<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the Chevy Volt Operates Past the Customer Depletion Point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:55:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anatole Maher</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/#comment-138137</link>
		<dc:creator>Anatole Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1232#comment-138137</guid>
		<description>&quot;.. “If you have a propulsion system in which a small efficient gasoline engine powers an onboard generator which in turn supplies electrical energy to an electric motor to propel the car at 50 mpg, why would you not employ this system as a mainline powerplant without the expensive batteries?..&quot;

That same thought occurred to me&#039;
I would assume the 50 mpg is obtained by  recovering regeneration energy  during deceleration which  would   otherwise be dissipated as heat when braking a car with straight ICE drive and transmission
They have to store this regeneration energy  somewhere, hence the  battery
the minus side of course is the expensive battery which weighs 400 lbs  and occupies space, and battery maintenance  which is still an unknown factor.
How many persons could afford/would purchase a car transporting 4 persons for 40 thousand dollars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;.. “If you have a propulsion system in which a small efficient gasoline engine powers an onboard generator which in turn supplies electrical energy to an electric motor to propel the car at 50 mpg, why would you not employ this system as a mainline powerplant without the expensive batteries?..&#8221;</p>
<p>That same thought occurred to me&#8217;<br />
I would assume the 50 mpg is obtained by  recovering regeneration energy  during deceleration which  would   otherwise be dissipated as heat when braking a car with straight ICE drive and transmission<br />
They have to store this regeneration energy  somewhere, hence the  battery<br />
the minus side of course is the expensive battery which weighs 400 lbs  and occupies space, and battery maintenance  which is still an unknown factor.<br />
How many persons could afford/would purchase a car transporting 4 persons for 40 thousand dollars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anatole Maher</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/#comment-138130</link>
		<dc:creator>Anatole Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1232#comment-138130</guid>
		<description>&quot;..since a HPhr of energy generated by the ICE costs about 3 times as much as a HPhr of energy drawn from the battery, you want to run the ICE as little as possible..&quot;

