<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next Generation Chevy Volt Might Have 80 Mile Electric Range With Same Size Battery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:07:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/#comment-150589</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1331#comment-150589</guid>
		<description>That would be good news if they could al least double the electric only range!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be good news if they could al least double the electric only range!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/#comment-100404</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1331#comment-100404</guid>
		<description>An all-electric range of 80 miles would be a Godsend for people whose daily commute exceeds the current 40 mile range (my commute is about 70 miles per day). It would also easily cover all of my routine weekend errand driving. Basically, I&#039;d use gasonline very infrequently.

With luck, I&#039;ll be able to pick up a first-gen Volt, enjoy its 40 mile all-electric range, and then upgrade to an 80 mile battery when it&#039;s available.

Go GM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An all-electric range of 80 miles would be a Godsend for people whose daily commute exceeds the current 40 mile range (my commute is about 70 miles per day). It would also easily cover all of my routine weekend errand driving. Basically, I&#8217;d use gasonline very infrequently.</p>
<p>With luck, I&#8217;ll be able to pick up a first-gen Volt, enjoy its 40 mile all-electric range, and then upgrade to an 80 mile battery when it&#8217;s available.</p>
<p>Go GM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILLIAM HUSAR</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/#comment-74697</link>
		<dc:creator>WILLIAM HUSAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 01:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1331#comment-74697</guid>
		<description>delete the gas engine  solution install on rear wheel rim a ring gear an pinion gear on generator shaft kinetic energy from wheel rotation charges batteery pack optimum gear ratio for rpm`s    consider   over nite charge 40% chaege the generator kicks in above 15 mph  no plug in req`d you arrive where ever  with battery charged  SLAM DUNK LOCKHEED ENGINEER  BILL HUSAR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>delete the gas engine  solution install on rear wheel rim a ring gear an pinion gear on generator shaft kinetic energy from wheel rotation charges batteery pack optimum gear ratio for rpm`s    consider   over nite charge 40% chaege the generator kicks in above 15 mph  no plug in req`d you arrive where ever  with battery charged  SLAM DUNK LOCKHEED ENGINEER  BILL HUSAR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Petit</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/#comment-74265</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Petit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1331#comment-74265</guid>
		<description>&quot;Preventive maintenance engine run&quot; is likely on the engineer&#039;s table, and is a great idea.   More than a few minutes would be needed to clear a Catalytic Converter and light it up at 675 degrees or so to burn off traces of HC, as well as clear the exhaust of combustion water.  This may  be what GM engineering sees in modifying charge strategies.  
  Many scan tools have bi-directional controlling of the PCM already  for Commanded testing and Commanded Relearns of things like Crank sensor position, etc.  (if one is  extensively trained to analyze graphing).  More mundane toggles are available  such as turning off the automatic door locking subroutine which automatically locks all doors at ,   say,  20 mph.
  Licensing of these capabilities at a cost  (in a scan tool) is a good idea to keep inexperienced and unintentional activities/switching from occurring, causing unnecessary expense and damages  to the owner&#039;s property. 
 In analyzing thousands of waveforms over the years, the clear intent of everything that the OEM finalizes is simply to the the best things for  the owner.  
  I disagree with an Edmunds article I  just read where editors felt the need to apologize  for themselves for apparent inconsistencies/changes  of GM reps regarding charging strategies.  Clearing the Exhaust system may be one of those reasons.  (No,  you can&#039;t conceive of everything all at once when critical things must change in a design.)
This is an entirely NEW FIELD.  There just are not available &quot;definite&quot; specifications during any developmental phase of the Volt.  You can not know finally what any specification is going to be until you have amassed vast numbers of sample sizes to validate the usage needs of various demographics.   But the open discussions regarding various specs changes is clearly wise, since often some small comment or idea, or post containing one small little fact,   written early enough,  is each persons&#039; personal contribution to our futures,   If the &quot;Tipping Point&quot; has passed us by already,  then we still may be able to help make change feasible with our commentaries before we bypass our &quot;Adaptation Point&quot;.
I think all comments are important, even from angry people letting off their &quot;steam&quot; if they need to.
Dan Petit,  Austin, TX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Preventive maintenance engine run&#8221; is likely on the engineer&#8217;s table, and is a great idea.   More than a few minutes would be needed to clear a Catalytic Converter and light it up at 675 degrees or so to burn off traces of HC, as well as clear the exhaust of combustion water.  This may  be what GM engineering sees in modifying charge strategies.<br />
  Many scan tools have bi-directional controlling of the PCM already  for Commanded testing and Commanded Relearns of things like Crank sensor position, etc.  (if one is  extensively trained to analyze graphing).  More mundane toggles are available  such as turning off the automatic door locking subroutine which automatically locks all doors at ,   say,  20 mph.<br />
  Licensing of these capabilities at a cost  (in a scan tool) is a good idea to keep inexperienced and unintentional activities/switching from occurring, causing unnecessary expense and damages  to the owner&#8217;s property.<br />
 In analyzing thousands of waveforms over the years, the clear intent of everything that the OEM finalizes is simply to the the best things for  the owner.<br />
  I disagree with an Edmunds article I  just read where editors felt the need to apologize  for themselves for apparent inconsistencies/changes  of GM reps regarding charging strategies.  Clearing the Exhaust system may be one of those reasons.  (No,  you can&#8217;t conceive of everything all at once when critical things must change in a design.)<br />
This is an entirely NEW FIELD.  There just are not available &#8220;definite&#8221; specifications during any developmental phase of the Volt.  You can not know finally what any specification is going to be until you have amassed vast numbers of sample sizes to validate the usage needs of various demographics.   But the open discussions regarding various specs changes is clearly wise, since often some small comment or idea, or post containing one small little fact,   written early enough,  is each persons&#8217; personal contribution to our futures,   If the &#8220;Tipping Point&#8221; has passed us by already,  then we still may be able to help make change feasible with our commentaries before we bypass our &#8220;Adaptation Point&#8221;.<br />
I think all comments are important, even from angry people letting off their &#8220;steam&#8221; if they need to.<br />
Dan Petit,  Austin, TX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ro</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/#comment-74261</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Ro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1331#comment-74261</guid>
		<description>I for one would like more range. I drive 44 miles to work and back with a 600ft elevation hill near the end of my trip home so theres no way 40 will do for me unless I charge at work.  I&#039;d rather pay more and get 60 or 80 miles.  Then I can drop my plans of putting 6 or 8 golf cart batteries in the trunk with an inverter so I can charge the volt while I&#039;m at work...

