<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Even Chevy Volt Battery Suppliers Surprised at GM&#8217;s Volt Aggressiveness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:55:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Maxon</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/#comment-53894</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Maxon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1022#comment-53894</guid>
		<description>Please hurry up with the Volt!!Do you think maybe it can be ready by the end of 2009.I will be buying one as soon as they are available if it is under $30,000.It will be for my wife.She mostly drives around town each day(under 40 miles),so the little gas generator will probably never have to run.We will be able to go a whole month(or two)on the one12 gallon tank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please hurry up with the Volt!!Do you think maybe it can be ready by the end of 2009.I will be buying one as soon as they are available if it is under $30,000.It will be for my wife.She mostly drives around town each day(under 40 miles),so the little gas generator will probably never have to run.We will be able to go a whole month(or two)on the one12 gallon tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Gudme</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/#comment-43789</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Gudme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1022#comment-43789</guid>
		<description>Its about time they made an electric car that looks cool most of them look like something most people would not want to be seen in, but the Volt looks tough like a real car should.  I am excited for the Volt to be available for purchase and will be one of the first in line to buy it when its available, so don&#039;t underproduce them GM.  Everyone is going to want one especially when gas prices will most likely be over 6 dollars a gallon by 2010. HURRY!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its about time they made an electric car that looks cool most of them look like something most people would not want to be seen in, but the Volt looks tough like a real car should.  I am excited for the Volt to be available for purchase and will be one of the first in line to buy it when its available, so don&#8217;t underproduce them GM.  Everyone is going to want one especially when gas prices will most likely be over 6 dollars a gallon by 2010. HURRY!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Sutter</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/#comment-38091</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Sutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1022#comment-38091</guid>
		<description>#66 Charlie H

Of course you&#039;re dead right.  At $47,500 Californians will be able to buy the BEV Phoenix short bed pickup later this year.  With a &gt;100 mile range it covers most commutes.  I don&#039;t know whether the dramatically reduced maintenance footprint (25% of ICE) and the fuel efficiency will actually cost justify it, but there&#039;s an outstanding chance that the vehicle will last for 250K miles using up rear breaks and tires only.  That buys a lot of time to amortize capital premium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#66 Charlie H</p>
<p>Of course you&#8217;re dead right.  At $47,500 Californians will be able to buy the BEV Phoenix short bed pickup later this year.  With a &gt;100 mile range it covers most commutes.  I don&#8217;t know whether the dramatically reduced maintenance footprint (25% of ICE) and the fuel efficiency will actually cost justify it, but there&#8217;s an outstanding chance that the vehicle will last for 250K miles using up rear breaks and tires only.  That buys a lot of time to amortize capital premium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Harmon</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/#comment-37911</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1022#comment-37911</guid>
		<description>Someone please explain the quote by Prabhakar Patil who is the CEO of Compact Power Inc.  &quot;What I worry about is a black eye–if somebody puts a battery on the road prematurely, it would hurt the entire industry.&quot;  Exactly what does he mean?  Is he afraid somebody will beat him to the market ?  Or is he afraid that bad technology will damage his technolgy ?  Well, Prabhakar - there will be a battery on the road before yours my friend, and a totally electric car well before the Volt (which is not totally electric), the Think or the Tesla.  

Just wait a few more weeks and you will see it for yourself.  I hope you don&#039;t poke your eye out Prab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone please explain the quote by Prabhakar Patil who is the CEO of Compact Power Inc.  &#8220;What I worry about is a black eye–if somebody puts a battery on the road prematurely, it would hurt the entire industry.&#8221;  Exactly what does he mean?  Is he afraid somebody will beat him to the market ?  Or is he afraid that bad technology will damage his technolgy ?  Well, Prabhakar &#8211; there will be a battery on the road before yours my friend, and a totally electric car well before the Volt (which is not totally electric), the Think or the Tesla.  </p>
<p>Just wait a few more weeks and you will see it for yourself.  I hope you don&#8217;t poke your eye out Prab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie H</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/#comment-37606</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1022#comment-37606</guid>
		<description>#65, Jeff Sutter,