I am addressing only this part of your comment. How did you arrive at this conclusion?
Here in Jacksonville Fl regular gasoline with about 10 percent alcohol retails for $2.60  I estimate the energy content about 35 kwh per gallon of the mixture (I may not be accurate, if so, please correct
0.9 gal regular gasoline = 0.9 x 125,000 =112,500 BTU
0.1 gal ethanol              = 0.1 x 84,000   =    8,400 BTU
Total energy content of mixture              =120,900 BTU =35.4 kwH
GM says it uses a 1 litre turbo charged gasoline engine, I don&#039;t know its efficiency, let&#039;s assume 0.30 also a generator eff of 0.92
Combined eff = 0.28
output = 9.8 kwH per gallon of mixture @ $2.60
Cost per kwH from the ICE = 26.6 cents
I paid 12.83 cents per kwH on my last bill, the ratio is about 2:1
As an aside, an article in our local paper quoted MrHenderson  ceo of GM as stating that &quot;the cost of charging the Volt  is about 40 cents  a day at 5 cents per kwH&quot;   That&#039;s for 8 kwH driving 40 miles.
1 cent a mile!!!!
I assume Mr Henderson has solar panels on his roof or GM pays his electric bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;..since a HPhr of energy generated by the ICE costs about 3 times as much as a HPhr of energy drawn from the battery, you want to run the ICE as little as possible..&#8221;</p>
<p>I am addressing only this part of your comment. How did you arrive at this conclusion?<br />
Here in Jacksonville Fl regular gasoline with about 10 percent alcohol retails for $2.60  I estimate the energy content about 35 kwh per gallon of the mixture (I may not be accurate, if so, please correct<br />
0.9 gal regular gasoline = 0.9 x 125,000 =112,500 BTU<br />
0.1 gal ethanol              = 0.1 x 84,000   =    8,400 BTU<br />
Total energy content of mixture              =120,900 BTU =35.4 kwH<br />
GM says it uses a 1 litre turbo charged gasoline engine, I don&#8217;t know its efficiency, let&#8217;s assume 0.30 also a generator eff of 0.92<br />
Combined eff = 0.28<br />
output = 9.8 kwH per gallon of mixture @ $2.60<br />
Cost per kwH from the ICE = 26.6 cents<br />
I paid 12.83 cents per kwH on my last bill, the ratio is about 2:1<br />
As an aside, an article in our local paper quoted MrHenderson  ceo of GM as stating that &#8220;the cost of charging the Volt  is about 40 cents  a day at 5 cents per kwH&#8221;   That&#8217;s for 8 kwH driving 40 miles.<br />
1 cent a mile!!!!<br />
I assume Mr Henderson has solar panels on his roof or GM pays his electric bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anatole Maher</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/#comment-138117</link>
		<dc:creator>Anatole Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1232#comment-138117</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been searching for that information also, as well as some spec on the electric motor and drive train. (Asynchronous, 120 kw,  3 phase, frequency controlled? with a reduction gear?)
I live in Florida where the temperatures have been over 90F these past few weeks, so I use the A/C every time I step in the car and if I leave it 45 minutes in a parking lot the steering wheel gets too  hot to hold. A similar situation, in reverse, would apply to those pore guys who live up north , in those cold dark winter days Half an hour to defrost the windshield..Brrrh!
No one in these discussions seems to use air conditioning in the summer or heat in the winter.Have you any idea how much energy those require, presumably from the same battery pack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been searching for that information also, as well as some spec on the electric motor and drive train. (Asynchronous, 120 kw,  3 phase, frequency controlled? with a reduction gear?)<br />
I live in Florida where the temperatures have been over 90F these past few weeks, so I use the A/C every time I step in the car and if I leave it 45 minutes in a parking lot the steering wheel gets too  hot to hold. A similar situation, in reverse, would apply to those pore guys who live up north , in those cold dark winter days Half an hour to defrost the windshield..Brrrh!<br />
No one in these discussions seems to use air conditioning in the summer or heat in the winter.Have you any idea how much energy those require, presumably from the same battery pack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anatole Maher</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/#comment-138114</link>
		<dc:creator>Anatole Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1232#comment-138114</guid>
		<description>From the article cited, GM claims the energy consumption for 40 miles in the &#039;electric mode&#039; assume city driving is half the battery capacity, or 8 kwH
I drive an old Honda Civic, 1.5 llire gasoline engine with AT, estimate around 24 mpg city driving using regular gasoline (no alchohol) Checking some data which I;ve long forgotten that works out to around 36 +kwH /24 miles or roughtly 1.5 kwH/mile or 60 kwH for 40 miles
GM specs give the mechanical transmission efficiency at around 0.89 , (45 kW electrical in/40 kW mechanical out) which would correspond to a vehicle energy consumption of 7.1 kwH
Is it possible the efficiency of my vehicle is only 7.1/60 or 12 percent?
I imagine that the control system somehow maintains a constant rpm of the engine/generator combination by reducing the fuel input when the demand  drops.  How does that affect engine efficiency ?(the statement is that the engine runs at constant speed and maximum efficiency)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the article cited, GM claims the energy consumption for 40 miles in the &#8216;electric mode&#8217; assume city driving is half the battery capacity, or 8 kwH<br />
I drive an old Honda Civic, 1.5 llire gasoline engine with AT, estimate around 24 mpg city driving using regular gasoline (no alchohol) Checking some data which I;ve long forgotten that works out to around 36 +kwH /24 miles or roughtly 1.5 kwH/mile or 60 kwH for 40 miles<br />
GM specs give the mechanical transmission efficiency at around 0.89 , (45 kW electrical in/40 kW mechanical out) which would correspond to a vehicle energy consumption of 7.1 kwH<br />
Is it possible the efficiency of my vehicle is only 7.1/60 or 12 percent?<br />
I imagine that the control system somehow maintains a constant rpm of the engine/generator combination by reducing the fuel input when the demand  drops.  How does that affect engine efficiency ?(the statement is that the engine runs at constant speed and maximum efficiency)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anatole Maher</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/#comment-138103</link>
		<dc:creator>Anatole Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1232#comment-138103</guid>
		<description>What happened to the  road resistance and air resistance at 70 mph?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the  road resistance and air resistance at 70 mph?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anatole Maher</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/#comment-138099</link>
		<dc:creator>Anatole Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1232#comment-138099</guid>
		<description>I have been trying to understand some conflicting statements (at least to me)&#039;
I was under the impression that the engine-generator combination runs at a selected constant speed, correspoinding to the maximum efficiency of the engine. Someone stated that the power is used ONLY   to drive the motor, gear and wheels, not to charge the battery Recharging only occurs  by regeneration during braking (deceleration)
From a  usual torque-hp-efficiency vs rpm characteristic of a gasoline engine, the maximum efficiency occurs somewhere around 75 percent of the rpm for maximum hp.... In a straight gasoline./AT  car,( to slow down  if you take your foot off the gas pedal, the engine slows to idle, if the car speed is  still too high you need to brake)
 if the hp demand  decreases below this point the engine slows down to the point where the  engine torque x rpm match the demand..  For the Volt this demand is the power required to drive the wheels reflected back into the drive motor/gearbox  and generator..
From a spec I copied, the Volt engine is a  3cyl.1.0 litre, turbo charged 160hp/120kw  gasoline engine, with &quot;nominal&quot; speed of 1500-1800 rpm, maximum 3200 rpm,,Presumably this nominal speed is the speed for maximum efficiency.at which the engine runs continuously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been trying to understand some conflicting statements (at least to me)&#8217;<br />
I was under the impression that the engine-generator combination runs at a selected constant speed, correspoinding to the maximum efficiency of the engine. Someone stated that the power is used ONLY   to drive the motor, gear and wheels, not to charge the battery Recharging only occurs  by regeneration during braking (deceleration)<br />
From a  usual torque-hp-efficiency vs rpm characteristic of a gasoline engine, the maximum efficiency occurs somewhere around 75 percent of the rpm for maximum hp&#8230;. In a straight gasoline./AT  car,( to slow down  if you take your foot off the gas pedal, the engine slows to idle, if the car speed is  still too high you need to brake)<br />
 if the hp demand  decreases below this point the engine slows down to the point where the  engine torque x rpm match the demand..  For the Volt this demand is the power required to drive the wheels reflected back into the drive motor/gearbox  and generator..<br />
From a spec I copied, the Volt engine is a  3cyl.1.0 litre, turbo charged 160hp/120kw  gasoline engine, with &#8220;nominal&#8221; speed of 1500-1800 rpm, maximum 3200 rpm,,Presumably this nominal speed is the speed for maximum efficiency.at which the engine runs continuously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvain (Quebec, CANADA)</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/#comment-89734</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvain (Quebec, CANADA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1232#comment-89734</guid>
		<description>Here are some ideas for the next VOLT version which is adding some solar cell soft membrane on the top, the trunk and the hood.
 
