<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LIVE:  GMnext Global Webcast (Starts 9/16 8:30 AM EDT):  Production Chevy Volt to be Revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:55:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: andrew m</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/#comment-69138</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1275#comment-69138</guid>
		<description>too bad it wouldn&#039;t go 80 or 100 miles on a charge then I could go to work with all electric!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too bad it wouldn&#8217;t go 80 or 100 miles on a charge then I could go to work with all electric!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeinatl.</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/#comment-68196</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeinatl.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1275#comment-68196</guid>
		<description>#139 Jim.

From #138 Mikeinatl.

I do not work for GM or own any GM stock.   In previous threads I have said things like, &quot;There is not one car in the current GM line that I would like to own.&quot;

In #138, I was simply stating my opinion that the production Volt was watered down to have a more universal appeal.  It also had to meet some pretty stringent wind drag parameters.  

But relax.  Once the first Volt hits the street, GM will build many more versions on that platform, perhaps even one that looks like the Concept Volt, my personal favorite.  That is what they have always done.  Coupe deVilles, Impalas, Corvettes, Saturns, Suburbans and on and on. 

This isn&#039;t the end.  This isn&#039;t even the beginning yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#139 Jim.</p>
<p>From #138 Mikeinatl.</p>
<p>I do not work for GM or own any GM stock.   In previous threads I have said things like, &#8220;There is not one car in the current GM line that I would like to own.&#8221;</p>
<p>In #138, I was simply stating my opinion that the production Volt was watered down to have a more universal appeal.  It also had to meet some pretty stringent wind drag parameters.  </p>
<p>But relax.  Once the first Volt hits the street, GM will build many more versions on that platform, perhaps even one that looks like the Concept Volt, my personal favorite.  That is what they have always done.  Coupe deVilles, Impalas, Corvettes, Saturns, Suburbans and on and on. </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the end.  This isn&#8217;t even the beginning yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/#comment-68174</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1275#comment-68174</guid>
		<description>Well, let’s face it, it&#039;s not the concept car which was much more edgy and projected the image of &quot;I&#039;ve got good taste, moving ahead into the future, successful, and I know you wish you had one of these&quot;. Now it’s more like &quot;I&#039;m just an average person and willing to settle for an average looking car rather than project success, so that I can save some money.&quot; I wanted one before, but now, it&#039;s just not hot enough. You have to project success in business based upon everything you surround yourself with. The final design does not project the image that the concept car did. Why do we all have to be like drones driving to work in the same car? Come on GM; push out those wheel wells and make me excited again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, let’s face it, it&#8217;s not the concept car which was much more edgy and projected the image of &#8220;I&#8217;ve got good taste, moving ahead into the future, successful, and I know you wish you had one of these&#8221;. Now it’s more like &#8220;I&#8217;m just an average person and willing to settle for an average looking car rather than project success, so that I can save some money.&#8221; I wanted one before, but now, it&#8217;s just not hot enough. You have to project success in business based upon everything you surround yourself with. The final design does not project the image that the concept car did. Why do we all have to be like drones driving to work in the same car? Come on GM; push out those wheel wells and make me excited again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carcus</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/#comment-68125</link>
		<dc:creator>Carcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1275#comment-68125</guid>
		<description>Lyle,

Did you happen to notice the marketing director&#039;s expression when she mentioned the internet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyle,</p>
<p>Did you happen to notice the marketing director&#8217;s expression when she mentioned the internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stew</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/#comment-67909</link>
		<dc:creator>Stew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1275#comment-67909</guid>
		<description>Holy crap that was unbearable to watch. Pick a freakin language and stick with it. I stopped watching about 20 min in to it.

I really don&#039;t want to have negative things to say but sheesh, that was like watching a bad Ronco infomercial. I realize GM is a global company but perhaps there should have been several smaller celebrations targeted to more focused populations rather than risking alienating americans.