That&#039;s the absolute best-case scenario (14,600 miles/year with 40 miles EVERY day) for the Volt and I notice you didn&#039;t look at the projected price differential.  If the Volt becomes available for $42K and Toyota holds the Prius to $21,100 (they&#039;re ramping up to 1/2 million/year, so I think we can reasonably expect further economies of scale), then the Volt has to show $20,900 in savings over some reasonable projected lifetime.  Presuming the &#039;10 Prius gets 50mpg (they are at 45 now and Toyota intends to better that), that&#039;s $1460 for the Prius in fuel each year.  You shortchanged the Volt a little, I get $321 to &quot;fuel&quot; it for the year, electric-only.  The advantage to the Volt is $1139/year in &quot;fuel&quot; costs and the simple Volt payback is $20,900/$1139 = about 18 years.

Now, add a time value to your money.  If you put your $20,900 left over buying a Prius instead of a Volt to work, you earn about a thousand dollars a year.  The Volt advantage shrinks to just $139 per year.  The revised payback is $20,900/$139 = about 150 years, or 120 years after the cars have been junked.  That&#039;s not a payoff.

Another way to look at this is, buy the Prius in 2011, keep the $20900 in your pocket and buy a true, longer-range BEV for your daily commute in 2012 or 2013, in addition to you Prius.

If you change any of the parameters of use (add some periodic long trips, figure a longer or shorter daily commute), the Volt loses some of its fuel cost advantage over the Prius.  40 Miles per day, every day, is absolutely the Volt&#039;s optimum use cycle.  Anything other than that either diminishes the miles traveled and, therefore, the savings over the Prius or increases the cost of miles traveled and the Prius gains on incremental cost.  Either way, a change lengthens the Volt payoff or negates it altogether.

The thing about the Prius is that, although people criticize it for it&#039;s &quot;lookitme&quot; green factors, it&#039;s still reasonably priced.  Hard-headed people with no stake in the environment, oil independence or any other societal factor can look at the cost of operation and see a savings over a mid-priced sedan and go ahead and buy it.  If gas goes up, their savings look even better.

With the Volt&#039;s projected large price penalty, it&#039;s very difficult to make a &quot;business&quot; case for the car and that means its principal value is in societal factors.  In other words, it&#039;s &quot;lookitme&quot; greenness that will sell - or not sell - this car.  And it&#039;s a $20K committment to &quot;lookitme&quot; greenness, which is a big chunk of change.  For that, you could buy solar cells, solar heat/hot water or a windmill.

GM has got to find a way to manufacture it at a reasonable price.  I don&#039;t mean subsidize it from other profits, that&#039;s the road to Chapter 11.  They have got to do what Toyota&#039;s doing; relentlessly drive down the cost to produce each additional vehicle and get that incremental production cost down to the point where they can afford to build and sell a lot of them and still make a little money (or at least break even).

