Comments on: Video: GM Airs Chevy Volt Ad During the Olympics http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/11/video-gm-airs-chevy-volt-ad-during-the-olympics/ Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:11:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Lee Davis http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/11/video-gm-airs-chevy-volt-ad-during-the-olympics/#comment-77962 Lee Davis Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:32:53 +0000 http://gm-volt.com/?p=1213#comment-77962 CLEO AWARD!! This is the best commercial I have ver seen. iT'S GOT TO WIN A CLEO. CLEO AWARD!! This is the best commercial I have ver seen. iT’S GOT TO WIN A CLEO.

]]> By: kathy http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/11/video-gm-airs-chevy-volt-ad-during-the-olympics/#comment-71648 kathy Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:20:12 +0000 http://gm-volt.com/?p=1213#comment-71648 I LOVE this commercial! I can watch it over and over. The music goes so well with the visual and the visual is tremendous! I LOVE this commercial! I can watch it over and over. The music goes so well with the visual and the visual is tremendous!

]]> By: Mark http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/11/video-gm-airs-chevy-volt-ad-during-the-olympics/#comment-60118 Mark Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:14:47 +0000 http://gm-volt.com/?p=1213#comment-60118 "Safety is/was a concern with Lithium, and you want to use a more reactive material? Why don’t we just use Francium while we’re at it ;)" The latest Lithium chemistry LiFePO4 is completely safe. It also has a very high cycle lifetime of at least 2000. “Safety is/was a concern with Lithium, and you want to use a more reactive material?
Why don’t we just use Francium while we’re at it ;) ”

The latest Lithium chemistry LiFePO4 is completely safe. It also has a very high cycle lifetime of at least 2000.

]]> By: Grizzly http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/11/video-gm-airs-chevy-volt-ad-during-the-olympics/#comment-60117 Grizzly Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:11:11 +0000 http://gm-volt.com/?p=1213#comment-60117 mark says #130 "Is the Volt a serial hybrid?" *** *** *** Be very careful. The Volt and any other RE EV is/are not hybrids at all. Hybrids can save fuel, but as a country our path to energy independence WILL center upon RE electric vehicles, not "hybrids", and rest assured the distinction is *NOT* small. mark says #130

“Is the Volt a serial hybrid?”

*** *** ***
Be very careful. The Volt and any other RE EV is/are not hybrids at all.
Hybrids can save fuel, but as a country our path to energy independence WILL center upon RE electric vehicles, not “hybrids”, and rest assured the distinction is *NOT* small.

