Archive for September, 2007

 

Sep 30

New PHEV Consortium Bashes the Chevy Volt

 

rmilogo.gif

The Rocky Mountain Institute has formed a plug-in electric vehicle (PHEV) consortium who will work with a group of companies, Google among them, to design what is in their opinion an ideal PHEV for the U.S.

This team is actually headed by John Waters who had once helped to design the EV-1 battery pack and has once worked with lithium-ion battery company EnerDel.

Mr. Waters has publicly declared that the Volts’ design and engineering are flawed and doomed to failure:

“[The Volt] is a 4,000-pound vehicle. The drag coefficient is around .30. They [GM] forgot everything they learned on the EV1 so for me, it is a very discouraging concept, the fact that it is inefficient.

Therefore if it is inefficient, it takes more batteries on board…and batteries cost money, and you’re not going to pay for them. So this is a concept that is not going to work.

So until they start hearing the RMI message, really, of lighten your vehicle, make it more efficient, and that the energy you put on board is a minimum…then you can afford it. The cost equation does work.”

It is a great thing that there are so many opinions out there, we must be on the verge of a revolution.

In terms of the curb weight for the prototype:

EV-1: 3084 lbs   Chevy Volt: 3140 lbs

Sour grapes Mr. Waters?

Thanks to Alex for the tip.

Source (Green Car Congress)

 

Sep 29

GM-Volt EXCLUSIVE Interview: Tom Schneider, Chair IEEE-USA Plug-in Vehicle Task Force

 

ieeeusa-logo.jpg

The IEEE-USA is the predominant U.S. organizing body of practicing electrical engineers. IEEE stands for Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Their membership includes over 50% of all practicing electrical engineers in the U.S., which amounts to 215,000 individuals. They are responsible for publishing ~25% of the nations technical literature, and focus on members career development.

As one of many areas of practical interest that the group fosters is the development of plug-in electric vehicles. Dr. Thomas Schneider, himself involved in electric car engineering since the 70s serves as Chairman of the IEEE-USA plug-in vehicle task force. IEEE hosted a one-day symposium on PHEVs on September 19, 2007. The event included Keith Cole, engineer from GM, and many other members. I had the opportunity to interview Dr. Schneider after the conference, and a full audio of the interview follows this post.

I have noticed the IEEE comes up a lot when plug-in cars are discussed so I thought this interview would be helpful for us to learn exactly what role the IEEE plays in this technological revolution.

First, is important to note that as engineers develop PHEVs, they are likely to present their findings to the IEEE and submit them to IEEE publications for peer-review. In that sense, the IEEE stands at the forefront of accepting, validating , and disseminating these important PHEV developments. Indeed GM Volt engineers are members of IEEE and attend their conferences.

Dr. Schneider points out the IEEE also plays an important role in interfacing with vehicle original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) such as GM and the U.S. government. They do so by helping to advance technical and energy policy. This is done in one way by developing position statements including those related to PHEVs. He noted that at present there are two bills being processed by Congress. In the Senate is the CAFE standards bill and in the House, the PHEV tax bill. The PHEV bill is relevant to us because it could lead to tax breaks both for individuals buying these cars, and for the OEMs who make them, in that way the government can help to subsidize the Volts development. IEEE helps to lobby for these outcomes, and in specific helps to promote policy favoring the adoption of PHEVs.

Dr. Schneider indicates that there are significant risks for OEMs in developing PHEVs, since new unproven technology will still have to be held to warranty standards that could potentially fail to be met over the long-term.

He is however, specifically confident that PHEVs could be mass produced by 2010, as GM plans. He also cautions about the risk technical and financial of these cars and presents the idea of being able to upgrade batteries at a later date.

Dr. Schneider indicated that the IEEE highly supports the position of mass deployment of PHEV as a viable means for reducing petroleum use, environmental harm, and reducing energy costs. He indicates widespread PHEV adoption is possible, necessary, and highly likely.

One of several outcomes from the symposium was a general consensus that there is sufficient U.S. off-peak grid energy to sustain widespread electric car use.
Other outcomes will soon be published.

To learn more:

IEEE-USA Website

Here is an outline of the PHEV Symposium Program, and you can see Keth Cole’s E-Flex presentation there:

Program

 

Sep 28

GM Commits to Volt Production in Detroit-Hamtramck, Michigan 2010

 

hamtramck.jpg

New documents provided to UAW provides terms details of GMs plans for future production.

The document indicates that the Global Delta Volt production is set to begin there in 2010.

