<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM Official Chevy Volt E-Flex Briefing Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:53:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Korthof</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/#comment-87714</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Korthof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/#comment-87714</guid>
		<description>If Lithium doesn&#039;t work out -- LOL!  Lithium works fine, but doesn&#039;t last longer than 50,000 miles in an EV.  In the Tesla, you are going to expect that even with very careful treatment, you will be buying a new pack shortly after 50K miles.

So what would GM do if Lithium only lasted 50K miles?  Well, they will call the VOLT a failure, of course, and claim that they lost a billion dollars on the program.

Just as they did in 1997 with the EV1, until Toyota and Honda came out with the NiMH RAV4-EV and HondaEV.

But now, Toyota is in the Auto Alliance, and is tamed and humbled; they won&#039;t violate the restrictive agreements to fight Chevron, and thus, they can&#039;t build a NiMH EV either.

But the ironic thing is, if GM stopped LYING about the EV1, they could use off-the-shelf PSB EV-FC 1260 lead-acid batteries to drive the VOLT 40 miles on a charge!  Because the very similar EV-EC 1260 PSB batteries gave the EV1 a 100 miles range.

So even if Chevron forbids use of NiMH (in my view illegally and outrageously), and even if Lithium fails from a cost and life-cycle perspective (in the VOLT, it&#039;s not a problem in the Tesla, they will just pay for new packs), GM could, if it stopped lying, use lead-acid for the VOLT.

And could, if it were serious, force Chevron to disgorge control of the patents.  Actually, ownership of the patents resides in Ovonics, it&#039;s the exclusive worldwide patent licensing rights that are being squatted on by Chevron; so you can&#039;t say it&#039;s exactly &quot;patent&quot; squatting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Lithium doesn&#8217;t work out &#8212; LOL!  Lithium works fine, but doesn&#8217;t last longer than 50,000 miles in an EV.  In the Tesla, you are going to expect that even with very careful treatment, you will be buying a new pack shortly after 50K miles.</p>
<p>So what would GM do if Lithium only lasted 50K miles?  Well, they will call the VOLT a failure, of course, and claim that they lost a billion dollars on the program.</p>
<p>Just as they did in 1997 with the EV1, until Toyota and Honda came out with the NiMH RAV4-EV and HondaEV.</p>
<p>But now, Toyota is in the Auto Alliance, and is tamed and humbled; they won&#8217;t violate the restrictive agreements to fight Chevron, and thus, they can&#8217;t build a NiMH EV either.</p>
<p>But the ironic thing is, if GM stopped LYING about the EV1, they could use off-the-shelf PSB EV-FC 1260 lead-acid batteries to drive the VOLT 40 miles on a charge!  Because the very similar EV-EC 1260 PSB batteries gave the EV1 a 100 miles range.</p>
<p>So even if Chevron forbids use of NiMH (in my view illegally and outrageously), and even if Lithium fails from a cost and life-cycle perspective (in the VOLT, it&#8217;s not a problem in the Tesla, they will just pay for new packs), GM could, if it stopped lying, use lead-acid for the VOLT.</p>
<p>And could, if it were serious, force Chevron to disgorge control of the patents.  Actually, ownership of the patents resides in Ovonics, it&#8217;s the exclusive worldwide patent licensing rights that are being squatted on by Chevron; so you can&#8217;t say it&#8217;s exactly &#8220;patent&#8221; squatting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grizzly</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/#comment-17240</link>
		<dc:creator>Grizzly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/#comment-17240</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing they&#039;re pretty confident at this point that scaled up Li-ion will work.  It&#039;s already working on a smaller scale in B&amp;D&#039;s premium DeWalt tools. 

Gotta&#039; believe they&#039;d be more apt to delay the Volt than to consider another batt technology.
There is really only 1 alternative and that won&#039;t meet the Volt&#039;s design criteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing they&#8217;re pretty confident at this point that scaled up Li-ion will work.  It&#8217;s already working on a smaller scale in B&amp;D&#8217;s premium DeWalt tools. </p>
<p>Gotta&#8217; believe they&#8217;d be more apt to delay the Volt than to consider another batt technology.<br />
There is really only 1 alternative and that won&#8217;t meet the Volt&#8217;s design criteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charley</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/#comment-17160</link>
		<dc:creator>charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/#comment-17160</guid>
		<description>I was just wondering, has anyone heard of a plan B for the volt if the lithum battery doesn&#039;t work out?   CW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just wondering, has anyone heard of a plan B for the volt if the lithum battery doesn&#8217;t work out?   CW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/#comment-17061</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/#comment-17061</guid>
		<description>&quot;This video is no longer available&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This video is no longer available&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AES</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/#comment-17054</link>
		<dc:creator>AES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/11/29/gm-official-chevy-volt-e-flex-briefing-part-1/#comment-17054</guid>
		<description>re:A123/Chevron - neither has done any &quot;gobbling&quot;. The two companies are merely doing a technical collaboration, and the patents have not come into play. A123 builds the cells, and Chevron builds the packs for the Saturn Vue.

It&#039;s the same situation with A123/Contintental for the Volt pack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re:A123/Chevron &#8211; neither has done any &#8220;gobbling&#8221;. The two companies are merely doing a technical collaboration, and the patents have not come into play. A123 builds the cells, and Chevron builds the packs for the Saturn Vue.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same situation with A123/Contintental for the Volt pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 405/405 objects using apc

Served from: gm-volt.com @ 2012-05-24 23:23:56 -->
