<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Future Volt Competition?:  Lotus E-REVs and Solar-Powered Toyotas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:26:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amboseli Oliphant</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/#comment-121433</link>
		<dc:creator>Amboseli Oliphant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1452#comment-121433</guid>
		<description>Lets see. We build a quarter million Volts a year and some whacko sets off an EMP generator someplace in California.

Volt electronics could get fried. Can you say 40 thousand dollar paperweight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets see. We build a quarter million Volts a year and some whacko sets off an EMP generator someplace in California.</p>
<p>Volt electronics could get fried. Can you say 40 thousand dollar paperweight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveP</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/#comment-88989</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1452#comment-88989</guid>
		<description>I hope it&#039;s basically the Zap-X (Lotus APX body) with a range extender.  I&#039;d really love to have ~600hp and AWD (wheel motors) with a third row of jump seats.  I&#039;d heard that Lotus had actually built and demonstrated prototypes in Malaysia (where their owners are) so it might very well be possible although I&#039;d never seen any evidence (like photos or video) on the web.
And Lotus is kind of pricey, but it&#039;s not crazy expensive.  Back in the dot-com boom, the Elise was in the mid 30&#039;s and there were tons of them around here because it was one of the cheaper, er, flamboyant cars you could get.  These days they&#039;re in the upper 40&#039;s, though, so they&#039;ve kind of moved up in price.  I blame the Boxter for that.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it&#8217;s basically the Zap-X (Lotus APX body) with a range extender.  I&#8217;d really love to have ~600hp and AWD (wheel motors) with a third row of jump seats.  I&#8217;d heard that Lotus had actually built and demonstrated prototypes in Malaysia (where their owners are) so it might very well be possible although I&#8217;d never seen any evidence (like photos or video) on the web.<br />
And Lotus is kind of pricey, but it&#8217;s not crazy expensive.  Back in the dot-com boom, the Elise was in the mid 30&#8217;s and there were tons of them around here because it was one of the cheaper, er, flamboyant cars you could get.  These days they&#8217;re in the upper 40&#8217;s, though, so they&#8217;ve kind of moved up in price.  I blame the Boxter for that.  <img src='http://gm-volt.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie h</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/#comment-88978</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1452#comment-88978</guid>
		<description>#11 (and subsequent notes), Arch,  You WERE trolling, dropping your triumphant tidbit right out of the blue.

And you troll poorly; that article is a half-truth.  GLOBAL sea ice hasn&#039;t changed much (although it is clearly trending down).  Antarctica, as has been pointed out MANY times, is fairly stable (possibly benefitting from increased precipitation).  The problem rests in the Arctic Ocean, where loss of sea ice decreases the Earth&#039;s albedo, which leads to further warming.  For the second year in a row, our sea ice extent at the end of the year is extremely low, compared to the average of the observed record.

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/index.html

I notice Asher refers to the NSIDC but does not link to it.  That would be easily done, wouldn&#039;t it?  I&#039;d guess he prefers you not get the full picture but instead wants you to rely on what he has cherry-picked for you.  Some people, especially those politically motivated to deride legitimate scientific effort, can be counted on to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#11 (and subsequent notes), Arch,  You WERE trolling, dropping your triumphant tidbit right out of the blue.</p>
<p>And you troll poorly; that article is a half-truth.  GLOBAL sea ice hasn&#8217;t changed much (although it is clearly trending down).  Antarctica, as has been pointed out MANY times, is fairly stable (possibly benefitting from increased precipitation).  The problem rests in the Arctic Ocean, where loss of sea ice decreases the Earth&#8217;s albedo, which leads to further warming.  For the second year in a row, our sea ice extent at the end of the year is extremely low, compared to the average of the observed record.</p>
<p><a href="http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/index.html</a></p>
<p>I notice Asher refers to the NSIDC but does not link to it.  That would be easily done, wouldn&#8217;t it?  I&#8217;d guess he prefers you not get the full picture but instead wants you to rely on what he has cherry-picked for you.  Some people, especially those politically motivated to deride legitimate scientific effort, can be counted on to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noel park</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/#comment-88976</link>
		<dc:creator>noel park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1452#comment-88976</guid>
		<description>#69 DaveK:

Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#69 DaveK:</p>
<p>Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N Riley</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/#comment-88962</link>
		<dc:creator>N Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1452#comment-88962</guid>
		<description>With Lotus getting into the E-REV business it is another milestone towards electrifying our automobiles.  Lotus will sell towards the high end like Tesla.  The lower end will be served by GM, Ford and others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Lotus getting into the E-REV business it is another milestone towards electrifying our automobiles.  Lotus will sell towards the high end like Tesla.  The lower end will be served by GM, Ford and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k-dawg</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/#comment-88948</link>
		<dc:creator>k-dawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1452#comment-88948</guid>
		<description>GM already built a solar powered car in 1998 called the Sunraycer.  It won the race in Australia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM already built a solar powered car in 1998 called the Sunraycer.  It won the race in Australia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stas peterson</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/#comment-88874</link>
		<dc:creator>stas peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1452#comment-88874</guid>
		<description>David G  #71

The reason that no one build  these damn thermally polluting, and albedo-altering, producing genuine AGW 100 of times as powerful as GHG, is because they don&#039;t make the least bit of economic sense.

Solar is inefficient, terribly inefficient.  Would you want to buy power from an  Utility that charges 50 cents per KWH when someone else charges you 5 cents per KWH?  Are you ready to pay $1000 per month for your electric bill if you presently pay $100 per month?  

Only committed Gian religious Enviro-Crusaders, who don&#039;t and can&#039;t think rationally do.  And can force or elect their own Utility commissions to build such economic pink elephants.  And only at the margin, usually as &quot;demonstration projects&quot;. Projects that once built, and the PR photos taken and distributed; commission politicians speeches and press conferences made; promptly are mothballed and dragged out for annual &quot;photo shoots&quot; for the covers of the Utilities  financial  statement as &quot;Greenwash&quot;.    

In the vernacular, they Suck. And they will always Suck. 

Next question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David G  #71</p>
<p>The reason that no one build  these damn thermally polluting, and albedo-altering, producing genuine AGW 100 of times as powerful as GHG, is because they don&#8217;t make the least bit of economic sense.</p>
<p>Solar is inefficient, terribly inefficient.  Would you want to buy power from an  Utility that charges 50 cents per KWH when someone else charges you 5 cents per KWH?  Are you ready to pay $1000 per month for your electric bill if you presently pay $100 per month?  </p>
<p>Only committed Gian religious Enviro-Crusaders, who don&#8217;t and can&#8217;t think rationally do.  And can force or elect their own Utility commissions to build such economic pink elephants.  And only at the margin, usually as &#8220;demonstration projects&#8221;. Projects that once built, and the PR photos taken and distributed; commission politicians speeches and press conferences made; promptly are mothballed and dragged out for annual &#8220;photo shoots&#8221; for the covers of the Utilities  financial  statement as &#8220;Greenwash&#8221;.    </p>
<p>In the vernacular, they Suck. And they will always Suck. </p>
<p>Next question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThombDbhomb</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/#comment-88859</link>
		<dc:creator>ThombDbhomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1452#comment-88859</guid>
		<description>#70 Dave G
As I said in #49, solar cars exist. They have gone across continents at decent speeds. They may be specialized vehicles at present, but so was the Wright brothers flying machine at Kitty Hawk. You know how that took off. Don&#039;t be so quick to pooh pooh solar cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#70 Dave G<br />
As I said in #49, solar cars exist. They have gone across continents at decent speeds. They may be specialized vehicles at present, but so was the Wright brothers flying machine at Kitty Hawk. You know how that took off. Don&#8217;t be so quick to pooh pooh solar cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThombDbhomb</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/#comment-88858</link>
		<dc:creator>ThombDbhomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1452#comment-88858</guid>
		<description>#64 Arch

Thanks for making my point and admitting that you were trolling.

PDNFTT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#64 Arch</p>
<p>Thanks for making my point and admitting that you were trolling.</p>
<p>PDNFTT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rashiid Amul</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2009/01/03/more-future-volt-competition-lotus-e-revs-and-solar-powered-toyotas/#comment-88843</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashiid Amul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1452#comment-88843</guid>
		<description>I do believe in climate change.

I have no idea what to believe for the reason why it is happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe in climate change.</p>
<p>I have no idea what to believe for the reason why it is happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.386 seconds -->
