<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is GM planning an E-Flex Cadillac?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:25:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drake</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/#comment-10457</link>
		<dc:creator>Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/#comment-10457</guid>
		<description>E-Flex will eventually end up in all of GM&#039;s vehicles.  ICE-only cars will become antiquated dinosaurs that our grandchildren laugh about.  I can see the basic E-Flex designed hanging around for a good 100 years after it debutes in the Volt.  It is such a radical departure from the old, outdated, and inefficent design that plagues all of today&#039;s vehicles- it truely is the next generation of technology for the automobile Industry.  Whether they realize it or not, the people working on this project are changing the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-Flex will eventually end up in all of GM&#8217;s vehicles.  ICE-only cars will become antiquated dinosaurs that our grandchildren laugh about.  I can see the basic E-Flex designed hanging around for a good 100 years after it debutes in the Volt.  It is such a radical departure from the old, outdated, and inefficent design that plagues all of today&#8217;s vehicles- it truely is the next generation of technology for the automobile Industry.  Whether they realize it or not, the people working on this project are changing the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OhmExcited</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/#comment-10449</link>
		<dc:creator>OhmExcited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/#comment-10449</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no reason why the generalized e-flex architecture couldn&#039;t be expanded to Cadillac. And no reason why a hydrogen fuel cell couldn&#039;t be used -- the onboard generator would be used more in a larger vehicle, and fuel cells are quiet, a luxury value; fuel cells are also more expensive, and could be mass produced first for the Cadillac brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no reason why the generalized e-flex architecture couldn&#8217;t be expanded to Cadillac. And no reason why a hydrogen fuel cell couldn&#8217;t be used &#8212; the onboard generator would be used more in a larger vehicle, and fuel cells are quiet, a luxury value; fuel cells are also more expensive, and could be mass produced first for the Cadillac brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave G</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/#comment-10434</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/#comment-10434</guid>
		<description>Well, obviously they need to focus on the Volt first and get that right.  But after that, I don&#039;t see any problem with a Cadillac E-Flex.  I think the main attributes of Cadillac are comfort and status.  

With American speed limits, gobs of power has been more of a status symbol than anything useful.  But I think this is starting to change.  There&#039;s a new green kind of status starting to take hold.  So in the end, a Cadillac E-Flex probably doesn&#039;t need gobs of power.

Sure, a Cadillac E-Flex would need a little more power.  This can be done with a bigger battery pack, electric motor and ICE.  But I think the real difference will be an ultra-smooth, quiet, and responsive ride plus plenty of comfort/convenience extras.  This will make it a Cadillac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, obviously they need to focus on the Volt first and get that right.  But after that, I don&#8217;t see any problem with a Cadillac E-Flex.  I think the main attributes of Cadillac are comfort and status.  </p>
<p>With American speed limits, gobs of power has been more of a status symbol than anything useful.  But I think this is starting to change.  There&#8217;s a new green kind of status starting to take hold.  So in the end, a Cadillac E-Flex probably doesn&#8217;t need gobs of power.</p>
<p>Sure, a Cadillac E-Flex would need a little more power.  This can be done with a bigger battery pack, electric motor and ICE.  But I think the real difference will be an ultra-smooth, quiet, and responsive ride plus plenty of comfort/convenience extras.  This will make it a Cadillac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/#comment-10430</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/#comment-10430</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;10423&quot;]Jim if you want to cater to power then electric has more potential than ICE![/quote]

It seems that in your excitement, you missed my point.  I did not argue that Cadillac should never get E-Flex or that ICEs are better.  From a marketing standpoint, Cadillac would probably sell more environmentally friendly cars if they were parallel hybrids.

While I have your attention again, Buick has decided to make its main focus reliability, and kudos for their gains.  The E-Flex would probably do well there after it has:
1. Proven to be be basically reliable
2. The ICE was replaced with either all electric or at least a diesel engine to stress reliability.  (Not hydrogen or anything exotic, since the typical conservative Buick buyer would fear the safety.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="10423"]Jim if you want to cater to power then electric has more potential than ICE![/quote]</p>
<p>It seems that in your excitement, you missed my point.  I did not argue that Cadillac should never get E-Flex or that ICEs are better.  From a marketing standpoint, Cadillac would probably sell more environmentally friendly cars if they were parallel hybrids.</p>
<p>While I have your attention again, Buick has decided to make its main focus reliability, and kudos for their gains.  The E-Flex would probably do well there after it has:<br />
1. Proven to be be basically reliable<br />
2. The ICE was replaced with either all electric or at least a diesel engine to stress reliability.  (Not hydrogen or anything exotic, since the typical conservative Buick buyer would fear the safety.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/#comment-10429</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/10/09/is-gm-planning-an-e-flex-cadillac/#comment-10429</guid>
		<description>I think that GM producing a Cadillac with the E-Flex would be a good thing. It would not require that much more effort to produce. The technology is the difficult part, not the implementing it in the car. 

Also, GM says that the E-Flex might initially loose money, but GM could charge more money for an E-Flex Cadillac than a $25k Chevy because people pay more for Cadillacs. 

That being said, I still want the Volt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that GM producing a Cadillac with the E-Flex would be a good thing. It would not require that much more effort to produce. The technology is the difficult part, not the implementing it in the car. </p>
<p>Also, GM says that the E-Flex might initially loose money, but GM could charge more money for an E-Flex Cadillac than a $25k Chevy because people pay more for Cadillacs. </p>
<p>That being said, I still want the Volt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 405/405 objects using apc

Served from: gm-volt.com @ 2012-05-24 14:38:19 -->