This is where GM has, apparently, failed with their current crop of hybrids.  Given their financial position, it&#039;s not a mistake they should repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#65, Jeff Sutter,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the absolute best-case scenario (14,600 miles/year with 40 miles EVERY day) for the Volt and I notice you didn&#8217;t look at the projected price differential.  If the Volt becomes available for $42K and Toyota holds the Prius to $21,100 (they&#8217;re ramping up to 1/2 million/year, so I think we can reasonably expect further economies of scale), then the Volt has to show $20,900 in savings over some reasonable projected lifetime.  Presuming the &#8216;10 Prius gets 50mpg (they are at 45 now and Toyota intends to better that), that&#8217;s $1460 for the Prius in fuel each year.  You shortchanged the Volt a little, I get $321 to &#8220;fuel&#8221; it for the year, electric-only.  The advantage to the Volt is $1139/year in &#8220;fuel&#8221; costs and the simple Volt payback is $20,900/$1139 = about 18 years.</p>
<p>Now, add a time value to your money.  If you put your $20,900 left over buying a Prius instead of a Volt to work, you earn about a thousand dollars a year.  The Volt advantage shrinks to just $139 per year.  The revised payback is $20,900/$139 = about 150 years, or 120 years after the cars have been junked.  That&#8217;s not a payoff.</p>
<p>Another way to look at this is, buy the Prius in 2011, keep the $20900 in your pocket and buy a true, longer-range BEV for your daily commute in 2012 or 2013, in addition to you Prius.</p>
<p>If you change any of the parameters of use (add some periodic long trips, figure a longer or shorter daily commute), the Volt loses some of its fuel cost advantage over the Prius.  40 Miles per day, every day, is absolutely the Volt&#8217;s optimum use cycle.  Anything other than that either diminishes the miles traveled and, therefore, the savings over the Prius or increases the cost of miles traveled and the Prius gains on incremental cost.  Either way, a change lengthens the Volt payoff or negates it altogether.</p>
<p>The thing about the Prius is that, although people criticize it for it&#8217;s &#8220;lookitme&#8221; green factors, it&#8217;s still reasonably priced.  Hard-headed people with no stake in the environment, oil independence or any other societal factor can look at the cost of operation and see a savings over a mid-priced sedan and go ahead and buy it.  If gas goes up, their savings look even better.</p>
<p>With the Volt&#8217;s projected large price penalty, it&#8217;s very difficult to make a &#8220;business&#8221; case for the car and that means its principal value is in societal factors.  In other words, it&#8217;s &#8220;lookitme&#8221; greenness that will sell &#8211; or not sell &#8211; this car.  And it&#8217;s a $20K committment to &#8220;lookitme&#8221; greenness, which is a big chunk of change.  For that, you could buy solar cells, solar heat/hot water or a windmill.</p>
<p>GM has got to find a way to manufacture it at a reasonable price.  I don&#8217;t mean subsidize it from other profits, that&#8217;s the road to Chapter 11.  They have got to do what Toyota&#8217;s doing; relentlessly drive down the cost to produce each additional vehicle and get that incremental production cost down to the point where they can afford to build and sell a lot of them and still make a little money (or at least break even).</p>
<p>This is where GM has, apparently, failed with their current crop of hybrids.  Given their financial position, it&#8217;s not a mistake they should repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Sutter</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/#comment-37596</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Sutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1022#comment-37596</guid>
		<description>The Volt will get more than 100mpg on average - double the Prius at best.  The higher the price of gas goes, the greater the advantage of the Volt.   People aren&#039;t stupid - when they see that spending $10K more on a car saves them $20k in fuel over the car&#039;s lifetime they&#039;ll buy it.

The Volt&#039;s due out in late 2010.  Let&#039;s see, the cost of gas is headed to $4.00 now.  What about in two years? $5.00 per gallon?  No one can say that that&#039;s out of the question.  

Prius QuickMath: 40 miles/day, 50-35 mpg, $5/gal = $120 - $170/mo.

Volt QuickMath: 40 mile/day, 2.5 miles/kwh, $.11/kwh  = $53/month

40 miles/day = 14,600/year - about average.  The trip to grandma&#039;s in the Volt costs more/mile but not as much as the Prius by 1/2.

Money doesn&#039;t talk, it swears:-)  Maybe it&#039;s just me, but I think the Volt wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Volt will get more than 100mpg on average &#8211; double the Prius at best.  The higher the price of gas goes, the greater the advantage of the Volt.   People aren&#8217;t stupid &#8211; when they see that spending $10K more on a car saves them $20k in fuel over the car&#8217;s lifetime they&#8217;ll buy it.</p>
<p>The Volt&#8217;s due out in late 2010.  Let&#8217;s see, the cost of gas is headed to $4.00 now.  What about in two years? $5.00 per gallon?  No one can say that that&#8217;s out of the question.  </p>
<p>Prius QuickMath: 40 miles/day, 50-35 mpg, $5/gal = $120 &#8211; $170/mo.</p>
<p>Volt QuickMath: 40 mile/day, 2.5 miles/kwh, $.11/kwh  = $53/month</p>
<p>40 miles/day = 14,600/year &#8211; about average.  The trip to grandma&#8217;s in the Volt costs more/mile but not as much as the Prius by 1/2.</p>
<p>Money doesn&#8217;t talk, it swears:-)  Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but I think the Volt wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason The Saj</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/#comment-37414</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason The Saj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1022#comment-37414</guid>
		<description>Ed = naive, GM did not kill the EV1. Toyota &amp; Honda did. By killing the Zero Emissions requirement. 


