<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM&#8217;s Future Volt and E-Flex Plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/16/gms-future-volt-and-e-flex-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/16/gms-future-volt-and-e-flex-plans/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:11:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grizzly</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/16/gms-future-volt-and-e-flex-plans/#comment-60106</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizzly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1227#comment-60106</guid>
		<description>noel #82

&quot;Change every year is nothing new. Think about 1556, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 Chevys, for example.  Similar under the skin, but almost like different cars from the outside. People loved it. The buzz every fall was intense waiting to see what would be new for the following year &quot;

*** *** ***

This is EXACTLY the magic Lutz/Wagoner are trying to recapture.  T&#039;wood be nice to think that every vehicle was &quot;unique&quot; to the core but that&#039;s not a reality.  Platform sharing is here to stay and has yet to hit it&#039;s zenith.  The problem with &quot;publicly held&quot; &quot;accountant run&quot; GM is that it was and IS boring and detrimental.  It&#039;s a crying shame that it took nearly 3 decades of continual market share slide to realize this.

When people call for Wagoner&#039;s sig. below the bottom line they fail to understand that HE is the future and the board agrees.  When you understand GM&#039;s position and it&#039;s problems you can only subscribe to one camp, the short run or the long.  The former would/could possibly have produced some more favorable recent income stmts but it&#039;s all about the future.  Sometimes you&#039;ve just got to believe and really believe that red ink will flow before you&#039;re BACK in BLACK.  NO car company has a better/greener future plan than GM.  Dig deep and hang on, it&#039;s a matter of courage and staying the course!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noel #82</p>
<p>&#8220;Change every year is nothing new. Think about 1556, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 Chevys, for example.  Similar under the skin, but almost like different cars from the outside. People loved it. The buzz every fall was intense waiting to see what would be new for the following year &#8221;</p>
<p>*** *** ***</p>
<p>This is EXACTLY the magic Lutz/Wagoner are trying to recapture.  T&#8217;wood be nice to think that every vehicle was &#8220;unique&#8221; to the core but that&#8217;s not a reality.  Platform sharing is here to stay and has yet to hit it&#8217;s zenith.  The problem with &#8220;publicly held&#8221; &#8220;accountant run&#8221; GM is that it was and IS boring and detrimental.  It&#8217;s a crying shame that it took nearly 3 decades of continual market share slide to realize this.</p>
<p>When people call for Wagoner&#8217;s sig. below the bottom line they fail to understand that HE is the future and the board agrees.  When you understand GM&#8217;s position and it&#8217;s problems you can only subscribe to one camp, the short run or the long.  The former would/could possibly have produced some more favorable recent income stmts but it&#8217;s all about the future.  Sometimes you&#8217;ve just got to believe and really believe that red ink will flow before you&#8217;re BACK in BLACK.  NO car company has a better/greener future plan than GM.  Dig deep and hang on, it&#8217;s a matter of courage and staying the course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tagamet</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/16/gms-future-volt-and-e-flex-plans/#comment-60090</link>
		<dc:creator>Tagamet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1227#comment-60090</guid>
		<description>noel@82
Did Columbus discover cars over here? 1556 is a loooong time ago (g)
Be well and proofread(wink)
Tag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noel@82<br />
Did Columbus discover cars over here? 1556 is a loooong time ago (g)<br />
Be well and proofread(wink)<br />
Tag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noel park</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/16/gms-future-volt-and-e-flex-plans/#comment-60030</link>
		<dc:creator>noel park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1227#comment-60030</guid>
		<description>Change every year is nothing new.  Think about 1556, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 Chevys, for example.  Similar under the skin, but almost like different cars from the outside.  People loved it.  The buzz every fall was intense waiting to see what would be new for the following year.

The 63-67 Corvettes look very similar from the outside, but evolved every year under the skin.  Disc brakes, big block engines, and many small upgrades as opportunities and/or problems arose.

Our 1917 Chevrolet had thermosyphon cooling.  The 1918 introduced a proper water pump system.  A huge one-up on the Model T.  Any proper racing Model T had an aftermarket water pump.

While body styles stay similar longer now, the technical upgrades continue year by year.  The Volt will only follow in a tradition as old as the automobile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change every year is nothing new.  Think about 1556, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 Chevys, for example.  Similar under the skin, but almost like different cars from the outside.  People loved it.  The buzz every fall was intense waiting to see what would be new for the following year.</p>
<p>The 63-67 Corvettes look very similar from the outside, but evolved every year under the skin.  Disc brakes, big block engines, and many small upgrades as opportunities and/or problems arose.</p>
<p>Our 1917 Chevrolet had thermosyphon cooling.  The 1918 introduced a proper water pump system.  A huge one-up on the Model T.  Any proper racing Model T had an aftermarket water pump.</p>
<p>While body styles stay similar longer now, the technical upgrades continue year by year.  The Volt will only follow in a tradition as old as the automobile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talks</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/16/gms-future-volt-and-e-flex-plans/#comment-59989</link>
		<dc:creator>Talks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1227#comment-59989</guid>
		<description>I think the below would be the major improvements to reduce cost and/or increase performance.

1) Use 10KWH battery instead of 16kWH and extend the SOC operation to around 15 - 95% (8Kwh) by using ultracapacitors to compensate for low amps at extreme SOCs. If the 16kwh battery cost
is 10000$ then they can easily reduce the cost by 3000$ for 10kwh battery with ultracaps cost included.

2) Enhanced Electric Motor.

3) Enhanced HVAC.

4) Low Power Wipers and Stereo.

5) High efficient power electronics.

6) Improved ICE efficiency. May be 1.0L four cylinder with direct injection ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the below would be the major improvements to reduce cost and/or increase performance.</p>
<p>1) Use 10KWH battery instead of 16kWH and extend the SOC operation to around 15 &#8211; 95% (8Kwh) by using ultracapacitors to compensate for low amps at extreme SOCs. If the 16kwh battery cost<br />
is 10000$ then they can easily reduce the cost by 3000$ for 10kwh battery with ultracaps cost included.</p>
<p>2) Enhanced Electric Motor.</p>
<p>3) Enhanced HVAC.</p>
<p>4) Low Power Wipers and Stereo.</p>
<p>5) High efficient power electronics.</p>
<p>6) Improved ICE efficiency. May be 1.0L four cylinder with direct injection ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tagamet</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/16/gms-future-volt-and-e-flex-plans/#comment-59955</link>
		<dc:creator>Tagamet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1227#comment-59955</guid>
		<description>Jim@78
Even with my both shoes off, I ran out of digits upon which to count, so I &quot;rounded up&quot;.
A) I like your math &lt;b&gt;much&lt;/b&gt; better (do you have a calculator)?
B) I&#039;ll stick to my theory that the Volt will come out 6 months before predicted, so subtract 6 from your total and it seems like it&#039;s just around the corner!
Thanks and be well,
Tag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim@78<br />
Even with my both shoes off, I ran out of digits upon which to count, so I &#8220;rounded up&#8221;.<br />
A) I like your math <b>much</b> better (do you have a calculator)?<br />
B) I&#8217;ll stick to my theory that the Volt will come out 6 months before predicted, so subtract 6 from your total and it seems like it&#8217;s just around the corner!<br />
Thanks and be well,<br />
Tag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 401/405 objects using apc

Served from: gm-volt.com @ 2012-02-13 02:33:19 -->
