<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now Toyota Plugs-in Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/</link>
	<description>Real-time news, information, and discussion about the Chevrolet Volt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:07:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: watch burn notice</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-154890</link>
		<dc:creator>watch burn notice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-154890</guid>
		<description>burn notice is the best because of Fiona</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>burn notice is the best because of Fiona</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RP</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-4807</link>
		<dc:creator>RP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-4807</guid>
		<description>You guys are comparing a Prius that went on sale in 2006 with a Volt that *may* go on sale in 2009-2010.

Everyone is waiting for Lithium Ion batteries to get cheap enough to use.  Why do you think the Tesla costs $80,000?

Toyota can&#039;t go live with Lithium Ion today, the price would scare everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are comparing a Prius that went on sale in 2006 with a Volt that *may* go on sale in 2009-2010.</p>
<p>Everyone is waiting for Lithium Ion batteries to get cheap enough to use.  Why do you think the Tesla costs $80,000?</p>
<p>Toyota can&#8217;t go live with Lithium Ion today, the price would scare everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H. Hulseman</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3019</link>
		<dc:creator>H. Hulseman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3019</guid>
		<description>A series/parallel hybrid may be a better solution for those who frequently drive long distances, because direct drive may deliver better gas mileage. I own a Prius and I think the Prius needs more battery in any case.

I am very excited about the Volt and agree that the Volt will no doubt be superior for an urban drive pattern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A series/parallel hybrid may be a better solution for those who frequently drive long distances, because direct drive may deliver better gas mileage. I own a Prius and I think the Prius needs more battery in any case.</p>
<p>I am very excited about the Volt and agree that the Volt will no doubt be superior for an urban drive pattern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3017</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3017</guid>
		<description>As Kent said, I don&#039;t think the Prius is a good candidate for plug-in technology as it is currently designed.  A &quot;series hybrid&quot; (EV with on-board generation) like the Volt is a much more elegant solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Kent said, I don&#8217;t think the Prius is a good candidate for plug-in technology as it is currently designed.  A &#8220;series hybrid&#8221; (EV with on-board generation) like the Volt is a much more elegant solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario M</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3016</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3016</guid>
		<description>If there&#039;s one thing that the Japanese have proved over the years it&#039;s that they are great innovators (as opposed to being great inventors). Even if GM puts out the Vault in 2010, I think the Japanese car manufacturers will roll out a competitive vehicle in two to three years, if not sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there&#8217;s one thing that the Japanese have proved over the years it&#8217;s that they are great innovators (as opposed to being great inventors). Even if GM puts out the Vault in 2010, I think the Japanese car manufacturers will roll out a competitive vehicle in two to three years, if not sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent beuchert</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3015</link>
		<dc:creator>kent beuchert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3015</guid>
		<description>Toyota really is fumbling on the plg-in. They are simply replicating the aftermakert conversions of the Prius (even up to the removal of the spare tire) to do two things - get some PR by claiming that they need to &quot;test&quot; these vehicles in various countries to &quot;understand the preferences of the various people.&quot; What a crock - with an 8 mile electric range, I can confidently predict the first complain of these &quot;testers.&quot; The second complaint will be the fact that the cobbled-up Priuses only can go 60 MPH in electric mode (the VOLT can do 120). The next complaint will be the lack of a spare tire. Now, can anyone tell me what in the world is going through those Toyota engineers&#039; minds to make them believe that they will learn 
anything important by putting out there a car that won&#039;t be very much like the final 
product? The recharge times will be different also - they will be much shorter for the &quot;tester&quot; car. None of this makes any sense unless you understand that Toyota is trying desperately to shift the green spotlight back on them. Their plug-in is a crappy design -- the Prius was designed as a dual propulsion vehicle, with transmission, elaborate controls, etc.  - this is not a good design for a plug-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toyota really is fumbling on the plg-in. They are simply replicating the aftermakert conversions of the Prius (even up to the removal of the spare tire) to do two things &#8211; get some PR by claiming that they need to &#8220;test&#8221; these vehicles in various countries to &#8220;understand the preferences of the various people.&#8221; What a crock &#8211; with an 8 mile electric range, I can confidently predict the first complain of these &#8220;testers.&#8221; The second complaint will be the fact that the cobbled-up Priuses only can go 60 MPH in electric mode (the VOLT can do 120). The next complaint will be the lack of a spare tire. Now, can anyone tell me what in the world is going through those Toyota engineers&#8217; minds to make them believe that they will learn<br />
anything important by putting out there a car that won&#8217;t be very much like the final<br />
product? The recharge times will be different also &#8211; they will be much shorter for the &#8220;tester&#8221; car. None of this makes any sense unless you understand that Toyota is trying desperately to shift the green spotlight back on them. Their plug-in is a crappy design &#8212; the Prius was designed as a dual propulsion vehicle, with transmission, elaborate controls, etc.  &#8211; this is not a good design for a plug-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt986</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3014</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt986</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3014</guid>
		<description>Steven,

I believe this next gen Prius is the same as before - when the battery is drained, the ICE drives the wheels through a planetary gear between it and a transmission.  It also runs the motor as a generator to regenerate at the same time.  This is not a series arrangement, it&#039;s still parallel.  