Full Document Here (ITS ON PAGE 11): (LINK)

Now we’re gettin’ somewhere, baby Volt has a birthplace, and its right in the heart of Detroit. Are there still any skeptics out there?

Thanks to MB for the tip.

Here’s a snippet from the doc:

snip-uaw.jpg

 

Sep 28

New Harris Poll: More Than 25% of Car Owners Plan PHEV as Next Car

 

volt_plug.jpg

In the AutoTECHCASTSM study, 27% of U.S. vehicle owners said they were likely (13%), very likely (8%) or extremely likely (6%) to make a PHEV their next vehicle.
When told there would be a $3,200 price premium, the consideration rate dropped to a total of 16%.

Males and females were equally likely to include the technology in their next vehicle, while entry SUV owners (45%) showed the most interest in plug-in hybrid technology compared to other vehicle type owners.

The data was collected via the Internet from June 28 to July 18, 2007 and included nearly 10,000 U.S. vehicle owners.

On the flip side of this study, it was demonstrated that a full 47% of respondents were not at all familiar with the PHEV technology, this was true for 40% of males and 56% of females.

For those who were at least likely to purchase a plug-in, 84% said they would prefer plugging in the car in overnight, whereas only 7% said they would prefer a once-a-week gas fill-up.

You can review the details of of the study results yourself here: (HARRIS POLL)

It is interesting that only a minority of people see the value of this technology, and that nearly half the population have no idea about it.

We need to get the word out. Any thoughts, ideas?

 

Sep 27

More Fighting Words From Bob Lutz

 

toyota-ceo.jpg

The strike is over, and GM has an improved position against competitors with the health care nugget off the books. Now its time to get back to hybrid technology revolution-making.

Next month we will see the release to dealers of the first-ever two-mode hybrids in form of Chevy Tahoe and GMC Yukon (read my test drive). We also now know the official mpgs of these big vehicles..21/22 city/hwy up from the base of 14/20.

It’s time for GM to wage war, and Bob Lutz has fired off some fighting words.

With respect to the fact that Toyota has run into lithium-ion battery troubles, and the fact that they have publicly commented that Volt technology is “unsafe”, Mr Lutz had this to say:

“There’s so much negativism, especially from one competitor,” GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz said. “The sooner we can disprove that, the sooner they’ve got some more egg on their face,”

OK Mr. Lutz, you said sooner, we’re waiting.

Source (Detroit Free Press)

 

Sep 26

U.S. Government Invests 20 Million in 5 PHEV Lithium-Ion Battery Companies

 

doe.jpg

Lithium-ion battery powered plug-in electric cars like the Volt are the next phase in the history of automotive transportation. The cars are not really here yet, but on the very verge of widespread and massive production with the plug-in Saturn VUE and the Chevy Volt leading the way.

The U.S. government supports this transition, and is eager to help the country move away from its oil addiction.

To that end, the U.S. Department of Energy has announced it will award nearly 20 million dollars in funding to five companies capable of making automotive lithium-ion battery systems. Consider these five companies the cream of the crop, in descending order of grant size:

1. A123 (Watertown, MA) – $6.25 million to develop doped iron phosphate chemistry batteries for 10 and 40 mile range PHEVs

2. Compact Power
(Troy, MI) – $4.45 million to develop Manganese-spinel batteries for a 10 mile PHEV

3. Johnson Controls/Saft ( Milwaukee, WI) – $4.1 million to develop nickelate/layered chemistry for 10 and 40 mile PHEVs4. EnerDel (Indianapolis, IN) – $1.25 million to develop lithium titanate anode, nickel-manganese cathode cells for 10 and 40 mile PHEVs

4.  EnerDel (Indianapolis, IN) – $1.25 million to develop  cells for 10- and 40-mile range PHEVs using nano-phase lithium titanate coupled with a high voltage Nickel-Manganese cathode material;
5. 3M (St. Paul, MN) – $1.14 million to screen nickel/manganese/cobalt cathode materials for small plug-in cars

It is important to point out that these funds will be matched by industry funds from of the USABC (U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium) whose constituent members include the big 3: GM, Ford, and Chrysler.

Two million dollars will also go to the University of Michigan to do a study on PHEVs environmental and electric grid impact, preliminay results expectd at the Jan 08 Detroit Auto Show.

As for release dates..”DOE goals include making PHEVs cost-competitive by 2014 and ready for commercialization by 2016.” Yikes.

Anyway I think this shows us how important the PHEV revolution is for the U.S., and it also tells us who the important battery producers are likely to be in this new era. Also note how the top 3 are already working directly with GM.

DOE RELEASE

 
Page 1 of 71234567