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one would like more range. I drive 44 miles to work and back with a 600ft elevation hill near the end of my trip home so theres no way 40 will do for me unless I charge at work.  I&#8217;d rather pay more and get 60 or 80 miles.  Then I can drop my plans of putting 6 or 8 golf cart batteries in the trunk with an inverter so I can charge the volt while I&#8217;m at work&#8230;</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piugbsidbg</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/#comment-74174</link>
		<dc:creator>piugbsidbg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1331#comment-74174</guid>
		<description>this is gay[!@$^!##$]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is gay[!@$^!##$]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/#comment-74168</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1331#comment-74168</guid>
		<description>I think that this will be a big advance to the GM.

It will be great to have a electric car in this world.

Timothy Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this will be a big advance to the GM.</p>
<p>It will be great to have a electric car in this world.</p>
<p>Timothy Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darius</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/#comment-74135</link>
		<dc:creator>Darius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1331#comment-74135</guid>
		<description>Grizzly #125

Cellulosic ethanol is far away from being game changer. The production cost is rather high due to distillation process. Distillery itself consumes lot of steam in order to evaporate alcohol. Then you should have complicated sewage water treatment processes which are not available for the moment to be in economic way. 

You have advantage with grain slurry since cattle can consume it. What you going to do with biomass slurry? Only fertilizer and during limited period of the calendar year. So verayity of issues which are not solved and may be not solved at all. 

In ethanol price grain price was less than 50%. Last year it changed drastically. Then you shall be aware that the same problems you have with grain (you never know what price will be next year) you will face with biomass after significant volumes will be achieved. I personally have experience on wood chip prices and I tell you - they are extremely &quot;demand based&quot;!
On contrary power generation market is well established, country wide and we do not expect any drastic changes in the future. The PHEV&#039;s and even BEV&#039;s will never be game changes in good meaning of this word. Therefore I suggest that most convenient solution is PHEV and gradually shifting to the BEV. There is not better alternative and I do not expect any. Let’s concentrate on it.
I like algae process since it is completely integrated and more or less independent from outside market conditions. Another advantage - it will use obsolete area which will be not suitable for other crops. From technical point of view it is more advanced since algae owns most efficient photosynthesis on the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grizzly #125</p>
<p>Cellulosic ethanol is far away from being game changer. The production cost is rather high due to distillation process. Distillery itself consumes lot of steam in order to evaporate alcohol. Then you should have complicated sewage water treatment processes which are not available for the moment to be in economic way. </p>
<p>You have advantage with grain slurry since cattle can consume it. What you going to do with biomass slurry? Only fertilizer and during limited period of the calendar year. So verayity of issues which are not solved and may be not solved at all. </p>
<p>In ethanol price grain price was less than 50%. Last year it changed drastically. Then you shall be aware that the same problems you have with grain (you never know what price will be next year) you will face with biomass after significant volumes will be achieved. I personally have experience on wood chip prices and I tell you &#8211; they are extremely &#8220;demand based&#8221;!<br />
On contrary power generation market is well established, country wide and we do not expect any drastic changes in the future. The PHEV&#8217;s and even BEV&#8217;s will never be game changes in good meaning of this word. Therefore I suggest that most convenient solution is PHEV and gradually shifting to the BEV. There is not better alternative and I do not expect any. Let’s concentrate on it.<br />
I like algae process since it is completely integrated and more or less independent from outside market conditions. Another advantage &#8211; it will use obsolete area which will be not suitable for other crops. From technical point of view it is more advanced since algae owns most efficient photosynthesis on the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: js1219</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/#comment-74121</link>
		<dc:creator>js1219</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1331#comment-74121</guid>
		<description>Lyle................

Can you please dig around and find out if the reason they are using the same size &amp; shape is to be able to upgrade the first generation Volt to a better battery when available?

I am hoping they are desiging the current Volt with the physical ability and firmware ability to upgrade later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyle&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Can you please dig around and find out if the reason they are using the same size &amp; shape is to be able to upgrade the first generation Volt to a better battery when available?</p>
<p>I am hoping they are desiging the current Volt with the physical ability and firmware ability to upgrade later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: microbatman</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/10/13/next-generation-chevy-volt-might-have-80-mile-electric-range-with-same-size-battery/#comment-74118</link>
		<dc:creator>microbatman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1331#comment-74118</guid>
		<description>Cost??

How much does this magic/micro/nano dust cost?

Does it need to be mfg in a dry room?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cost??</p>
<p>How much does this magic/micro/nano dust cost?</p>
<p>Does it need to be mfg in a dry room?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.386 seconds -->