Prius versus Volt Sales Forecast:

Prius wins...due to cheaper cost.

Future E-Flex vehicles versus Prius.
Prius falls far behind as GM ramps up E-Flex across it&#039;s line. The Cobalt versus Malibu, the Charge versus Volt.  GM&#039;s put a lot into a platform design.  Where as the Prius is a great design, it is NOT a platform.  The result, other Toyota hybrids get no where near the Prius performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed = naive, GM did not kill the EV1. Toyota &amp; Honda did. By killing the Zero Emissions requirement. </p>
<p>Prius versus Volt Sales Forecast:</p>
<p>Prius wins&#8230;due to cheaper cost.</p>
<p>Future E-Flex vehicles versus Prius.<br />
Prius falls far behind as GM ramps up E-Flex across it&#8217;s line. The Cobalt versus Malibu, the Charge versus Volt.  GM&#8217;s put a lot into a platform design.  Where as the Prius is a great design, it is NOT a platform.  The result, other Toyota hybrids get no where near the Prius performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Marshall</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/#comment-37259</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1022#comment-37259</guid>
		<description>On GM aggressiveness - why die without a fight? Give &#039;M  hell GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On GM aggressiveness &#8211; why die without a fight? Give &#8216;M  hell GM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jabroni</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/#comment-37255</link>
		<dc:creator>jabroni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1022#comment-37255</guid>
		<description>Hey Prabakhar - There is not time left to worry about black eyes.

Since CARB buckled and caved in, we essential have lost 10 years of development in the electric auto industry. Full speed ahead now....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Prabakhar &#8211; There is not time left to worry about black eyes.</p>
<p>Since CARB buckled and caved in, we essential have lost 10 years of development in the electric auto industry. Full speed ahead now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rockyroad</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/04/15/even-chevy-volt-battery-suppliers-surprised-at-gms-volt-aggressiveness/#comment-37245</link>
		<dc:creator>Rockyroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gm-volt.com/?p=1022#comment-37245</guid>
		<description># 14 Joe ....
Toyota knows what it’s doing” and I guess GM doesn’t. The great Toyota can do no wrong. Are you American? Why don’t you have a little more pride with our country.  

I am an American and I am proud of my country, and I bought a new Ford Ranger in 2003. The Alernator went at 23,000 miles. The new battery was defective from the day I bought the truck and the dealer service never found it. I found that the spare tire on the truck was SMALLER than the tires on the tuck and that if we had used it the rear end could have been damaged. You don&#039;t have to guess what kind of pickup I bought in 2007.. Tacoma. 
My pride in country does not extend beyond my wallet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 14 Joe &#8230;.<br />
Toyota knows what it’s doing” and I guess GM doesn’t. The great Toyota can do no wrong. Are you American? Why don’t you have a little more pride with our country.  </p>
<p>I am an American and I am proud of my country, and I bought a new Ford Ranger in 2003. The Alernator went at 23,000 miles. The new battery was defective from the day I bought the truck and the dealer service never found it. I found that the spare tire on the truck was SMALLER than the tires on the tuck and that if we had used it the rear end could have been damaged. You don&#8217;t have to guess what kind of pickup I bought in 2007.. Tacoma.<br />
My pride in country does not extend beyond my wallet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.392 seconds -->
