<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM and Toyota May be in Talks to Build Priuses Together and is Toyota Really Looking at E-REVs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2008/05/31/gm-and-toyota-may-be-in-talks-to-build-priuses-together-and-is-toyota-really-looking-at-e-revs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/05/31/gm-and-toyota-may-be-in-talks-to-build-priuses-together-and-is-toyota-really-looking-at-e-revs/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lynch</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/05/31/gm-and-toyota-may-be-in-talks-to-build-priuses-together-and-is-toyota-really-looking-at-e-revs/#comment-48681</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1092#comment-48681</guid>
		<description>In July 2007 a Democratic Presidential Candidate [who was banned from the debates because of his Top Ten List] invented the national contest for better electric rechargable car batteries at http://www.franklynch.org/plug_in_cars.htm 
that John McCain recently announced as though he thought of it.

Obama is so stupid that he failed to make fun of McCain for beings so lacking in ideas that he has to steal ideas from Democrats, and Obama is even dumber for failing to exploit the ideas of his fellow Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In July 2007 a Democratic Presidential Candidate [who was banned from the debates because of his Top Ten List] invented the national contest for better electric rechargable car batteries at <a href="http://www.franklynch.org/plug_in_cars.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.franklynch.org/plug_in_cars.htm</a><br />
that John McCain recently announced as though he thought of it.</p>
<p>Obama is so stupid that he failed to make fun of McCain for beings so lacking in ideas that he has to steal ideas from Democrats, and Obama is even dumber for failing to exploit the ideas of his fellow Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason The Saj</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/05/31/gm-and-toyota-may-be-in-talks-to-build-priuses-together-and-is-toyota-really-looking-at-e-revs/#comment-43976</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason The Saj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1092#comment-43976</guid>
		<description>Everyone is forgetting a key aspect of GM building Prius&#039; for Toyota under contract.

&quot;Workforce Labor negotiations with unions.&quot;

You see, Unions hate losing workers, but the fact is GM needs to shut-down. So Unions will dig in harder and cost GM more. But if GM can say, &quot;We&#039;ve arranged to have xx,xxx number of workers build Prius&#039; under contract at such and such factory. They&#039;ll have to relocate, etc.

But this can be a major bargaining tool for GM in union negotiations. While maintaining a trained workforce which you&#039;d otherwise have to let go, or even buy-off.

***
I could pay every worker $11,000 lay-off bonus. Or have them build Prius&#039; for Toyota.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is forgetting a key aspect of GM building Prius&#8217; for Toyota under contract.</p>
<p>&#8220;Workforce Labor negotiations with unions.&#8221;</p>
<p>You see, Unions hate losing workers, but the fact is GM needs to shut-down. So Unions will dig in harder and cost GM more. But if GM can say, &#8220;We&#8217;ve arranged to have xx,xxx number of workers build Prius&#8217; under contract at such and such factory. They&#8217;ll have to relocate, etc.</p>
<p>But this can be a major bargaining tool for GM in union negotiations. While maintaining a trained workforce which you&#8217;d otherwise have to let go, or even buy-off.</p>
<p>***<br />
I could pay every worker $11,000 lay-off bonus. Or have them build Prius&#8217; for Toyota.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Practical Pete</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/05/31/gm-and-toyota-may-be-in-talks-to-build-priuses-together-and-is-toyota-really-looking-at-e-revs/#comment-43714</link>
		<dc:creator>Practical Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1092#comment-43714</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion folks but it has missed a very major point (and if you&#039;re a marketing student instead of an engineer you may better appreciate this).

Prius has been out for 10 years and is quite popular as the poster-child-car of the better-fuel-efficiency / lower emissions/ alternative fuel movement (i.e. green cars). Whatever you think of Toyota, it really is immaterial to the argument. They and Honda led the pack in taking on considerable risk to market hybrid vehicles to a very fickle American consumer market.  They are successful by any standard - but especially in name recognitiion and acceptance.

