<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM May Share the Volt Powertrain With Ford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:32:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/#comment-58136</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/#comment-58136</guid>
		<description>Ford really does not need GM, the Volvo electric drive train is the way forward. In wheel electric/brake motors, not an inboard electric motor and drive train. If the drive shafts, brake rotors/hubs and all the hydrolics are dumped, then the wheel weight is within 5lbs. The only mechanical brake are the emergency/parking brakes.  This means all control is electronic, cheaper, simpler, lighter. The leader in, in wheel motors is PML Flightlink, a UK company, their best motor produces 120kilowatts/700nm of torque (about 150hp)  The hybrid Volvo C30 is based around a version of these motors. They have a demo car based on the BMW mini that is mouthwatering.

Spec 150mph top, 0-60 4.5sec, 21Kw battery, 15Kw genset under trunk floor 400 miles on battery, 900 miles combined 80mpg.
No impact on carrying capacity 200kg heaver than standard car.
Total power 480kw 2800nm torque, 

Zapp and several others are going down this route, so the Volt is out of date before it even hits the streets and there is better battery technology than A123 coming down the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford really does not need GM, the Volvo electric drive train is the way forward. In wheel electric/brake motors, not an inboard electric motor and drive train. If the drive shafts, brake rotors/hubs and all the hydrolics are dumped, then the wheel weight is within 5lbs. The only mechanical brake are the emergency/parking brakes.  This means all control is electronic, cheaper, simpler, lighter. The leader in, in wheel motors is PML Flightlink, a UK company, their best motor produces 120kilowatts/700nm of torque (about 150hp)  The hybrid Volvo C30 is based around a version of these motors. They have a demo car based on the BMW mini that is mouthwatering.</p>
<p>Spec 150mph top, 0-60 4.5sec, 21Kw battery, 15Kw genset under trunk floor 400 miles on battery, 900 miles combined 80mpg.<br />
No impact on carrying capacity 200kg heaver than standard car.<br />
Total power 480kw 2800nm torque, </p>
<p>Zapp and several others are going down this route, so the Volt is out of date before it even hits the streets and there is better battery technology than A123 coming down the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grizzly</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/#comment-57739</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizzly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/#comment-57739</guid>
		<description>Toyoda #54

&quot;I totally agree about Japan. In fact former Toyota employees are in many influential position within Japan Government. Over there the Corporations and Government are totally intertwined. Basically, it is one giant Good’ol Boy network with everbody washing each other’s back. Not exactly fair competition.&quot;

*** *** ***

I&#039;ve been trying to make this point for quite some time.  It&#039;s amazing to hear all who bellyache about Uncle Sam helping out GM in a time of need when whatever they get would pale compared to what the Japanese Govt has given to their companies like Toyota over the years.  Remember also that it&#039;s not as though their market has ever been open to GM, Ford, and Chrysler.  They&#039;ve had pretty much a free ride, yet you hear the stupidity of the left on just how great Toyota is.

Free trade is a good thing, but it&#039;s got to be reciprocal.  Japan has always been set on protecting it&#039;s market from foreign competition and making absolute sure that it&#039;s companies forsake profits for market share (domination).  This is not in dispute, and it never hurt their efforts that our congress is largely &quot;For Sale&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toyoda #54</p>
<p>&#8220;I totally agree about Japan. In fact former Toyota employees are in many influential position within Japan Government. Over there the Corporations and Government are totally intertwined. Basically, it is one giant Good’ol Boy network with everbody washing each other’s back. Not exactly fair competition.&#8221;</p>
<p>*** *** ***</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to make this point for quite some time.  It&#8217;s amazing to hear all who bellyache about Uncle Sam helping out GM in a time of need when whatever they get would pale compared to what the Japanese Govt has given to their companies like Toyota over the years.  Remember also that it&#8217;s not as though their market has ever been open to GM, Ford, and Chrysler.  They&#8217;ve had pretty much a free ride, yet you hear the stupidity of the left on just how great Toyota is.</p>
<p>Free trade is a good thing, but it&#8217;s got to be reciprocal.  Japan has always been set on protecting it&#8217;s market from foreign competition and making absolute sure that it&#8217;s companies forsake profits for market share (domination).  This is not in dispute, and it never hurt their efforts that our congress is largely &#8220;For Sale&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/#comment-57442</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/#comment-57442</guid>
		<description>#54 
&quot;I totally agree about Japan. In fact former Toyota employees are in many influential position within Japan Government. Over there the Corporations and Government are totally intertwined. Basically, it is one giant Good’ol Boy network with everbody washing each other’s back. Not exactly fair competition.&quot;

It&#039;s not like that could ever happen in America.  Rice, Bush, Cheney were never involved in private companies and even if they were they wouldn&#039;t be helping those companies reap record profits.  No sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#54<br />
&#8220;I totally agree about Japan. In fact former Toyota employees are in many influential position within Japan Government. Over there the Corporations and Government are totally intertwined. Basically, it is one giant Good’ol Boy network with everbody washing each other’s back. Not exactly fair competition.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like that could ever happen in America.  Rice, Bush, Cheney were never involved in private companies and even if they were they wouldn&#8217;t be helping those companies reap record profits.  No sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Mbongo</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/#comment-57410</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Mbongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/#comment-57410</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t get it. 
After all the criticisms GM has endured since the very first day they announced plan to built Chevy Volt, now they want to have a part of it? Who&#039;s going to be the next: is you Toyota? Honda? Chrysler? or Nissan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t get it.<br />
After all the criticisms GM has endured since the very first day they announced plan to built Chevy Volt, now they want to have a part of it? Who&#8217;s going to be the next: is you Toyota? Honda? Chrysler? or Nissan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe OBrien</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/#comment-57331</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe OBrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/2008/08/04/gm-may-share-the-volt-powertrain-with-ford/#comment-57331</guid>
		<description>Excellent News</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent News</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 405/405 objects using apc

Served from: gm-volt.com @ 2012-05-25 09:33:21 -->
