<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING: Has LG Chem/Compact Power Been Chosen to Supply the Chevy Volt Battery Pack?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:07:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tagamet</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/#comment-45046</link>
		<dc:creator>Tagamet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1106#comment-45046</guid>
		<description>Leon@113

I agree that the for at least first few years, the Volt will &quot;sell out&quot;. I&#039;d love to know, however, about &quot;THE LIST&quot; you mention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leon@113</p>
<p>I agree that the for at least first few years, the Volt will &#8220;sell out&#8221;. I&#8217;d love to know, however, about &#8220;THE LIST&#8221; you mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BestTimesNow</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/#comment-44994</link>
		<dc:creator>BestTimesNow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1106#comment-44994</guid>
		<description>I doubt it&#039;s been awarded,  ready to suppy, is not the same as, we have an order.  

LG Chem was up 3.5% overnight, on the speculation of the news.

http://in.reuters.com/money/quotes/quote?symbol=051910.KS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it&#8217;s been awarded,  ready to suppy, is not the same as, we have an order.  </p>
<p>LG Chem was up 3.5% overnight, on the speculation of the news.</p>
<p><a href="http://in.reuters.com/money/quotes/quote?symbol=051910.KS" rel="nofollow">http://in.reuters.com/money/quotes/quote?symbol=051910.KS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce g</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/#comment-44989</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1106#comment-44989</guid>
		<description>LG Chem is mostly owned by an investment bank I believe.
Hard to know who owns the balance.
LG?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LG Chem is mostly owned by an investment bank I believe.<br />
Hard to know who owns the balance.<br />
LG?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/#comment-44983</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 06:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1106#comment-44983</guid>
		<description>I still think that it is going to be A123. Their Partner Continental AG has stated work on a battery / ultracap unit. Combined with the recent hints of GM looking at using ultracaps it makes me think that the Volt will have them....

&quot;Maxwell announced last month that Continental AG, one of the world’s leading automotive electronics and mechatronics suppliers, has designed BOOSTCAP ultracapacitors into a major automaker’s electrical system stabilization system that is expected to go into full-scale production in the second half of 2009 for a 2010 model. Last year, the company announced
ultracapacitor supply relationships with Valeo, another leading global Tier 1 automotive supplier, and Mercedes Car Group, for their respective hybrid auto development programs.&quot;


http://www.maxwell.com/news-events/release.asp?PRID=263</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think that it is going to be A123. Their Partner Continental AG has stated work on a battery / ultracap unit. Combined with the recent hints of GM looking at using ultracaps it makes me think that the Volt will have them&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Maxwell announced last month that Continental AG, one of the world’s leading automotive electronics and mechatronics suppliers, has designed BOOSTCAP ultracapacitors into a major automaker’s electrical system stabilization system that is expected to go into full-scale production in the second half of 2009 for a 2010 model. Last year, the company announced<br />
ultracapacitor supply relationships with Valeo, another leading global Tier 1 automotive supplier, and Mercedes Car Group, for their respective hybrid auto development programs.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.maxwell.com/news-events/release.asp?PRID=263" rel="nofollow">http://www.maxwell.com/news-events/release.asp?PRID=263</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/#comment-44981</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1106#comment-44981</guid>
		<description>Yes, first year Volt will be between $40-$43k, with 10,000 already sold. Almost nobody on this forum will be buying one. THE LIST is already set for the first year. The second year, when volume kicks in, price should be lower. The big unknown is how much DEALER MARKUP will GM allow ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, first year Volt will be between $40-$43k, with 10,000 already sold. Almost nobody on this forum will be buying one. THE LIST is already set for the first year. The second year, when volume kicks in, price should be lower. The big unknown is how much DEALER MARKUP will GM allow ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BestTimesNow</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/#comment-44975</link>
		<dc:creator>BestTimesNow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 04:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1106#comment-44975</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ready to supply&quot; is not the same as &quot;we have received a PO&quot;, but anyway LG Chem is higher on the news.  FWIW

http://in.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idINSEO17955220080609

http://in.reuters.com/money/quotes/quote?symbol=051910.KS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ready to supply&#8221; is not the same as &#8220;we have received a PO&#8221;, but anyway LG Chem is higher on the news.  FWIW</p>
<p><a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idINSEO17955220080609" rel="nofollow">http://in.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idINSEO17955220080609</a></p>
<p><a href="http://in.reuters.com/money/quotes/quote?symbol=051910.KS" rel="nofollow">http://in.reuters.com/money/quotes/quote?symbol=051910.KS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveP</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/#comment-44972</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1106#comment-44972</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that A123&#039;s lateness to deliver the battery is as much an indicator of problems with their management or battery technology as it is a result of the fact that they started the project with Cobasys.  Probably seemed a good idea since Cobasys had so many ties with GM.  However, something clearly went wrong and A123 wound up with Continental. I speculate Cobasys probably proved unable to do the job in a quality manner, seeing as how they&#039;ve had so much trouble doing NiMH battery packs for which they own all the technology.
I would imagine that alone would make GM kind of nervous.

