<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did GM CEO Rick Wagoner Really Change Anything about the Volt&#8217;s Release Date?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:28:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mykallb</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/#comment-25482</link>
		<dc:creator>mykallb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/#comment-25482</guid>
		<description>#  Guy Incognito Says:
January 7th, 2008 at 3:56 pm Quote

&quot;GM can’t be bothered with the Volt right now, they’re to busy trying build cars that drive themselves.&quot;

====================

Very good point Guy.  Not only does it not make any sense, you should understand that the superlative of &quot;to&quot; is &quot;too&quot;.  

You&#039;re an IDIOT pure and simple.  You do not need anyone&#039;s help on this.

M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#  Guy Incognito Says:<br />
January 7th, 2008 at 3:56 pm Quote</p>
<p>&#8220;GM can’t be bothered with the Volt right now, they’re to busy trying build cars that drive themselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>====================</p>
<p>Very good point Guy.  Not only does it not make any sense, you should understand that the superlative of &#8220;to&#8221; is &#8220;too&#8221;.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re an IDIOT pure and simple.  You do not need anyone&#8217;s help on this.</p>
<p>M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1EK</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/#comment-25262</link>
		<dc:creator>M1EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/#comment-25262</guid>
		<description>The key difference for me is that Toyota didn&#039;t start hyping the Prius until it was ready to sell. Get it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key difference for me is that Toyota didn&#8217;t start hyping the Prius until it was ready to sell. Get it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eco</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/#comment-25260</link>
		<dc:creator>Eco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/#comment-25260</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t have to be brainwashed into disliking GM...they did plenty over the years to give valid reasons to be disliked.  The question to the continued existance of GM is, can they overcome that?

That is why one little tiny restatement of already known news, is such a big deal.  Fortune.com (posted today I think) profiled the &quot;big turnaround&quot; (my quotes, not theirs) of GM in their quest to regain the trust of customers.  GM&#039;s struggle is an ongoing story, and Bob Lutz has made the Volt a cornerstone of that story.  So yes, anything that even looks like hedging is going to get attention.  

What GM execs need to realize, perhaps, is that they already have the attention of the interested public.  Just saying &quot;we are still on track to meet our goal&quot; is news, believe it or not, because the goal is so significant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t have to be brainwashed into disliking GM&#8230;they did plenty over the years to give valid reasons to be disliked.  The question to the continued existance of GM is, can they overcome that?</p>
<p>That is why one little tiny restatement of already known news, is such a big deal.  Fortune.com (posted today I think) profiled the &#8220;big turnaround&#8221; (my quotes, not theirs) of GM in their quest to regain the trust of customers.  GM&#8217;s struggle is an ongoing story, and Bob Lutz has made the Volt a cornerstone of that story.  So yes, anything that even looks like hedging is going to get attention.  </p>
<p>What GM execs need to realize, perhaps, is that they already have the attention of the interested public.  Just saying &#8220;we are still on track to meet our goal&#8221; is news, believe it or not, because the goal is so significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark H</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/#comment-25108</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/#comment-25108</guid>
		<description>My first thought when I seen this new blog post was oh I hope Lyle does not feel guilty that it was his question that started a landslide of GM stock and he is doing what he can in damage control.In a few days just as many informed traders will take advantage of this happenstance and make money as the uninformed ones who bailed for no reason.
   I would much rather that they take the time, test the battery in every conceivable manner and then are confidant enough to offer it for sale as well as lease in 2011.

Mark H (one of two here)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought when I seen this new blog post was oh I hope Lyle does not feel guilty that it was his question that started a landslide of GM stock and he is doing what he can in damage control.In a few days just as many informed traders will take advantage of this happenstance and make money as the uninformed ones who bailed for no reason.<br />
   I would much rather that they take the time, test the battery in every conceivable manner and then are confidant enough to offer it for sale as well as lease in 2011.</p>
<p>Mark H (one of two here)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent beuchert</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/#comment-25098</link>
		<dc:creator>kent beuchert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2008/01/07/did-gm-ceo-rick-wagoner-really-change-anything-about-the-volts-release-date/#comment-25098</guid>
		<description>Rona Ansana of NBC was the only non-braindead voice I heard yesterday about this. He said there was no news here and was questioning the intelligence of the stock market, which sold off GM stock, aparently based on this non-news item. You have to remember that most media outlets know nothing about the VOLT and many green blogs are populated with those brainwashed into despising GM, and  who aren&#039;t too picky about what is true and what&#039;s not. Some of the headlines I saw would lead their readers to believe that Wagoner had called a prss conference to announce that the VOLT was being delayed!!! 
  Lyle, a little advice : don&#039;t present a
statement like that one as if it were a news item or those who know nothing about the VOLT will think it must be news, else why would it be released? At the very least, a phrase should have been appended, noting  that Wagoner&#039;s remarks represented no change to GM&#039;s previous remarks. We&#039;re dealing with an incompetent news media, and  bunch of truly incompetent internet websites. We also don&#039;t hand loaded guns to three year old children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rona Ansana of NBC was the only non-braindead voice I heard yesterday about this. He said there was no news here and was questioning the intelligence of the stock market, which sold off GM stock, aparently based on this non-news item. You have to remember that most media outlets know nothing about the VOLT and many green blogs are populated with those brainwashed into despising GM, and  who aren&#8217;t too picky about what is true and what&#8217;s not. Some of the headlines I saw would lead their readers to believe that Wagoner had called a prss conference to announce that the VOLT was being delayed!!!<br />
  Lyle, a little advice : don&#8217;t present a<br />
statement like that one as if it were a news item or those who know nothing about the VOLT will think it must be news, else why would it be released? At the very least, a phrase should have been appended, noting  that Wagoner&#8217;s remarks represented no change to GM&#8217;s previous remarks. We&#8217;re dealing with an incompetent news media, and  bunch of truly incompetent internet websites. We also don&#8217;t hand loaded guns to three year old children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