]]> By: Mark http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/11/video-gm-airs-chevy-volt-ad-during-the-olympics/#comment-60114 Mark Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:06:35 +0000 http://gm-volt.com/?p=1213#comment-60114 I’m tired of the talk about hybrids. I want a pure battery electric car, but I don’t think we will see one built by the car companies we grew up with. Who does not want EV’s in our driveways: -Legacy Automakers, because they, and their dealer networks do not earn enough revenue by selling cars. A look at how large their service departments are (and our out-of-wallet experience with them) shows what’s at stake revenue-wise because EV’s never need service beyond tire changes. EV’s don’t even need brake jobs due to electronic regenerative braking that does most of the work. Their ordinary friction brake pads and rotors thus last the life of the car (as shown on the Toyota electric Rav4). The large established car companies depend on their service department, like printer companies depend on sales of ink cartridges. So why did Toyota sell the Rav4 instead of leasing and crushing as GM did with the EV1? It’s a mystery, but I came across a blog that mentioned that a Toyota exec at a public speech mistakenly said that the cars would be sold, and so to save face, Toyota reluctantly sold the Rav4. Buyers, however, now post on blogs that they actually had difficulty in getting the Toyota dealer to sell them an electric Rav4 and that they were highly pressured to instead buy a Gas Toyota or a Prius. -Oil companies, for obvious reasons. Note they are also major stockholders in auto companies and thus probably have influence over their board of directors. Business firms exist to make profits, but profits are going to be reduced if EV’s replace the ICE car. Much of our economy is based on the automobile, and its upkeep. Almost every business is related in some way to the car. What will happen to employment if the need to service a car is practically eliminated? What happens to Midas, Pepboys, Kragen’s, smog check, AMCO, gas stations, Jiffylube, general service repair centers, the manufacturing plants that fabricate repair parts, the UPS people that deliver the parts, the corner deli or Taco Bells frequented by those firm’s workers at lunchtime? What about government agencies that depend on collecting all manner of tax revenue from the above interlinked economy? If people understand this scenario, then they will understand why they can’t yet buy an EV from the legacy business infrastructure. Only recently can one sniff the scent of a potential EV from start-up EV manufacturers like Tesla (too costly for mass production partly because they hand-solder a battery pack of 6000 Lithium AA sized cells together in series-parallel groups), Aptera, and even the tiny BugE, etc., because a startup company does not need to address the risk that a service-free vehicle will parasitically affect revenue from other parts of its company. And startups probably are not in business relations with oil companies either. One interesting emerging EV contender is the Chinese and their unstoppable manufacturing base. Google the “Miles EV” and “Thunder Sky” Lithium battery (which can replace the suppressed NiMH battery. Google “95 AH Large Format NiMH battery” to see that a 30 million dollar lawsuit dismantled the Panasonic plant that built these batteries that gave the Toyota Rav4 EV more than 100 miles of highway speed range- 10 years ago). The Chinese don’t have any obligations to any western business or oil cartel. Although they are importing oil at increasing rates, I think they are taking steps to limit dependency on oil by mass producing EVs. A $4000 Lithium powered highway speed scooter motorcycle just appeared from China: the “XM-3500Li” You can buy it now online. Curiously, Nissan’s CEO has advocated a pure EV but I have a hard time believing he really will build one and that the announcement is mostly PR “green washing” in nature. After all, Nissan has service centers, too. I’m tired of the talk about hybrids. I want a pure battery electric car, but I don’t think we will see one built by the car companies we grew up with.
Who does not want EV’s in our driveways:
-Legacy Automakers, because they, and their dealer networks do not earn enough revenue by selling cars. A look at how large their service departments are (and our out-of-wallet experience with them) shows what’s at stake revenue-wise because EV’s never need service beyond tire changes. EV’s don’t even need brake jobs due to electronic regenerative braking that does most of the work. Their ordinary friction brake pads and rotors thus last the life of the car (as shown on the Toyota electric Rav4).
The large established car companies depend on their service department, like printer companies depend on sales of ink cartridges. So why did Toyota sell the Rav4 instead of leasing and crushing as GM did with the EV1? It’s a mystery, but I came across a blog that mentioned that a Toyota exec at a public speech mistakenly said that the cars would be sold, and so to save face, Toyota reluctantly sold the Rav4. Buyers, however, now post on blogs that they actually had difficulty in getting the Toyota dealer to sell them an electric Rav4 and that they were highly pressured to instead buy a Gas Toyota or a Prius.
-Oil companies, for obvious reasons. Note they are also major stockholders in auto companies and thus probably have influence over their board of directors.
Business firms exist to make profits, but profits are going to be reduced if EV’s replace the ICE car. Much of our economy is based on the automobile, and its upkeep. Almost every business is related in some way to the car. What will happen to employment if the need to service a car is practically eliminated?
What happens to Midas, Pepboys, Kragen’s, smog check, AMCO, gas stations, Jiffylube, general service repair centers, the manufacturing plants that fabricate repair parts, the UPS people that deliver the parts, the corner deli or Taco Bells frequented by those firm’s workers at lunchtime? What about government agencies that depend on collecting all manner of tax revenue from the above interlinked economy?
If people understand this scenario, then they will understand why they can’t yet buy an EV from the legacy business infrastructure. Only recently can one sniff the scent of a potential EV from start-up EV manufacturers like Tesla (too costly for mass production partly because they hand-solder a battery pack of 6000 Lithium AA sized cells together in series-parallel groups), Aptera, and even the tiny BugE, etc., because a startup company does not need to address the risk that a service-free vehicle will parasitically affect revenue from other parts of its company. And startups probably are not in business relations with oil companies either. One interesting emerging EV contender is the Chinese and their unstoppable manufacturing base. Google the “Miles EV” and “Thunder Sky” Lithium battery (which can replace the suppressed NiMH battery. Google “95 AH Large Format NiMH battery” to see that a 30 million dollar lawsuit dismantled the Panasonic plant that built these batteries that gave the Toyota Rav4 EV more than 100 miles of highway speed range- 10 years ago). The Chinese don’t have any obligations to any western business or oil cartel. Although they are importing oil at increasing rates, I think they are taking steps to limit dependency on oil by mass producing EVs. A $4000 Lithium powered highway speed scooter motorcycle just appeared from China: the “XM-3500Li” You can buy it now online.
Curiously, Nissan’s CEO has advocated a pure EV but I have a hard time believing he really will build one and that the announcement is mostly PR “green washing” in nature. After all, Nissan has service centers, too.

]]>