As for leasing...  I&#039;ve said it before, I&#039;ll say it again, there is no way in Hades I&#039;ll lease an electric car from GM!!  But the battery...  Hmmm... I might be willing to lease the battery...
Things to consider:
Being able to get out of the lease.  I know there&#039;s going to be at least one other vendor who knows how to make the battery pack which might be willing to sell them to the public! :)  Having leases people can get out of will be necessary if there&#039;s going to be a market for alternate batteries.
Will GM publish the interface specification for the battery pack?  If they truly want to just sell the cars and make the batteries standard items like, well, car batteries, then that would be a good indicator of their intentions.
And there&#039;d better be a purchase option at the end of the lease.
If that is true, then you can just add the total lease cost to the cost of the car and there&#039;s your real price for the car, it&#039;s not really a big deal in that case.

I guess it all depends on the terms of that lease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that A123&#8217;s lateness to deliver the battery is as much an indicator of problems with their management or battery technology as it is a result of the fact that they started the project with Cobasys.  Probably seemed a good idea since Cobasys had so many ties with GM.  However, something clearly went wrong and A123 wound up with Continental. I speculate Cobasys probably proved unable to do the job in a quality manner, seeing as how they&#8217;ve had so much trouble doing NiMH battery packs for which they own all the technology.<br />
I would imagine that alone would make GM kind of nervous.</p>
<p>As for leasing&#8230;  I&#8217;ve said it before, I&#8217;ll say it again, there is no way in Hades I&#8217;ll lease an electric car from GM!!  But the battery&#8230;  Hmmm&#8230; I might be willing to lease the battery&#8230;<br />
Things to consider:<br />
Being able to get out of the lease.  I know there&#8217;s going to be at least one other vendor who knows how to make the battery pack which might be willing to sell them to the public! <img src='http://gm-volt.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Having leases people can get out of will be necessary if there&#8217;s going to be a market for alternate batteries.<br />
Will GM publish the interface specification for the battery pack?  If they truly want to just sell the cars and make the batteries standard items like, well, car batteries, then that would be a good indicator of their intentions.<br />
And there&#8217;d better be a purchase option at the end of the lease.<br />
If that is true, then you can just add the total lease cost to the cost of the car and there&#8217;s your real price for the car, it&#8217;s not really a big deal in that case.</p>
<p>I guess it all depends on the terms of that lease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grizzly</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/#comment-44967</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizzly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 02:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1106#comment-44967</guid>
		<description>Koz  #109

The difference is Raw Materials (RM), and nothing better to halt or threaten production than this.   I&#039;ve stated before that cells produced in S. Korea can be counted on much more than China.  Sorry, but the facts are what they are.   So when I hear Lutz say &quot;there is less risk with  one company&quot; I can&#039;t help but think that this is exactly what we&#039;re talking about for the initial release.  Note he didn&#039;t say less risk with &quot;one pack&quot; or &quot;one chemistry&quot;, he said &quot;one company&quot;.

Regardless,  GM will make the RIGHT decisions and the Volt will be a success!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Koz  #109</p>
<p>The difference is Raw Materials (RM), and nothing better to halt or threaten production than this.   I&#8217;ve stated before that cells produced in S. Korea can be counted on much more than China.  Sorry, but the facts are what they are.   So when I hear Lutz say &#8220;there is less risk with  one company&#8221; I can&#8217;t help but think that this is exactly what we&#8217;re talking about for the initial release.  Note he didn&#8217;t say less risk with &#8220;one pack&#8221; or &#8220;one chemistry&#8221;, he said &#8220;one company&#8221;.</p>
<p>Regardless,  GM will make the RIGHT decisions and the Volt will be a success!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koz</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/#comment-44962</link>
		<dc:creator>Koz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 02:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1106#comment-44962</guid>
		<description>Grizzly,

I don&#039;t necessarily disagree since LG is a behemoth compared to A123, but Conti is just as large is comparison to CPI. A123 does have proven production and their chemistry is proven in the market, plus GE and other deep pockets are investers. I don&#039;t think they will have problems meeting the production and GM folks at Voltnation expressed extreme confidence this would not be an issue.

Either way, were just speculating at this point and time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grizzly,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily disagree since LG is a behemoth compared to A123, but Conti is just as large is comparison to CPI. A123 does have proven production and their chemistry is proven in the market, plus GE and other deep pockets are investers. I don&#8217;t think they will have problems meeting the production and GM folks at Voltnation expressed extreme confidence this would not be an issue.</p>
<p>Either way, were just speculating at this point and time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koz</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/06/06/breaking-has-lg-chemcompact-power-been-chosen-to-supply-the-chevy-volt-battery-pack/#comment-44961</link>
		<dc:creator>Koz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1106#comment-44961</guid>
		<description>&quot;To summarize: LG Chem/CPI ...&quot;

Should have been &quot;To summarize my GUESS: LG Chem/CPI...&quot;

Where is the EDIT button everybody is praising?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;To summarize: LG Chem/CPI &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Should have been &#8220;To summarize my GUESS: LG Chem/CPI&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Where is the EDIT button everybody is praising?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.390 seconds -->