Or hell, maybe it&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap that was unbearable to watch. Pick a freakin language and stick with it. I stopped watching about 20 min in to it.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t want to have negative things to say but sheesh, that was like watching a bad Ronco infomercial. I realize GM is a global company but perhaps there should have been several smaller celebrations targeted to more focused populations rather than risking alienating americans.</p>
<p>Or hell, maybe it&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/#comment-67891</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1275#comment-67891</guid>
		<description>&quot;The car is more expensive, but $40K might not be bad if you consider the expenses you could eliminate.&quot; Not bad??? What about the expense of replacing the batteries in a few years? I don&#039;t like paying $ 4.00+/gal for gas either but I don&#039;t see a $40K + car helping the general public stop our dependency on foreign oil. The price tag is way too high unless your part of John McCain&#039;s &quot;middle class&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The car is more expensive, but $40K might not be bad if you consider the expenses you could eliminate.&#8221; Not bad??? What about the expense of replacing the batteries in a few years? I don&#8217;t like paying $ 4.00+/gal for gas either but I don&#8217;t see a $40K + car helping the general public stop our dependency on foreign oil. The price tag is way too high unless your part of John McCain&#8217;s &#8220;middle class&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/#comment-67851</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1275#comment-67851</guid>
		<description>The car is more expensive, but $40K might not be bad if you consider the expenses you could eliminate.  

Electric motors are less complex than gas engines.  Since you would only use the internal combustion engine (ICE) during long trips, I can&#039;t imagine the ICE needing much recurring maintenance.  Plus, since the ICE is only generating electricity, the engine is not experiencing as much wear as one directly connected to a drive shaft.  Additionally, the ICE doesn&#039;t need to be complex to run at the constant RPM/load level required to turn a generator.

GM has to carefully weigh the maintenance and operation costs to make this vehicle worth its price.  This platform is a revolutionary jump in automotive technology that will be eventually used in other vehicle models.  GM is going to have to live with the Volt platform for a long time; they&#039;d better do it right.

If the ongoing maintenance and operations costs are significantly lower, I don&#039;t mind paying GM and the UAW workers a few thousand extra bucks on the initial purchase..  I don&#039;t like paying OPEC; OPEC is pure evil.

When you buy OPEC products, you might as well write a check directly to Al-Qaeda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The car is more expensive, but $40K might not be bad if you consider the expenses you could eliminate.  </p>
<p>Electric motors are less complex than gas engines.  Since you would only use the internal combustion engine (ICE) during long trips, I can&#8217;t imagine the ICE needing much recurring maintenance.  Plus, since the ICE is only generating electricity, the engine is not experiencing as much wear as one directly connected to a drive shaft.  Additionally, the ICE doesn&#8217;t need to be complex to run at the constant RPM/load level required to turn a generator.</p>
<p>GM has to carefully weigh the maintenance and operation costs to make this vehicle worth its price.  This platform is a revolutionary jump in automotive technology that will be eventually used in other vehicle models.  GM is going to have to live with the Volt platform for a long time; they&#8217;d better do it right.</p>
<p>If the ongoing maintenance and operations costs are significantly lower, I don&#8217;t mind paying GM and the UAW workers a few thousand extra bucks on the initial purchase..  I don&#8217;t like paying OPEC; OPEC is pure evil.</p>
<p>When you buy OPEC products, you might as well write a check directly to Al-Qaeda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/#comment-67843</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1275#comment-67843</guid>
		<description>I really, really like the production design.  I think it&#039;s going to be a killer product, as long as the quality is comparable with a Prius.  Quality in the production manufacture of the vehicle is GM&#039;s biggest hurdle, now.

Unfortunately, GM has a storied history of putting out a poor quality product on big projects like this one.  I&#039;m still traumatized by their first forays into fuel efficient cars in the 1980&#039;s.  I can&#039;t forget the torque wrench left in the flywheel of my father&#039;s car in 1983.  Of course, the GM dealers didn&#039;t &quot;find&quot; the real problem until the warranty ran out and, then, wanted to charge us $5000, in 1983 dollars, to remove the GM assembly line torque wrench.

My entire family has bought Fords and Toyotas for 25 years because of that incident.  That&#039;s about 10 cars GM lost to the competition over a wrench, then trying to cover up the real problem.