I too would love to see Chevy Volts on the road, but at this point it is NOT a better car than the Prius because it does not exist (as far as the consumer is concerned)!  The public needs a fuel efficient car *today* as gasoline prices climb over $4.00 a gallon.  The Volt is still a &quot;vapor&quot; car; the Hybrids have been available for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion folks but it has missed a very major point (and if you&#8217;re a marketing student instead of an engineer you may better appreciate this).</p>
<p>Prius has been out for 10 years and is quite popular as the poster-child-car of the better-fuel-efficiency / lower emissions/ alternative fuel movement (i.e. green cars). Whatever you think of Toyota, it really is immaterial to the argument. They and Honda led the pack in taking on considerable risk to market hybrid vehicles to a very fickle American consumer market.  They are successful by any standard &#8211; but especially in name recognitiion and acceptance.</p>
<p>I too would love to see Chevy Volts on the road, but at this point it is NOT a better car than the Prius because it does not exist (as far as the consumer is concerned)!  The public needs a fuel efficient car *today* as gasoline prices climb over $4.00 a gallon.  The Volt is still a &#8220;vapor&#8221; car; the Hybrids have been available for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill H.</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/05/31/gm-and-toyota-may-be-in-talks-to-build-priuses-together-and-is-toyota-really-looking-at-e-revs/#comment-43711</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1092#comment-43711</guid>
		<description>A wise president who had the interesy of the nation at heart could indeed make a patriotic appeal to a patent-clenching, selfish company. 

 It is hardly the express role of the President of the U.S.A. to set the price of steel, yet JFK appealed to steel companies to lower their prices for the good of the nation. &quot;jawboning&quot; &quot;using his Bully pulpit&quot; 

I can&#039;t say I understand the Cobasys/Chevron versus Panasonic/Toyota situation as well as I would like to...I&#039;m quite willing to entertain the possibility that it is as TED describes it.  If so, I guess the prize for Chevron was the sale of lots and lots of gasoline that was burned inefficiently. and not so many batteries.

What if Whale Oil &#039;R&#039; Us had patented the tungsten light bulb?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wise president who had the interesy of the nation at heart could indeed make a patriotic appeal to a patent-clenching, selfish company. </p>
<p> It is hardly the express role of the President of the U.S.A. to set the price of steel, yet JFK appealed to steel companies to lower their prices for the good of the nation. &#8220;jawboning&#8221; &#8220;using his Bully pulpit&#8221; </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say I understand the Cobasys/Chevron versus Panasonic/Toyota situation as well as I would like to&#8230;I&#8217;m quite willing to entertain the possibility that it is as TED describes it.  If so, I guess the prize for Chevron was the sale of lots and lots of gasoline that was burned inefficiently. and not so many batteries.</p>
<p>What if Whale Oil &#8216;R&#8217; Us had patented the tungsten light bulb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grizzly</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/05/31/gm-and-toyota-may-be-in-talks-to-build-priuses-together-and-is-toyota-really-looking-at-e-revs/#comment-43634</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizzly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1092#comment-43634</guid>
		<description>Noel #103

While I would agree in some instances, in this one I don&#039;t.  GM has it&#039;s own hybrids and I just don&#039;t believe they would ever sell a product that would pull the table cloth right out from under their own ramp-up of E-rev vehicles.  I believe that even after the Gm-Volt waiting list has been satisfied, there will be a long waiting list for E-rev vehicles.

Instead of re-badging the Prius,  GM should look to re-platform the Opel Corsa, a pure ICE vehicle that gets 58mpg highway, for sale here in the US as a Chevy.  This vehicle outperforms the Smart car in every way  including space.  This would make much more sense and would leverage their own economies of scale.  The money would stay with GM and it&#039;s own development. The difference would be that there may very well be economy conscious people who would never consider a Hybrid or RE-BEV, and GM global has the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noel #103</p>
<p>While I would agree in some instances, in this one I don&#8217;t.  GM has it&#8217;s own hybrids and I just don&#8217;t believe they would ever sell a product that would pull the table cloth right out from under their own ramp-up of E-rev vehicles.  I believe that even after the Gm-Volt waiting list has been satisfied, there will be a long waiting list for E-rev vehicles.</p>
<p>Instead of re-badging the Prius,  GM should look to re-platform the Opel Corsa, a pure ICE vehicle that gets 58mpg highway, for sale here in the US as a Chevy.  This vehicle outperforms the Smart car in every way  including space.  This would make much more sense and would leverage their own economies of scale.  The money would stay with GM and it&#8217;s own development. The difference would be that there may very well be economy conscious people who would never consider a Hybrid or RE-BEV, and GM global has the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
