<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revenge of the Honda Insight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/04/revenge-of-the-honda-insight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/04/revenge-of-the-honda-insight/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:05:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billigflüge</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/04/revenge-of-the-honda-insight/#comment-78285</link>
		<dc:creator>Billigflüge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1259#comment-78285</guid>
		<description>:D It looks like a prius, that&#039;s right (it&#039;s ugly). I just wonder why you guys over there are so keen on hybrid and prius!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://gm-volt.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  It looks like a prius, that&#8217;s right (it&#8217;s ugly). I just wonder why you guys over there are so keen on hybrid and prius!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forgetGM</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/04/revenge-of-the-honda-insight/#comment-66345</link>
		<dc:creator>forgetGM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 03:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1259#comment-66345</guid>
		<description>Google:  &quot;who killed the electric car&quot;

Insight is going to own Volt, sorry to burst everyone&#039;s bubble.

oh, heh, &quot;bubble&quot;... pun intended...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google:  &#8220;who killed the electric car&#8221;</p>
<p>Insight is going to own Volt, sorry to burst everyone&#8217;s bubble.</p>
<p>oh, heh, &#8220;bubble&#8221;&#8230; pun intended&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dagwood55</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/04/revenge-of-the-honda-insight/#comment-65806</link>
		<dc:creator>dagwood55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1259#comment-65806</guid>
		<description>#55, Jim I, &quot;Struggle? How do you figure that?&quot;

Last fall, Lutz, who was &quot;personally&quot; supervising the Volt project, said they&#039;d have a driveable Volt &quot;by Easter Bunny time,&quot; and made some other, fairly obnoxious remarks, dissing Toyota&#039;s vehicle.  Turned out they did NOT have a driveable Volt by Easter Bunny time.  They haven&#039;t appeared to pick a battery supplier (at least, it looks like they haven&#039;t told the winner) and they only recently picked an engine.  They keep advertising the wrong body shell.

This is not the way a healthy project should run.  And they&#039;re doing this over a decade after others successfully launched hybrid cars.  And they&#039;re now begging for loans to make tooling for new-tech vehicles possible.  I&#039;d say &quot;struggles&quot; is entirely justified.

Toyota&#039;s got another round of cost reductions coming down the pike in their vehicle:

http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN0518895920080905?pageNumber=1&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10216&amp;sp=true

This is bad, bad, bad news for GM.

#59, MetrologyFirst,

I see no reason to ridicule your choice of car.  You&#039;re happy?  Fine.  However, I wouldn&#039;t endorse those as class-leading in reliability and I doubt that I&#039;d want one.  But that&#039;s not ridicule; tastes and expectations differ.

That also doesn&#039;t mean that I can&#039;t point to certain Pontiac design elements and say, &quot;ugly.&quot;  I do note that the &#039;03 doesn&#039;t have the ugly plastic cladding that many Pontiacs had.  That thick stuff with big cutaways for door clearance that looked really, really cheesy (Pontiac was not alone in this, I walk by a recent Chrysler with the same affliction every day and even a recent Honda).  The &#039;03 has an improved, cleaner look.

