<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING: Production VOLT Spied!!  The REAL DEAL!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/28/breaking-production-volt-spied-the-real-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/28/breaking-production-volt-spied-the-real-deal/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/28/breaking-production-volt-spied-the-real-deal/#comment-93671</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1248#comment-93671</guid>
		<description>to matt p. who said &quot;I would guess this one is maybe 2 or 3 more prototype phases away from production.&quot;

you have to be kidding right? the car is a year away from market. you expect them to completely tool all the factories, start manufacturing and ordering parts, then train the workers, do runthroughs of the assembly to fine tune production and then start manufacturing and have 60,000 units ready and shipped for the launch in just a few weeks after these design phases?

seriously. look at all new cars released in the last 20 years or so (and not just ones simply getting facelifts and updates, totally new vehicles) and you can see most are production ready for 6m to a year before launch. most recently the hyundai genesis. production model was shown 9 months before it was available to buy.

transformers is not the first movie to use a car not released yet as a featured product and advertisement. GM paid big money to get the car in that movie. knowing full well there are hundrends of crew that could potentially leak photos. not to mention that its being filmed in public and not in a secured private location. im sure they would prefer not to have the pictures released but knew this would happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to matt p. who said &#8220;I would guess this one is maybe 2 or 3 more prototype phases away from production.&#8221;</p>
<p>you have to be kidding right? the car is a year away from market. you expect them to completely tool all the factories, start manufacturing and ordering parts, then train the workers, do runthroughs of the assembly to fine tune production and then start manufacturing and have 60,000 units ready and shipped for the launch in just a few weeks after these design phases?</p>
<p>seriously. look at all new cars released in the last 20 years or so (and not just ones simply getting facelifts and updates, totally new vehicles) and you can see most are production ready for 6m to a year before launch. most recently the hyundai genesis. production model was shown 9 months before it was available to buy.</p>
<p>transformers is not the first movie to use a car not released yet as a featured product and advertisement. GM paid big money to get the car in that movie. knowing full well there are hundrends of crew that could potentially leak photos. not to mention that its being filmed in public and not in a secured private location. im sure they would prefer not to have the pictures released but knew this would happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eightjack</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/28/breaking-production-volt-spied-the-real-deal/#comment-89116</link>
		<dc:creator>Eightjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1248#comment-89116</guid>
		<description>Statik hits the nail on the head.  

  This is a visually boring exterior package.  Very boring.   Hopefully people will still buy it because they are excited by the technology, or want to boost American cars, or predict gas prices will shoot through the roof.  But the visual design is hum-drum, and that seems like an unneccesary handicap to sales.  What is the freaking deal with GM and car design?  It seems like theres some kind of corporate-culture mojo that works to shave anything interesting off all new vehicle designs from about 1980 on. Too much committee think? 
  And what is the deal with the hysterical boosterism on this site concerning the cars appearance?  Are you people hired shills for the company, trying desperately to manufacture positive buzz? I mean seriously, almost every interested citizen on this site hopes the volt will succeed, thats why we come to the site.   Lying about its looks, whether you are hired shills or genuinely confused by your own enthusiasm for the project,  just seems crazy to the outside world. The technology is spectacular. The appearance is dull.   This will be immediately apparent to the general public, and fooling ourselves is simply dangerous to the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Statik hits the nail on the head.  </p>
<p>  This is a visually boring exterior package.  Very boring.   Hopefully people will still buy it because they are excited by the technology, or want to boost American cars, or predict gas prices will shoot through the roof.  But the visual design is hum-drum, and that seems like an unneccesary handicap to sales.  What is the freaking deal with GM and car design?  It seems like theres some kind of corporate-culture mojo that works to shave anything interesting off all new vehicle designs from about 1980 on. Too much committee think?<br />
  And what is the deal with the hysterical boosterism on this site concerning the cars appearance?  Are you people hired shills for the company, trying desperately to manufacture positive buzz? I mean seriously, almost every interested citizen on this site hopes the volt will succeed, thats why we come to the site.   Lying about its looks, whether you are hired shills or genuinely confused by your own enthusiasm for the project,  just seems crazy to the outside world. The technology is spectacular. The appearance is dull.   This will be immediately apparent to the general public, and fooling ourselves is simply dangerous to the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rullo</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/28/breaking-production-volt-spied-the-real-deal/#comment-82629</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rullo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1248#comment-82629</guid>
		<description>If forgetgm loves his Toyota thats fine, but 50% of americans want cars from american companies. There are 20 car companies selling in this country and the big three still have a 50% market share. Yes there are issues that UAW and the companies need to address and some of them already are. Layoffs and buyouts are being replaced by lower wage workers. But you cannot fault either side for the wages, benefits and retirement being paid. These have accumulated over 100 years and when GM was making billions in profit the workers wanted a share. Now they need to give some back to keep the company and thrir job.