The ICE generator would be smaller and less polluant using a Bio-Diesel type and finally the Lithium-Ion batteries would be replaced with Dr. Cui newest technology called the Silicon Nanowire Battery which holds 10 times the charge of existing Li-ion battery and will be a lot cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some ideas for the next VOLT version which is adding some solar cell soft membrane on the top, the trunk and the hood.</p>
<p>The ICE generator would be smaller and less polluant using a Bio-Diesel type and finally the Lithium-Ion batteries would be replaced with Dr. Cui newest technology called the Silicon Nanowire Battery which holds 10 times the charge of existing Li-ion battery and will be a lot cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CM</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/#comment-61963</link>
		<dc:creator>CM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1232#comment-61963</guid>
		<description>john1701A, I second your notion that basic information or a FAQ would be most helpful, considering some of the questions and comments that pop up: 

&quot;Okay, this may be a dumb question, but if the depletion point is 30%, then is the all electric range somewhere around 28 miles&quot; A wise man once said &quot;There are no dumb questions, just dumb answers&quot;. From the beginning, the Volt plan was to get about 40 miles of driving from 8 Kwh, or half of the 16 Kwh battery pack. So it still gets 40 EV miles before reaching the depletion point at 30%.  Tests have discovered that for this type of LiIon battery, getting the State of Charge above 85% or below 20% puts stress on the battery and shortens its life. Thats why GM chose the 80% to 30% SOC scheme, it maximizes battery life and reliability.  

&quot;will only a certain segment of the battery pack be charged (to 80%, for example) by the generator to run the wheels, leaving the other plug-in segment of the battery pack at 30% to preserve the life?&quot; No, the entire battery charges and discharges at the same rate and to the same amount. There are even special circuits to keep all the individual cells that make up the battery at the same charge level, making sure no cell in the pack gets fully charged or excessively discharged. Designing it so different parts were at different charge levels would introduce a lot of major headaches for no good reason, and probably cause premature failue of certain parts of the battery pack. 

