#8217;m open to be wrong about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.391 seconds -->