It is a good step forward that it has some electric only range, and can be recharged at home.  I&#039;m wondering if they&#039;d be able to get a significantly better range if the went with a LiIon battery.

Of course, I think if this is the best that Japan comes up with to compete with the Volt... they&#039;re going to lose the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven,</p>
<p>I believe this next gen Prius is the same as before &#8211; when the battery is drained, the ICE drives the wheels through a planetary gear between it and a transmission.  It also runs the motor as a generator to regenerate at the same time.  This is not a series arrangement, it&#8217;s still parallel.  </p>
<p>It is a good step forward that it has some electric only range, and can be recharged at home.  I&#8217;m wondering if they&#8217;d be able to get a significantly better range if the went with a LiIon battery.</p>
<p>Of course, I think if this is the best that Japan comes up with to compete with the Volt&#8230; they&#8217;re going to lose the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven B</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3013</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3013</guid>
		<description>Something interesting about this development (I didn&#039;t notice it being mentioned) is that this advanced Prius may be a series-hybrid design like the Volt.  I&#039;m keen on the Volt for its full-functioning plug-in EV ability with the 40 mile EV-only range, but pure electric drive is also a winner.  Electric motors are superior than internal combustion, and in a series-hybrid design the ICE can run at optimum efficiency at all times and be downsized.  Even if it were to have no plug-in capability (which would put it at a potentially severe market disadvantage) a series-hybrid electric drive vehicle would be awesome!  It would mean high-torque output from start and high fuel economy numbers.  Awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something interesting about this development (I didn&#8217;t notice it being mentioned) is that this advanced Prius may be a series-hybrid design like the Volt.  I&#8217;m keen on the Volt for its full-functioning plug-in EV ability with the 40 mile EV-only range, but pure electric drive is also a winner.  Electric motors are superior than internal combustion, and in a series-hybrid design the ICE can run at optimum efficiency at all times and be downsized.  Even if it were to have no plug-in capability (which would put it at a potentially severe market disadvantage) a series-hybrid electric drive vehicle would be awesome!  It would mean high-torque output from start and high fuel economy numbers.  Awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt986</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3012</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt986</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3012</guid>
		<description>The goal of 40 miles is great, because it means the MAJORITY of commuters can accomplish their daily commute without having to burn any gas.  It&#039;s a good goal, and I think GM shouldn&#039;t lower that bar.  If you want something sooner, go buy a Prius. 

In the mean time... 

http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/24/autos/porsche_hybrid/index.htm?cnn=yes

THAT would look great parked next to my Boxster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The goal of 40 miles is great, because it means the MAJORITY of commuters can accomplish their daily commute without having to burn any gas.  It&#8217;s a good goal, and I think GM shouldn&#8217;t lower that bar.  If you want something sooner, go buy a Prius. </p>
<p>In the mean time&#8230; </p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/24/autos/porsche_hybrid/index.htm?cnn=yes" rel="nofollow">http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/24/autos/porsche_hybrid/index.htm?cnn=yes</a></p>
<p>THAT would look great parked next to my Boxster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AES</title>
		<link>http://gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3011</link>
		<dc:creator>AES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gm-volt.com/2007/07/25/now-toyota-plugs-in-too/#comment-3011</guid>
		<description>This sounds like a science experiment that Toyota has put together, rather than a finished product. Sounds like they just put in a bigger electric motor and a bigger battery pack, and changed the software to make the car electric-only. 

Putting the battery pack in the trunk isn&#039;t going to help with rear crash tests, by the way. That pack placement may have also been a factor in not equipping the next Prius with lithium-ion batteries. Call me a GM fanboy, but I&#039;ve always thought the centerline battery placement strategy (which is the same in both the EV1 and Volt) was properly brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a science experiment that Toyota has put together, rather than a finished product. Sounds like they just put in a bigger electric motor and a bigger battery pack, and changed the software to make the car electric-only. </p>
<p>Putting the battery pack in the trunk isn&#8217;t going to help with rear crash tests, by the way. That pack placement may have also been a factor in not equipping the next Prius with lithium-ion batteries. Call me a GM fanboy, but I&#8217;ve always thought the centerline battery placement strategy (which is the same in both the EV1 and Volt) was properly brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.386 seconds -->