&quot;Take this scenario. There are three segments of the battery pack. 1. Plug-in only 2. Generator only, 3. Regenerative braking only, only releasing energy once 80% charge is reached. This would reduce the number of charge cycles each battery cell would see. Does anyone see a problem with this scenario?&quot; Major problem. It is unnecessarily complicated, and one of those segments would inevitably get used much more than the others and fail much sooner. Someone who had a short daily commute would wear out the &quot;plug-in only segment&quot; long before the rarely used &quot;generator only segment&quot;. Besides, a single pack can handle all three functions without any problems. 

&quot;Does, for example, every minute charge through regenerative braking or a larger charge resulting from the ICE running have the same effect upon the battery as one that would take the 30% SOC to 80% SOC?&quot; No, two half discharge/charge cycles aren&#039;t the same as two full discharge/charge cycles, in fact, counts for sligtly less than one! Minor charge fluctuations hardly matter at all.  

&quot;Is the generator always directly linked to the wheels or does it only supply power once the CDP is reached?&quot; The generator is directly linked to the IC engine, and produces electrical power when the ICE is running. Electricity powers the motor that drives the wheels, and that electricity can come from the generator and/or the battery. During regenerative braking or when the generator is producing more power than the motor needs, the surplus electricity can go to recharge the battery. 

&quot;Will the Volt dump the generators excess power or will it adjust the generator output to match the cars needs?&quot; Most of the generator output goes directly to the motor powering the wheels, and any excess goes to charge the battery. Once the SOC reaches a sufficiently high level, about 40%, the generator can shut off and the car resumes EV mode driving. But the power output of the IC engine and generator can be increased if necessary, like on the proverbial &quot;going up a steep mountain pass while towing a trailer&quot;, although the fuel economy would drop a bit. 

&quot;I am curious if the generator is A.C. or D.C.&quot; Most likely AC, as varying output frequency really isn&#039;t a problem here, it can easily be rectified to DC, and AC generators are usually brushless and need less maintenance. 

&quot;I think the biggest problem the Volt will have is stale gas..&quot; That problem has already been solved, by the use of a sealed bladder style tank. The problem with gas going bad with age is caused by evaporation of ligher components, oxidation, and contamination, and a bladder tank keeps out air and prevents all of those causes. 