Today&#039;s Chevy Colbat is OK, but it just doesn&#039;t compare with a Japanese car in quality.  GM (and the UAW) need to realize that the entire future of the company evolves around this car.  If they put out a poorly assembled product after all the hype, the company is finished.

The original concept car, while cool, looked too much like an electric commuter vehicle.  The production Volt looks like something very practical, yet very stylish.

If the Volt can bring electric propulsion to Middle America, it will be a huge victory for GM and the environment.

Clearly, the design of this car is awesome.  If GM can keep its focus on quality, sign me up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really, really like the production design.  I think it&#8217;s going to be a killer product, as long as the quality is comparable with a Prius.  Quality in the production manufacture of the vehicle is GM&#8217;s biggest hurdle, now.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, GM has a storied history of putting out a poor quality product on big projects like this one.  I&#8217;m still traumatized by their first forays into fuel efficient cars in the 1980&#8217;s.  I can&#8217;t forget the torque wrench left in the flywheel of my father&#8217;s car in 1983.  Of course, the GM dealers didn&#8217;t &#8220;find&#8221; the real problem until the warranty ran out and, then, wanted to charge us $5000, in 1983 dollars, to remove the GM assembly line torque wrench.</p>
<p>My entire family has bought Fords and Toyotas for 25 years because of that incident.  That&#8217;s about 10 cars GM lost to the competition over a wrench, then trying to cover up the real problem.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s Chevy Colbat is OK, but it just doesn&#8217;t compare with a Japanese car in quality.  GM (and the UAW) need to realize that the entire future of the company evolves around this car.  If they put out a poorly assembled product after all the hype, the company is finished.</p>
<p>The original concept car, while cool, looked too much like an electric commuter vehicle.  The production Volt looks like something very practical, yet very stylish.</p>
<p>If the Volt can bring electric propulsion to Middle America, it will be a huge victory for GM and the environment.</p>
<p>Clearly, the design of this car is awesome.  If GM can keep its focus on quality, sign me up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stas peterson</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/#comment-67833</link>
		<dc:creator>stas peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1275#comment-67833</guid>
		<description>For all youi anti-American self-loathing haters. You have a simple choice that if you were in charge, you would not allow others to have.

Simply, Don&#039;t buy one!  (And get the hell out of the line.)

You can go sign up and register some more cemetery headstones.  Just  like your anti-American, self-loathing hero used to do, as  a &quot;Chicago-machine  Community Organizer&quot;.

Remember...  Vote Early.  And Vote Often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all youi anti-American self-loathing haters. You have a simple choice that if you were in charge, you would not allow others to have.</p>
<p>Simply, Don&#8217;t buy one!  (And get the hell out of the line.)</p>
<p>You can go sign up and register some more cemetery headstones.  Just  like your anti-American, self-loathing hero used to do, as  a &#8220;Chicago-machine  Community Organizer&#8221;.</p>
<p>Remember&#8230;  Vote Early.  And Vote Often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/15/live-gmnext-global-webcast-starts-916-830-am-est/#comment-67825</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1275#comment-67825</guid>
		<description>It would seem most of the comments here were written by GM PR people or those owning GM stock. &quot;Grannies and soccer moms and Joe Sixpacks&quot; are not going to drive a $40,000 car that seats 4. At that price, this is NOT a car for the masses. And after all the hype of the past year, the styling is a huge disappointment.  Instead of delivering the exciting beauty of the concept Chevrolet, you&#039;ve given us.....well.....another Chevy. That car, at that price, does not bode well for the next ten years at GM, and at that rate i can&#039;t imagine another one hundred. It&#039;s sad, very sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem most of the comments here were written by GM PR people or those owning GM stock. &#8220;Grannies and soccer moms and Joe Sixpacks&#8221; are not going to drive a $40,000 car that seats 4. At that price, this is NOT a car for the masses. And after all the hype of the past year, the styling is a huge disappointment.  Instead of delivering the exciting beauty of the concept Chevrolet, you&#8217;ve given us&#8230;..well&#8230;..another Chevy. That car, at that price, does not bode well for the next ten years at GM, and at that rate i can&#8217;t imagine another one hundred. It&#8217;s sad, very sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.388 seconds -->