As far as the car, I think it is the next generation of the Ford Focus. Looking at the rear and the fuzzy pictures in profile it does not look like the VOLT.  Look at the fender vents, tail lights and grill, all look like Ford. Either way I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If forgetgm loves his Toyota thats fine, but 50% of americans want cars from american companies. There are 20 car companies selling in this country and the big three still have a 50% market share. Yes there are issues that UAW and the companies need to address and some of them already are. Layoffs and buyouts are being replaced by lower wage workers. But you cannot fault either side for the wages, benefits and retirement being paid. These have accumulated over 100 years and when GM was making billions in profit the workers wanted a share. Now they need to give some back to keep the company and thrir job.</p>
<p>As far as the car, I think it is the next generation of the Ford Focus. Looking at the rear and the fuzzy pictures in profile it does not look like the VOLT.  Look at the fender vents, tail lights and grill, all look like Ford. Either way I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forgetGM</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/28/breaking-production-volt-spied-the-real-deal/#comment-66337</link>
		<dc:creator>forgetGM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1248#comment-66337</guid>
		<description>...too bad the Volt isn&#039;t really an electric car!

It only has a battery for 40 miles, then uses GAS to recharge.  Lame.

It costs $40,000?  Buy a Hyundai for $8000 that gets +34mpg city, and better on the hwy.  You will never, ever, ever, ever, ever save enough on gas over the [short] life of the Volt to ever, ever, ever, ever be worth $40k.

GM is delivering a marketing ploy here, not an electric car.  They already delivered the electric car (EV-1 , aka - &quot;Impact&quot;) back in 1992, had their chance, and wasted it.  Several hundred were produced, priced at $23-28k, and sold out immediately.  They topped at 120mph, and went about 200 miles on a full charge, and were ALL 100% pure electric.  They were all sold on leases, repossessed, and crushed.

Now 16 years later, with better batteries, better motors, better technology all around, how can anyone intelligent honestly believe that the Volt is the best they can do?  NO!

Let Ford wither and die for their stupidity and failure to deliver a quality, competetive product.  Let Chrysler wither and die for their stupidity and failure to deliver a quality, competetive product.  Let GM wither and die for their stupidity and failure to deliver a quality, competetive product, and lieing, and selling out, and holding out.

The Volt is underdesigned and overpriced - have more respect for yourselves than falling for this spew from GM.

PS - you won&#039;t save Detroit until you ban unions and reform healthcare.  Workers earn $60-90 per HOUR (more than a doctor or pharmacist!) for unskilled labor.  They spend about $1500 per car on worker healthcare insurance... Toyota spends $300.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;too bad the Volt isn&#8217;t really an electric car!</p>
<p>It only has a battery for 40 miles, then uses GAS to recharge.  Lame.</p>
<p>It costs $40,000?  Buy a Hyundai for $8000 that gets +34mpg city, and better on the hwy.  You will never, ever, ever, ever, ever save enough on gas over the [short] life of the Volt to ever, ever, ever, ever be worth $40k.</p>
<p>GM is delivering a marketing ploy here, not an electric car.  They already delivered the electric car (EV-1 , aka &#8211; &#8220;Impact&#8221;) back in 1992, had their chance, and wasted it.  Several hundred were produced, priced at $23-28k, and sold out immediately.  They topped at 120mph, and went about 200 miles on a full charge, and were ALL 100% pure electric.  They were all sold on leases, repossessed, and crushed.</p>
<p>Now 16 years later, with better batteries, better motors, better technology all around, how can anyone intelligent honestly believe that the Volt is the best they can do?  NO!</p>
<p>Let Ford wither and die for their stupidity and failure to deliver a quality, competetive product.  Let Chrysler wither and die for their stupidity and failure to deliver a quality, competetive product.  Let GM wither and die for their stupidity and failure to deliver a quality, competetive product, and lieing, and selling out, and holding out.</p>
<p>The Volt is underdesigned and overpriced &#8211; have more respect for yourselves than falling for this spew from GM.</p>
<p>PS &#8211; you won&#8217;t save Detroit until you ban unions and reform healthcare.  Workers earn $60-90 per HOUR (more than a doctor or pharmacist!) for unskilled labor.  They spend about $1500 per car on worker healthcare insurance&#8230; Toyota spends $300.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comparison Shop Event Tickets</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/28/breaking-production-volt-spied-the-real-deal/#comment-63574</link>
		<dc:creator>Comparison Shop Event Tickets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1248#comment-63574</guid>
		<description>This car looks like a hit!  I think it really has the potential to save detrioit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This car looks like a hit!  I think it really has the potential to save detrioit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