&quot;Sounds interesting, but I heard it’s better for batteries to charge them up, then almost totally deplete them before charging them up again.&quot; That is only true for NiCad batteries, due to a NiCad phenomenon called &quot;memory&quot;. It is NOT TRUE for lead acid, NiMH, or any kind of LiIon battery, and for all of those battery types, deep depletion will shorten their lifespan, and they don&#039;t suffer from the memory effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john1701A, I second your notion that basic information or a FAQ would be most helpful, considering some of the questions and comments that pop up: </p>
<p>&#8220;Okay, this may be a dumb question, but if the depletion point is 30%, then is the all electric range somewhere around 28 miles&#8221; A wise man once said &#8220;There are no dumb questions, just dumb answers&#8221;. From the beginning, the Volt plan was to get about 40 miles of driving from 8 Kwh, or half of the 16 Kwh battery pack. So it still gets 40 EV miles before reaching the depletion point at 30%.  Tests have discovered that for this type of LiIon battery, getting the State of Charge above 85% or below 20% puts stress on the battery and shortens its life. Thats why GM chose the 80% to 30% SOC scheme, it maximizes battery life and reliability.  </p>
<p>&#8220;will only a certain segment of the battery pack be charged (to 80%, for example) by the generator to run the wheels, leaving the other plug-in segment of the battery pack at 30% to preserve the life?&#8221; No, the entire battery charges and discharges at the same rate and to the same amount. There are even special circuits to keep all the individual cells that make up the battery at the same charge level, making sure no cell in the pack gets fully charged or excessively discharged. Designing it so different parts were at different charge levels would introduce a lot of major headaches for no good reason, and probably cause premature failue of certain parts of the battery pack. </p>
<p>&#8220;Take this scenario. There are three segments of the battery pack. 1. Plug-in only 2. Generator only, 3. Regenerative braking only, only releasing energy once 80% charge is reached. This would reduce the number of charge cycles each battery cell would see. Does anyone see a problem with this scenario?&#8221; Major problem. It is unnecessarily complicated, and one of those segments would inevitably get used much more than the others and fail much sooner. Someone who had a short daily commute would wear out the &#8220;plug-in only segment&#8221; long before the rarely used &#8220;generator only segment&#8221;. Besides, a single pack can handle all three functions without any problems. </p>
<p>&#8220;Does, for example, every minute charge through regenerative braking or a larger charge resulting from the ICE running have the same effect upon the battery as one that would take the 30% SOC to 80% SOC?&#8221; No, two half discharge/charge cycles aren&#8217;t the same as two full discharge/charge cycles, in fact, counts for sligtly less than one! Minor charge fluctuations hardly matter at all.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Is the generator always directly linked to the wheels or does it only supply power once the CDP is reached?&#8221; The generator is directly linked to the IC engine, and produces electrical power when the ICE is running. Electricity powers the motor that drives the wheels, and that electricity can come from the generator and/or the battery. During regenerative braking or when the generator is producing more power than the motor needs, the surplus electricity can go to recharge the battery. </p>
<p>&#8220;Will the Volt dump the generators excess power or will it adjust the generator output to match the cars needs?&#8221; Most of the generator output goes directly to the motor powering the wheels, and any excess goes to charge the battery. Once the SOC reaches a sufficiently high level, about 40%, the generator can shut off and the car resumes EV mode driving. But the power output of the IC engine and generator can be increased if necessary, like on the proverbial &#8220;going up a steep mountain pass while towing a trailer&#8221;, although the fuel economy would drop a bit. </p>
<p>&#8220;I am curious if the generator is A.C. or D.C.&#8221; Most likely AC, as varying output frequency really isn&#8217;t a problem here, it can easily be rectified to DC, and AC generators are usually brushless and need less maintenance. </p>
<p>&#8220;I think the biggest problem the Volt will have is stale gas..&#8221; That problem has already been solved, by the use of a sealed bladder style tank. The problem with gas going bad with age is caused by evaporation of ligher components, oxidation, and contamination, and a bladder tank keeps out air and prevents all of those causes. </p>
<p>&#8220;Sounds interesting, but I heard it’s better for batteries to charge them up, then almost totally deplete them before charging them up again.&#8221; That is only true for NiCad batteries, due to a NiCad phenomenon called &#8220;memory&#8221;. It is NOT TRUE for lead acid, NiMH, or any kind of LiIon battery, and for all of those battery types, deep depletion will shorten their lifespan, and they don&#8217;t suffer from the memory effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herm Perez</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/#comment-61901</link>
		<dc:creator>Herm Perez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1232#comment-61901</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Sounds interesting, but I heard it’s better for batteries to charge them up, then almost totally deplete them before charging them up again. So if you got lazy, kept refilling the tank, and just always kept your vehicle at a 30% charge, it might not be so great for the batteries? &gt;&gt;&gt;

This is not so, it actually hurts the battery when you get close to 0%.. it will kill the battery if kept at 0% for a couple of days. Toyota is even more careful with the Prius battery than GM is with the Volt&#039;s.. Edison&#039;s old Nickel-Iron batteries are the only ones (that I know of) that will take any abuse, some are still working after 100 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Sounds interesting, but I heard it’s better for batteries to charge them up, then almost totally deplete them before charging them up again. So if you got lazy, kept refilling the tank, and just always kept your vehicle at a 30% charge, it might not be so great for the batteries? &gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>This is not so, it actually hurts the battery when you get close to 0%.. it will kill the battery if kept at 0% for a couple of days. Toyota is even more careful with the Prius battery than GM is with the Volt&#8217;s.. Edison&#8217;s old Nickel-Iron batteries are the only ones (that I know of) that will take any abuse, some are still working after 100 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mantari Damacy</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/25/what-happens-in-the-chevy-volt-past-the-customer-depletion-point/#comment-61838</link>
		<dc:creator>Mantari Damacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1232#comment-61838</guid>
		<description>If possible, please allow for power-user (off the standard menu) selections. Example: &quot;Once I dip below 30%, aggressively [or mildly] charge my battery back up to full.&quot;  

Also good; allow for an out-of-gas and out-of-battery mode, where a user could deplete past the &quot;I&#039;m empty&quot; 30% mark (perhaps to 10 or 15%) in sort of a limp-in mode to get to a gas station or plug-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If possible, please allow for power-user (off the standard menu) selections. Example: &#8220;Once I dip below 30%, aggressively [or mildly] charge my battery back up to full.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Also good; allow for an out-of-gas and out-of-battery mode, where a user could deplete past the &#8220;I&#8217;m empty&#8221; 30% mark (perhaps to 10 or 15%) in sort of a limp-in mode to get to a gas station or plug-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.396 seconds -->