As it happens, I like the front-end treatment on most Pontiacs (e.g., I think the Vibe is better looking than the Matrix) but Pontiac has an unfortunate tendency to do weird things with the grille and intakes, sometimes putting in too many (e.g., Aztek) or making them look bizarre (a late Firebird got a very unfortunate &quot;snout&quot; treatment, looks like nostrils frmo some sort of dinosaur).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#55, Jim I, &#8220;Struggle? How do you figure that?&#8221;</p>
<p>Last fall, Lutz, who was &#8220;personally&#8221; supervising the Volt project, said they&#8217;d have a driveable Volt &#8220;by Easter Bunny time,&#8221; and made some other, fairly obnoxious remarks, dissing Toyota&#8217;s vehicle.  Turned out they did NOT have a driveable Volt by Easter Bunny time.  They haven&#8217;t appeared to pick a battery supplier (at least, it looks like they haven&#8217;t told the winner) and they only recently picked an engine.  They keep advertising the wrong body shell.</p>
<p>This is not the way a healthy project should run.  And they&#8217;re doing this over a decade after others successfully launched hybrid cars.  And they&#8217;re now begging for loans to make tooling for new-tech vehicles possible.  I&#8217;d say &#8220;struggles&#8221; is entirely justified.</p>
<p>Toyota&#8217;s got another round of cost reductions coming down the pike in their vehicle:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN0518895920080905?pageNumber=1&#038;virtualBrandChannel=10216&#038;sp=true" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN0518895920080905?pageNumber=1&#038;virtualBrandChannel=10216&#038;sp=true</a></p>
<p>This is bad, bad, bad news for GM.</p>
<p>#59, MetrologyFirst,</p>
<p>I see no reason to ridicule your choice of car.  You&#8217;re happy?  Fine.  However, I wouldn&#8217;t endorse those as class-leading in reliability and I doubt that I&#8217;d want one.  But that&#8217;s not ridicule; tastes and expectations differ.</p>
<p>That also doesn&#8217;t mean that I can&#8217;t point to certain Pontiac design elements and say, &#8220;ugly.&#8221;  I do note that the &#8217;03 doesn&#8217;t have the ugly plastic cladding that many Pontiacs had.  That thick stuff with big cutaways for door clearance that looked really, really cheesy (Pontiac was not alone in this, I walk by a recent Chrysler with the same affliction every day and even a recent Honda).  The &#8217;03 has an improved, cleaner look.</p>
<p>As it happens, I like the front-end treatment on most Pontiacs (e.g., I think the Vibe is better looking than the Matrix) but Pontiac has an unfortunate tendency to do weird things with the grille and intakes, sometimes putting in too many (e.g., Aztek) or making them look bizarre (a late Firebird got a very unfortunate &#8220;snout&#8221; treatment, looks like nostrils frmo some sort of dinosaur).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I. Ronnickly</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/04/revenge-of-the-honda-insight/#comment-65400</link>
		<dc:creator>I. Ronnickly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1259#comment-65400</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the wind tunnel making the cars look alike.  I saw a [non-hybrid] Civic next to a Prius I thought it was a newer Prius.

Form don&#039;t follow function for you guys, hunh? 

It&#039;s TOTALLY brain-dead, if a car review lists a vehicle&#039;s weight, not to have the co-efficient of drag in there. It&#039;s like physics.

Demand that your purple-prose car reviews tell the vehicle&#039;s cD.

Long live Phil Knox, and basjoos. [and google]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the wind tunnel making the cars look alike.  I saw a [non-hybrid] Civic next to a Prius I thought it was a newer Prius.</p>
<p>Form don&#8217;t follow function for you guys, hunh? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s TOTALLY brain-dead, if a car review lists a vehicle&#8217;s weight, not to have the co-efficient of drag in there. It&#8217;s like physics.</p>
<p>Demand that your purple-prose car reviews tell the vehicle&#8217;s cD.</p>
<p>Long live Phil Knox, and basjoos. [and google]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff M</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/09/04/revenge-of-the-honda-insight/#comment-64618</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1259#comment-64618</guid>
		<description>I read the 1st 30 or so comments and I&#039;m surprised (maybe a later comment addressed this)....

Am I the only one who thinks it sounds crazy for Honda to name this the same name as their discontinued 2 seater?  Aren&#039;t they worried about the confusion?  This sounds like a completely different car, different frame, a 5 seater, different skin, etc... anyone who didn&#039;t like the original Insight may not even look further.

And yea, as for the Volt being a Prius killer, that&#039;s Lyle&#039;s wishful thinking.  Volt and Prius are not only in two completely different price categories, the Volt is only a 4 seater, but also have two different target consumers... on top of that, the Volt won&#039;t be made in any meaningful quantity for at least another 4 years even if they were competing for the same customers.

Folks have to remember that it&#039;s going to take a bit longer to completely electrify general transportation, so any high mileage vehicles, be conventional ICE, BEV&#039;s (pure or series hybrids like Volt), or other hybrids, is going to help us wean ourselves off fossil fuels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the 1st 30 or so comments and I&#8217;m surprised (maybe a later comment addressed this)&#8230;.</p>
<p>Am I the only one who thinks it sounds crazy for Honda to name this the same name as their discontinued 2 seater?  Aren&#8217;t they worried about the confusion?  This sounds like a completely different car, different frame, a 5 seater, different skin, etc&#8230; anyone who didn&#8217;t like the original Insight may not even look further.</p>
<p>And yea, as for the Volt being a Prius killer, that&#8217;s Lyle&#8217;s wishful thinking.  Volt and Prius are not only in two completely different price categories, the Volt is only a 4 seater, but also have two different target consumers&#8230; on top of that, the Volt won&#8217;t be made in any meaningful quantity for at least another 4 years even if they were competing for the same customers.</p>
<p>Folks have to remember that it&#8217;s going to take a bit longer to completely electrify general transportation, so any high mileage vehicles, be conventional ICE, BEV&#8217;s (pure or series hybrids like Volt), or other hybrids, is going to help us wean ourselves off fossil fuels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 407/411 objects using apc

Served from: gm-volt.com @ 2012-05-25 11:11:11 -->
